For financial professionals in Finland

A focus on rational expectations key for technology stocks

The Global Technology Leaders Team discuss valuations, growth expectations for 2023 and how technology can address some of the world’s major challenges.

Alison Porter

Alison Porter

Portfolio Manager


Graeme Clark

Graeme Clark

Portfolio Manager


Richard Clode, CFA

Richard Clode, CFA

Portfolio Manager


14 Dec 2022
7 minute read

Key takeaways:

  • The tech sector typically leads in an economic upcycle. Valuations and expectations have corrected significantly this year and although we expect further weakness, we may be close to a bottom in earnings revisions.
  • Tech’s sharp gains and losses over the last few years are not typical. We expect performance to be less broad based, driven more by bottom-up stock selection than style, macro and thematic factors.
  • We remain focused on aiming to identify the global tech leaders of the future with reasonable growth expectations and valuations.

Entering 2022, we were sceptical of technology companies with strong thematic appeal, high growth expectations but limited profitability. While that proved prescient, even some of the most profitable and resilient tech business models suffered losses as investors adjusted to higher inflation and interest rates. Growth slowed across the sector, given difficult comparisons from the rapid acceleration in digital transformation during COVID lockdowns, economic headwinds, policy pressure in China and supply chain shortages. There were precious few hiding places in the tech sector in 2022.

A question of when, not if

Given the US Federal Reserve’s key objective is to tame inflation, we expect that economic conditions will have to deteriorate markedly before we reach a peak in the rate hiking cycle. Slowing growth and inflation management could drive ongoing market price fluctuations (volatility) until expectations of growth rationalise further. The equity market is a discounting mechanism, and as in the past, is likely to rebound when expectations for economic growth improve. The technology sector was the first to recover in 2009 following the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), driven by the strength of the sector’s balance sheets, the lack of legacy pension fund liabilities and the fact that earnings growth, while impaired by a weak economy, was still comparatively higher than the broader market – technology continued to take share from the rest of the economy. It is notable that in the 23 equity market bull cycles prior to 2022, technology outperformed other sectors 87% of the time (figure 1).

Figure 1: Tech outperformed in 20 out of 23 bull cycles

Sector outperformance rates in prior bull cycles

Source: Oppenheimer & Co., Bloomberg, June 1932 to December 2021. Past performance does not predict future returns.

Back to a ‘new old normal’ – focus on stock selection

The tech sector saw volatile returns of more than +25% in 2021 and less than -25% year-to-date* in 2022. Part of this volatility was driven by ‘free money’ through unprecedented government intervention, including monetary stimulus and then its withdrawal, which had a multiplier effect on returns. With monetary policy normalisation, we expect 2023 returns could also normalise. At the time of writing (early December 2022), tech valuations are in line with the long-term average but still at the high end of a ten-year range (figure 2).

Figure 2: Tech versus broader equities – in line with long-term valuation

Source: Janus Henderson Investors, Bernstein, as at 8 December 2022.

Note: Forward price-to-earnings ratio is calculated by dividing the current share price by projected earnings for the next 12 months to value a company’s shares. (Orange line) MSCI ACWI Information Technology Index (technology), price-to-forward earnings relative to MSCI ACWI Index (global equities) from September 1999 to November 2018 pre GICS sector changes in MSCI Global indices, then (grey line) MSCI ACWI Information Technology + ACWI Communication Services Index relative to MSCI ACWI Index to 30 September 2022 post GICS sector changes in MSCI Global indices.

We view valuation as a neutral to negative factor for the tech sector when it comes to stock selection. As such our focus is on a company’s earnings power rather than the multiple. We have already seen a sharp correction in earnings expectations for the sector (referring to the orange line in figure 3); a trend that would have been more apparent if not for the resilience of two of the sector’s largest companies, Apple and Microsoft.

