The Fed reaches its predicted terminal rate – now what?
Portfolio Manager Jason England believes that by raising interest rates to 5.25%, the Federal Reserve (Fed) has bought itself time to assess the degree to which previous hikes have quelled persistent inflation.
6 minute read
- In a widely expected move, the Fed raised its benchmark rate 25 bps and – in contrast to dovish market expectations – plans to remain at that level for the foreseeable future.
- The Fed’s path is complicated by persistent inflation and a US labour shortage, meaning that its continued focus on price stability is likely the right tactic rather than repeating the mistakes of the past and pivoting prematurely.
- Higher yields globally, along with a divergence of policy across regions during the late cycle, creates opportunities for bond investors with respect to managing both interest rate and credit risk.
In the game of chicken between the US Federal Reserve (Fed) and the bond market that has been going on since last year, the US central bank won out by reaching its stated terminal rate of 5.25% for this tightening cycle. Still to be determined is how long the upper limit of the federal funds rate remains at this level. The Fed has been adamant that it is premature to consider a rate cut – expecting the 5.25% level to stick through the end of 2023 – whereas the market divines that rates will slide to 4.50% by December.
Leading into the May meeting, many market participants were eager to categorise the well-telegraphed 25 basis point (bps) increase as a dovish hike. We don’t think that’s the case, as Fed Chairman Jerome Powell and other voting members rightly recognise the risks posed by inflation to consumers’ purchasing power and price stability across the economy. Consequently, we see this week’s decision as a modestly hawkish pause that will allow the Fed to gauge previous rate increases’ impact on further lowering inflation.
And now the hard part
We have long stated that it would be much easier to lower inflation from its 9.1% peak to 5.0%, based on the U.S. Consumer Price Index, than it would be to get from 5.0% to the Fed’s 2.0% objective. For perspective, the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation – the Core Personal Consumption Expenditure Price Index – has fallen a more muted 5.4% to 4.6%. Standing in the way is the persistent nature of this bout of inflation, especially the stickiness of service-sector wages due to a historically tight labour market.
Components of Consumer Price Index
While both headline and core inflation have fallen, services – with their notoriously sticky wage component – have become a much larger component of overall price increases.
Source: Bloomberg, as of 3 May 2023. *CPI XYOY = CPI urban consumers, less food and energy (YoY% change).
Many have suggested that with several leading indicators – namely an inverted US Treasuries yield curve – already signalling weakness, the Fed may stick to its tendency of transitioning to rate cuts in relatively short order. Probabilities based on futures markets imply a cut by as soon as July. We do not think that will be the case, however. Historically, quicker pivots have occurred when the central bank prematurely turned dovish, such as during the 1970s and early 1980s. This only allowed inflation to become more embedded, setting the stage for policy having to ultimately become even more restrictive.
Path of fed funds rate
The Fed has historically pivoted relatively quickly once having reached its cycle terminal rate, but we doubt that will be the case this time.
Source: Bloomberg, as of 3 May 2023.
Admittedly, both inflation and employment are lagging indicators, and once they roll over, the economy is already on a decidedly downward path. At the risk of deploying an overused market cliché, we believe this time may be different given the persistence and pervasiveness of inflation globally and the perplexing dearth of US workers.
Some progress is being made on both these fronts: US job openings are down 20% from their peak, and while still in expansion territory, the employment component of the US Services Purchasing Managers Index has dipped toward contraction territory over the past few months. Yet, with more work likely necessary to keep inflation heading lower, we believe the Fed is more apt to take a potentially extended pause – and even surprise markets with another 25 bps hike later in the year should the data merit it – rather than implement a poorly timed pivot.
Banking tumult cutting both ways
Chairman Powell again addressed the failure of several US banks, stating that the country’s banking system remains healthy and well capitalised. While an unwelcome development, skittishness among the banking community may play into to Fed’s hands. We believe that the tightening credit standards that are likely the result of the banking tumult could translate to the equivalent of roughly an additional 25 bps rate increase.
