For individual investors in the UK

What is going on in China?

Mike Kerley

Mike Kerley

Portfolio Manager

Sat Duhra

Sat Duhra

Portfolio Manager

26 Aug 2021

Since the suspension of Ant Group's blockbuster IPO last year, Beijing has embarked on an unprecedented clampdown of its technology sector. The natural progression to this was when Alibaba was hit with a record anti-trust fine of 18 billion yuan in April for supposedly abusing its market dominance.1 More recently, however, the regulatory clampdown has intensified, causing a sell-off in those sectors deemed "socially sensitive" and leading many to question whether it is worth investing in China.

In July, the government opened a cybersecurity review into ride-hailing company Didi two days after the company went public in New York, stepping up scrutiny after earlier criticism of the company's handling of customer information. Regulators also ordered Didi to remove some of its apps from platforms in China, which the company said would hurt revenues, and subsequently sent the shares falling by 30%. Three weeks later, the government abruptly barred tutoring companies from making profits, a move which triggered a nearly $1 trillion global sell-off and sent shares of online private tutoring companies Tal Education and New Oriental Education and Technology, plummeting by 70.8% and 54.2%, respectively.2

Cliff Dive - Chinese education stocks plunge amid possibility of being forced to become non-profit

3Source: Bloomberg, as at 23, July 2021

More recently, the casualties have included online gaming and social media company Tencent - Asia's largest stock by market value - after the Chinese state media described games as "spiritual opium" and "electronic drugs". Rivals NetEase and Nexon Co were also caught in the storm, with investors already on edge after Beijing came down hard on online industries from e-commerce to ride-hailing apps.

Opium of the Masses - Tencent led falls in gaming stock Tuesday

4Source: Bloomberg, as at 3 August 2021

On the surface, China's crackdown has been interpreted by some investors as a clash between the government and private businesses. The reality, however, is more complicated. China's government is looking to level the playing field and reduce widespread inequality, which is reflected in the areas that have seen increased levels of regulation.

Firstly, the Chinese internet platforms have grown rapidly over the last few years, partly due to the lax regulatory environment. This has resulted in some businesses gaining unfair competitive advantages, and we have even seen some exhibit monopolistic characteristics. Therefore, the new regulation aims to address the regulatory loopholes that some businesses have exploited to promote fair competition, sustainable growth and ultimately level the playing field. To look at this as a 'crackdown' on private companies, some might say, is a misunderstanding of the government's plan.

Secondly, after declaring that it had eradicated poverty, China has turned its focus towards "common prosperity," which has led to increased regulation in areas with crucial social welfare implications, such as healthcare, education, and property. For many residents in the larger cities, their lives have become riddled with anxieties' that belie the broader sense of progress - from seemingly unattainable home prices to the pressure of securing the best education for their children and coveted places at leading universities. Therefore, the recent ban on tutoring and compulsory education, intensified regulation in the real estate market, and the broader coverage of social security and the health care system are all trying to address the top concerns of the average family in China. We have also seen steps towards improving safety and labour rights for delivery workers.

What does this mean for investors?

The measures undertaken are not a huge surprise considering the well-documented goals of the Chinese government. Perhaps what may have caught some investors off guard is the scale and the timing of the regulation - an order from on high has been jumped upon by regulators and acted upon without coordination or thought for the consequences. That being said, it was only a matter of time before the internet sector became so large that it started impinging on the powers of the state. At the same time, excess levels of profitability in core areas such as education, healthcare, and property would only be tolerated for so long.

The Henderson Far East Income has circa 17% exposure to China, considerably below the index weight of 30%.5 We do not own Chinese property, education, health care, or the major internet platforms, which have been the areas most affected by the recent regulatory clampdowns. We do own NetEase, the gaming company which has been affected by the current regulation, however we believe the market response in this area is overdone  The focus on the gaming sector is centred on minors and the time spent online by under 18 year olds. Both Tencent and NetEase have brought in strict measures to limit time spent by young people on games and to monitor online behaviour, which are much broader than those applied in the western world. The 20% fall in the share price appears out of kilter with the 2% of company revenue deriving from purchases by under 18’s.