While the orange line depicting the breadth of earnings revisions has not yet reached the lowest point we saw after the tech bubble in 2002, GFC in 2009 or pandemic low in 2020, we may be closer to the bottom/end of the downward revisions of company earnings cycle than the top. That said, we do expect further downgrades in the first quarter of 2023, particularly in some areas of the software sector where extraordinary growth rates are still being extrapolated. This point of inflection in valuation has historically, typically been the most attractive time for active managers to invest, and we believe that as we approach it, active stock selection and valuation discipline are going to be key. Many of the tech leaders in the dot.com era took around 20 years to recover to their valuation highs. We do not see a return to ‘free money’, or thematic ‘growth at any price’, and believe that stocks and investment processes that benefited from that environment or theme may not perform as well as they have done previously.

Figure 3: Tech company earnings revisions

Source: Morgan Stanley, Bloomberg, as at 14 November 2022. Orange line refers to percentage of number of companies within S&P500 Information Technology Index with positive/negative earnings revisions. Past performance does not predict future returns.

Tech leaders of the future are providing solutions

We view technology as the science of solving problems. Over the last 50 years rising technology adoption has been a deflationary force but despite the rapid digital transformation during the pandemic, productivity gains have not been evident. This is largely due to weak productivity measurements that fail to capture time and energy savings as they are not accounted for in additional spending or sales.

Inflation is a symptom of challenges such as skills and labour force shortages, high energy costs and threatened energy and data security – all issues that technology can help address.

This need has been recognised by a myriad of regulation and legislation passed in 2022 such as the CHIPS and Science Act and the Inflation Reduction Act in the US. Funding and incentives through such legislation can catalyse further targeted spending and investment in a greener electrical revolution that requires exponentially more semiconductors, components, connectivity, and software.

Technologies that offer efficiency gains such as asset tracking, automation, artificial intelligence, and lower power consumption, are well positioned to take increasing share of tech spending budgets in 2023. Conversely, growth in digital advertising spending looks more challenging given increasing competition and more complex operating environments. While we are wary of companies that seek to grow earnings purely through cost cutting, we do believe that such programmes could drive materially higher profitability as we exit 2022 and could create opportunities in mispriced value.

In summary

In our view, tech sector outperformance in 2023 will be less broad-based and less straightforward than in recent years. Rather than following a value or growth style bias or merely identifying investment themes, we think returns are more likely to be delivered by stock picking. Here, deep experience of understanding growth expectations and being disciplined on valuation could be even more important in determining tech stock returns.

Technology is the science of solving problems, with digital transformation remaining in the early stages, with multiple challenges to address. We remain focused on aiming to identify the global technology leaders of the future by focusing on high-quality technology companies that are taking share within growing addressable markets. And similar to our investment approach, these companies typically exhibit strong discipline, investing only where there is the potential for incrementally higher returns on invested capital.

 

*Source: Refinitiv Datastream. MSCI ACWI Information Technology Index, price returns in US dollars for calendar year 2021 and year-to-date to 8 December 2022. Past performance does not predict future returns.

Balance sheet: a financial statement that summarises a company’s assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity at a point in time.

Bull cycle: occurs when assets or securities such as equities are on the rise over a sustained period of time. The opposite of a bear market.

Discounting mechanism: stock market participants consider all available information and events, current and future into their valuations and positioning.

Earnings revisions: analysts revising upwards or downwards a company’s earnings forecasts according to their expectations for growth and profitability.

Monetary policy normalisation: phasing out of central banks’ unconventional monetary policies (zero or low interest rates and purchase of short-term government bonds) that were put in place to stimulate the global economy following the 2008 Global Financial Crisis.

Monetary stimulus: central bank action to increase the supply of money and lower borrowing costs to stimulate economic growth.

Multiple: a ratio used to value similar company based on the same financial metrics. One of the most popular for equities is price-to-earnings.

Multiplier effect: relates to government policy having a larger effect on the economy than the face value of the spending eg. when making changes to interest rates and money supply via monetary policy or government spending and taxes via fiscal policy.

