In this video update, Daniel Graña, Emerging Market Equity Portfolio Manager, believes that not all countries within the asset class should be treated the same and highlights South Africa as a case in point.
Investors should not treat all emerging markets the same, as demonstrated by South Africa.
Poor policy choices in South Africa have led to a spike in government debt and double-digit unemployment, threatening the country’s credit rating.
Other regions within EM, specifically Asia, are adopting growth-oriented reforms and innovating.
Emerging markets (EM) are the home to some very exciting companies and I think it begs a question: is it worth your time to look at opportunities in emerging markets?
Not all emerging markets are the same, created the same, starting points are the same. Some countries are heading in the right direction, and some countries are heading in the wrong direction. So, to say emerging markets, is actually a misnomer. There are parts of the emerging markets that look very promising, there are parts where policy choices undermine the story.
When evaluating countries, [in our view] one that shows up on the negative ledger is South Africa. The policy choices taken over the last few administrations clearly have led South Africa in a more precarious situation. Government debt to GDP [gross domestic product] is rising, they haven’t solved a lot of the problems such as electricity shortages, education needs to change and improvement in skills.
The unemployment rate, the stated one, is 30% now. The true unemployment rate is probably north of 45%. If you were to look at just youth unemployment, the numbers are even worse. And so, naturally, as this generation becomes a voting population, they are going to demand change. And my concern is that the kind of change that appeals to this generation is a lot more radical in terms of macroeconomic policy and it would lead the country faster in the wrong direction.
South Africa depends on foreign savings to balance its books. The problem is the confidence from the foreigners on the South Africa story is coming into question. The reforms that we expected to see under President Ramaphosa are not happening. There is a lot of resistance in the parts of the ANC [African National Congress], the ruling party, to a lot of these reforms that need to happen. And the concern, of course, would be that if South Africa goes deeper and deeper into debt, that all the rating agencies downgrade them to junk and that would potentially cause foreign investors on the bond side to sell. Unfortunately, given the very high foreign ownership of local government bonds, that would necessarily mean potentially an impact on the currency and that, of course, would spook equity investors as well. And so, my concern is that with this lack of commitment to reforms, that scenario is increasingly more likely.
Not all emerging market countries should be treated the same. [The leadership of] some certainly are making poor choices, limiting the investment opportunity. But there are others that are not, that are innovating, that are making their futures better. And investors should consider countries that are thinking about the future, thinking about how to navigate the very difficult global environment.
One region that investors should consider would be Asia. We are seeing innovation not only at the government level, but also at the company level. And so [we think] an investor should consider seriously opportunities in Asia.
Recorded on 1 March 2020
These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. Any securities, funds, sectors and indices mentioned within this article do not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to buy or sell them.
Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.
The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.
The Janus Henderson Fund (the “Fund”) is a Luxembourg SICAV incorporated on 26 September 2000, managed by Henderson Management S.A. Henderson Management SA may decide to terminate the marketing arrangements of this Collective Investment Scheme in accordance with the appropriate regulation.
Shares can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
Shares of small and mid-size companies can be more volatile than shares of larger companies, and at times it may be difficult to value or to sell shares at desired times and prices, increasing the risk of losses.
Emerging markets expose the Fund to higher volatility and greater risk of loss than developed markets; they are susceptible to adverse political and economic events, and may be less well regulated with less robust custody and settlement procedures.
The Fund may use derivatives with the aim of reducing risk or managing the portfolio more efficiently. However this introduces other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
If the Fund holds assets in currencies other than the base currency of the Fund or you invest in a share class of a different currency to the Fund (unless 'hedged'), the value of your investment may be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.