We do not think these measures impact the number of opportunities in China, however, these opportunities are now different. Paying high multiples for structural sectors with high margins and strict regulatory oversight is fraught with danger, but there are other opportunities in areas that fit in with government aims and goals at much more attractive valuation points. The latest five-year plan clearly outlines areas where the government is focusing and investing around these themes makes the most sense to us. Clear targets have been set in terms of localisation (avoiding reliance on US imports) and improvements to the environment while a focus on reducing inequality should be good for trends in low to middle income consumption. An ageing population and shrinking workforce will prompt innovation around working practices involving greater automation, while industrial innovation will be encouraged and supported. In our view, the opportunities lay mainly with the enablers of the transition rather than the frontline players or platforms. For us, that is the software and components in China, materials elsewhere, and consumer discretionary, focusing on low to middle income spend.

Does this change our investment case for China?

Taking a longer-term view, this doesn't change our outlook for China as the long-term structural trends remain intact. It is the second-largest economy in the world and is forecast to grow by 8.1% in 2021, compared to 4.6% growth in Europe and 7.0% growth for both the UK and US.6 It remains the region's growth engine, and the emerging middle class is becoming an ever-larger local market for goods and services, as the exponential profit growth of relative newcomers like Alibaba illustrates. China is also experiencing rapid infrastructure development, technology advancement (much of it homegrown), and rapid adoption and integration into the wider Asian region with a combined population of 4.5 billion, which is estimated to contain 66% of the world's middle class in 10 years.7 This is a reality that is difficult to ignore for many investors.

There is no doubt that the new regulations have got the market spooked. However, comments that China is now uninvestable, in our view, are wide of the mark. Of course, there will be uncertainty in the short-to-medium term, but this will pass as people go back to looking at companies and not government policy. We suspect that earnings revisions will be weak in the coming months as analysts adjust margin expectations. However, the baseline is that revenue should continue to grow commensurate with an economy with high single-digit nominal GDP growth, and hence opportunities will most likely continue to present themselves.


1Source: Reuters, 10.04.2021: China fines Alibaba record $2.75 bln for anti-monopoly violations
2Source: CNBC, 23.07.2021: Another group of U.S.-listed Chinese stocks plunge as Beijing regulators crack down
3Source: Bloomberg, 23.07.2021
4Source: Bloomberg, 3.08.2021
5Source: Janus Henderson, 13.08.2021
6Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook, July 2021
7Source: Henderson Far East Income Annual Report, 2020


References made to individual securities should not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to issue, sell, subscribe or purchase the security. Janus Henderson Investors, one of its affiliated advisor, or its employees, may have a position mentioned in the securities mentioned in the report.

These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. Any securities, funds, sectors and indices mentioned within this article do not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to buy or sell them.


Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.


The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.


Marketing Communication.






Important information

Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.

Before investing in an investment trust referred to in this document, you should satisfy yourself as to its suitability and the risks involved, you may wish to consult a financial adviser. This is a marketing communication. Please refer to the AIFMD Disclosure document and Annual Report of the AIF before making any final investment decisions. Henderson Far East Income Limited is a Jersey fund, registered at Liberté, 19-23 La Motte Street, St Helier, Jersey JE2 4SY and is regulated by the Jersey Financial Services Commission] Ref: 34V
    Specific risks
  • The Company has significant exposure to Emerging Markets, which tend to be less stable than more established markets. These markets can be affected by local political and economic conditions as well as variances in the reliability of trading systems, buying and selling practices, and financial reporting standards.
  • If a Company's portfolio is concentrated towards a particular country or geographical region, the investment carries greater risk than a portfolio that is diversified across more countries.
  • The portfolio allows the manager to use options for efficient portfolio management. Options can be volatile and may result in a capital loss.
  • Where the Company invests in assets that are denominated in currencies other than the base currency, the currency exchange rate movements may cause the value of investments to fall as well as rise.
  • This Company is suitable to be used as one component of several within a diversified investment portfolio. Investors should consider carefully the proportion of their portfolio invested in this Company.
  • Active management techniques that have worked well in normal market conditions could prove ineffective or negative for performance at other times.
  • The Company could lose money if a counterparty with which it trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations to the Company.
  • Shares can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
  • The return on your investment is directly related to the prevailing market price of the Company's shares, which will trade at a varying discount (or premium) relative to the value of the underlying assets of the Company. As a result, losses (or gains) may be higher or lower than those of the Company's assets.
  • The Company may use gearing (borrowing to invest) as part of its investment strategy. If the Company utilises its ability to gear, the profits and losses incurred by the Company can be greater than those of a Company that does not use gearing.
  • All or part of the Company's management fee is taken from its capital. While this allows more income to be paid, it may also restrict capital growth or even result in capital erosion over time.