With the end of this tightening cycle likely on the horizon, bond investors can begin thinking about shifting toward an opportunistic stance within the global market. While inflation is a global phenomenon driven in part by ascendant forces such as deglobalisation and tight labour markets, we are starting to see divergence in the policy paths of different regions. The US, for instance, was forceful – albeit late – in its response. This is evident in yields on all but the shortest of maturities having fallen in 2023.
US Treasuries curve
The fall in yield across all but the shortest of maturities indicates that the Fed is likely nearing the end of its hiking cycle, while other jurisdictions may experience additional upward pressure, especially along the front end.
Source: Bloomberg, as of 3 May 2023.
Australia, meanwhile, caught the market somewhat off guard with its recent rate increase, but its policy rate remains well below that of the US. The European Central Bank was late to the game and has been playing catch-up since mid-2022 in an attempt to drive down headline inflation of 7.0%. The upshot is bond investors now have the ability to not only capture levels of income not available only a year ago, but also position themselves to participate in the capital appreciation that can diversify against riskier assets in times of stress. Indeed, this is how US bonds performed during the volatile stretch caused by banking sector tumult.
Lastly, bond investors need to recognize that the days of chasing yield are over. A higher cost of capital has put many companies that are dependent upon cheap financing on the back foot. Tightening credit standards will only exacerbate this trend. We are especially cautious of lower-quality companies and those exposed to a high degree of economic cyclicality. Instead, we believe that the resetting of yields has made corporate issuers with proven management teams and the ability to consistently generate cash flow throughout the cycle an attractive destination on a risk-adjusted basis.
Basis point (bp) equals 1/100 of a percentage point. 1 bp = 0.01%, 100 bps = 1%.
Consumer Price Index (CPI) is an unmanaged index representing the rate of inflation of the U.S. consumer prices as determined by the U.S. Department of Labor Statistics.
Core Personal Consumption Expenditure Price Index is a measure of prices that people living in the United States pay for goods and services, excluding food and energy.
Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) is an index of the prevailing direction of economic trends in the manufacturing and service sectors, based on a survey of private sector companies.
A yield curve plots the yields (interest rate) of bonds with equal credit quality but differing maturity dates. Typically bonds with longer maturities have higher yields.
An inverted yield curve occurs when short-term yields are higher than long-term yields.
Diversification neither assures a profit nor eliminates the risk of experiencing investment losses.
These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. Any securities, funds, sectors and indices mentioned within this article do not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to buy or sell them.
Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.
The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.
Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.
- An issuer of a bond (or money market instrument) may become unable or unwilling to pay interest or repay capital to the Fund. If this happens or the market perceives this may happen, the value of the bond will fall.
- When interest rates rise (or fall), the prices of different securities will be affected differently. In particular, bond values generally fall when interest rates rise (or are expected to rise). This risk is typically greater the longer the maturity of a bond investment.
- Callable debt securities, such as some asset-backed or mortgage-backed securities (ABS/MBS), give issuers the right to repay capital before the maturity date or to extend the maturity. Issuers may exercise these rights when favourable to them and as a result the value of the fund may be impacted.
- The Fund may use derivatives to help achieve its investment objective. This can result in leverage (higher levels of debt), which can magnify an investment outcome. Gains or losses to the Fund may therefore be greater than the cost of the derivative. Derivatives also introduce other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
- If the Fund holds assets in currencies other than the base currency of the Fund, or you invest in a share/unit class of a different currency to the Fund (unless hedged, i.e. mitigated by taking an offsetting position in a related security), the value of your investment may be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
- When the Fund, or a share/unit class, seeks to mitigate exchange rate movements of a currency relative to the base currency (hedge), the hedging strategy itself may positively or negatively impact the value of the Fund due to differences in short-term interest rates between the currencies.
- Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
- The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.