For financial professionals in the UK

Investing with an embedded approach to ESG

Neil Hermon

Neil Hermon

Director of UK Equities | Fund Manager

26 Nov 2020

In recent years the letters E, S and G have never been uttered more. These letters in the context of investing stand for environmental, social and governance and we welcome the fact that they are gaining so much prominence.

Given the amount of data and insight amassed on these topics alongside the proliferation of information on social media, it is no surprise that consumer preferences and government agendas have shifted dramatically towards these three words. So too has investor interest. Companies must be cognisant of the ongoing energy transition, as well as changing sentiment towards social norms, occupational behaviour and the firm’s wider impact on society and the environment. We are increasingly asked if ESG factors are important to us as investors and how exactly it is that we incorporate ESG analysis into our portfolio construction.

Our approach to ESG investing

Our approach to ESG investing is (and has always been) embedded in our investment process. This is the same process that was put in place when I joined in 2002. Our “4Ms” process is used to assess companies and the industries they operate in; a valuation overlay is then applied to ascertain whether, in our opinion, we are paying the right price for that company.  The “4Ms” process includes an analysis of; model, money, management and momentum.


When we analyse business models a key part of our philosophy is focussed on their sustainability. Many factors contribute towards a company’s ability to create enduring franchises. Companies that have positive impacts on the environment through efficiency gains or otherwise will often thrive as a result.


ESG factors also have an impact on a company’s money or financial position. If a company is subject to increased regulation or industry specific taxes this will impact a company’s cash generating ability. Furthermore, it is rarely easy to assess the quality of a company through the use of pure financial data and industry analysis.


A determination of the quality of management and key decision makers is one of the most important parts of company assessment. Our belief is that Management teams that have a long-term focus, a good track record of shareholder alignment and understand the sustainability or thematic dynamics at play in the industry are more likely to outperform those that do not.


Finally, earnings momentum refers to the ability of a company to over-deliver against market expectations and grow earnings strongly into the future. Success here relies heavily on a sustainable strategy being put in place by a strong management team that is overseen by an experienced and independent board.

We believe ESG factors impact all parts of an investment case often implicitly, not explicitly. The effectiveness of a company’s corporate governance structure and the impact a company has on the environment and society, we believe, are just as important as more traditional indicators of quality such cash flow or returns on invested capital.

A company’s ESG characteristics directly impact how it is valued. All these factors influence the price multiples the market is willing to attribute to a company’s earnings or the cost of capital used to discount its cash flows. Our core belief is that companies that score well on ESG and sustainability factors warrant a premium over time.

Investing for the long term

Does this mean we only invest in companies with strong green credentials or perfectly diverse boards? No, we do not. We believe how a company is valued tomorrow is in many ways more important than how a company is valued today. Which is why we do not automatically exclude companies that do not score well on ESG metrics today.

For instance, if a corporate board or management team are committed to improving governance or reducing carbon emissions, we believe there are positive returns to be generated from the increasing earnings multiples the market would be willing to attribute to these stocks in the future. Indeed, as active investors we also see it as incumbent upon us to use our shareholder influence to effect this change. We use the access we have to management to challenge their thought processes or raise awareness of issues. We would also make the point that this is a privilege not afforded to managers of passive investment products.

Ultimately, our job is to try to maximise shareholder returns and that means we need to have an investment process which accommodates, not just appends, the importance of ESG analysis and takes into account all the different factors that drive earnings and valuations ‘today and tomorrow’. We believe our process does this and has been integral to the performance delivered so far. Since I joined in 2002 the Henderson Smaller Companies Investment Trust has produced a cumulative NAV total return of 1,239% versus our benchmark (the Numis Smaller Companies Index) which has returned 606%1 and outperformed the benchmark in the last 15 out of the last 17 financial years.

Annual performance (cumulative income) (%)

Discrete year performance % change (updated quarterly) Share Price NAV
30/09/2019 to 30/09/2020 -10.6 -4.0
28/09/2018 to 30/09/2019 -2.9 -5.2
29/09/2017 to 28/09/2018 18.4 10.6
30/09/2016 to 29/09/2017 23.6 26.2
30/09/2015 to 30/09/2016 7.4 9.1

All performance, cumulative and annual growth data is sourced from Morningstar as at 31 October 2020


Net asset value (NAV) - The total value of a fund's assets less its liabilities.

Valuation metrics - Metrics used to gauge a company’s performance, financial health and expectations for future earnings eg, price to earnings (P/E) ratio and return on equity (ROE).
1Source: Janus Henderson Investors, as at 18 November 2020


These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. Any securities, funds, sectors and indices mentioned within this article do not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to buy or sell them.


Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.


The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.


Marketing Communication.






Important information

Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.

Before investing in an investment trust referred to in this document, you should satisfy yourself as to its suitability and the risks involved, you may wish to consult a financial adviser. This is a marketing communication. Please refer to the AIFMD Disclosure document and Annual Report of the AIF before making any final investment decisions.
    Specific risks
  • If a Company's portfolio is concentrated towards a particular country or geographical region, the investment carries greater risk than a portfolio diversified across more countries.
  • Most of the investments in this portfolio are in smaller companies shares. They may be more difficult to buy and sell and their share price may fluctuate more than that of larger companies.
  • This Company is suitable to be used as one component in several in a diversified investment portfolio. Investors should consider carefully the proportion of their portfolio invested into this Company.
  • Active management techniques that have worked well in normal market conditions could prove ineffective or detrimental at other times.
  • The Company could lose money if a counterparty with which it trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations to the Company.
  • Shares can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
  • The return on your investment is directly related to the prevailing market price of the Company's shares, which will trade at a varying discount (or premium) relative to the value of the underlying assets of the Company. As a result losses (or gains) may be higher or lower than those of the Company's assets.
  • The Company may use gearing as part of its investment strategy. If the Company utilises its ability to gear, the profits and losses incured by the Company can be greater than those of a Company that does not use gearing.
  • Derivatives use exposes the Company to risks different from, and potentially greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and may therefore result in additional loss, which could be significantly greater than the cost of the derivative.