Value/growth style: value investors look for companies that they believe are undervalued by the market, and therefore expect their share price to increase, while growth investors search for companies with earnings that are expected to grow at an above-average rate compared to the rest of the market, and therefore anticipate the share prices will increase in value.

Market GPS

2023 Investment Outlook:
Finding the silver lining

GPS Map

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Technology industries can be significantly affected by obsolescence of existing technology, short product cycles, falling prices and profits, competition from new market entrants, and general economic conditions. A concentrated investment in a single industry could be more volatile than the performance of less concentrated investments and the market as a whole.

Foreign securities are subject to additional risks including currency fluctuations, political and economic uncertainty, increased volatility, lower liquidity, and differing financial and information reporting standards, all of which are magnified in emerging markets.

These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. Any securities, funds, sectors and indices mentioned within this article do not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to buy or sell them.

 

Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.

 

The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.

 

Marketing Communication.

 

Glossary

 

 

 

Important information

Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.

The Janus Henderson Horizon Fund (the “Fund”) is a Luxembourg SICAV incorporated on 30 May 1985, managed by Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. may decide to terminate the marketing arrangements of this Collective Investment Scheme in accordance with the appropriate regulation. This is a marketing communication. Please refer to the prospectus of the UCITS and to the KIID before making any final investment decisions.
    Specific risks
  • Shares/Units can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
  • Shares of small and mid-size companies can be more volatile than shares of larger companies, and at times it may be difficult to value or to sell shares at desired times and prices, increasing the risk of losses.
  • If a Fund has a high exposure to a particular country or geographical region it carries a higher level of risk than a Fund which is more broadly diversified.
  • The Fund is focused towards particular industries or investment themes and may be heavily impacted by factors such as changes in government regulation, increased price competition, technological advancements and other adverse events.
  • The Fund follows a sustainable investment approach, which may cause it to be overweight and/or underweight in certain sectors and thus perform differently than funds that have a similar objective but which do not integrate sustainable investment criteria when selecting securities.
  • The Fund may use derivatives with the aim of reducing risk or managing the portfolio more efficiently. However this introduces other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
  • If the Fund holds assets in currencies other than the base currency of the Fund or you invest in a share/unit class of a different currency to the Fund (unless 'hedged'), the value of your investment may be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
  • When the Fund, or a hedged share/unit class, seeks to mitigate exchange rate movements of a currency relative to the base currency, the hedging strategy itself may create a positive or negative impact to the value of the Fund due to differences in short-term interest rates between the currencies.
  • Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
  • The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.
The Janus Henderson Horizon Fund (the “Fund”) is a Luxembourg SICAV incorporated on 30 May 1985, managed by Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. may decide to terminate the marketing arrangements of this Collective Investment Scheme in accordance with the appropriate regulation. This is a marketing communication. Please refer to the prospectus of the UCITS and to the KIID before making any final investment decisions.
    Specific risks
  • Shares/Units can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
  • If a Fund has a high exposure to a particular country or geographical region it carries a higher level of risk than a Fund which is more broadly diversified.
  • The Fund is focused towards particular industries or investment themes and may be heavily impacted by factors such as changes in government regulation, increased price competition, technological advancements and other adverse events.
  • This Fund may have a particularly concentrated portfolio relative to its investment universe or other funds in its sector. An adverse event impacting even a small number of holdings could create significant volatility or losses for the Fund.
  • The Fund may use derivatives with the aim of reducing risk or managing the portfolio more efficiently. However this introduces other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
  • If the Fund holds assets in currencies other than the base currency of the Fund or you invest in a share/unit class of a different currency to the Fund (unless 'hedged'), the value of your investment may be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
  • When the Fund, or a hedged share/unit class, seeks to mitigate exchange rate movements of a currency relative to the base currency, the hedging strategy itself may create a positive or negative impact to the value of the Fund due to differences in short-term interest rates between the currencies.
  • Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
  • The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.