Credit light cuts through the income darkness
Jenna Barnard and John Pattullo explain how credit markets navigated COVID with relative ease and why corporate bonds remain in the sweet spot for 2021.
- Credit markets have experienced a benign COVID crisis, supported by unprecedented fiscal and monetary policies of governments and central banks.
- We appear to be past the peak in default rates and downgrades with indications that credit (corporate bonds) could be in the sweet spot for 2021.
- Recent newsflow, the resilience of credit in 2020 and signs that companies are seeking to reduce leverage and improve balance sheets, support a positive outlook. However, locking in a sensible income is likely to remain a challenge for many in the years to come.
‘Idyllic’ is the word we have been using to describe the investment environment for corporate bonds, since March 2020. This is in stark contrast to the news flow surrounding the pandemic (the positive vaccine news only arrived in November) but a confluence of market factors served to make this economic crisis one which has had only minor ripples for credit (corporate bond) markets.
For once, credit was not the villain of the piece
It is worth noting that lenders (banks and credit markets) were not the villains of the piece on this occasion, as they have been in the last two economic downturns in which they either caused or exacerbated economic weakness. Rather, this time around, lenders have stepped up to bridge liquidity shortfalls for companies adversely affected by COVID‑19, ensuring that a liquidity crisis has not become a widespread solvency crisis for the large companies that access public capital markets.
Further, the key concern for corporate bond investors - solvency of the borrower or defaults - have been remarkably muted in aggregate and concentrated in obvious problem areas, which have disappointed for years, such as energy fracking companies in the US and traditional retailers in structural decline. Clearly, government and central bank support have played a crucial part in encouraging this generosity and putting a floor under the economy and capital markets. However, it has been a most unusual credit cycle, different to any experienced in living memory.
In the first few weeks of the COVID shock, we took the view that this is a liquidity rather than a solvency crisis (which subsequently proved to be correct and gradually became a consensus view after April). Thus, through March and early April, we increased our corporate bond exposure significantly (particularly in high yield) resulting in a substantial increase to income, and continued to do so in the ensuing months as opportunities presented.
The remarkable absence of a default cycle in high yield
Figure 1 shows the actual defaults experienced in the riskiest part of the corporate bond market, ie, high yield, in the US and Europe. At the height of the market crisis in March, the extreme economic downturn led credit rating agency Moody’s to forecast default rates of around 14% for both the US and Europe.
In contrast to the forecast, Europe has not experienced a major rise in default rates in 2020 - currently running at 4.1% defaults and peaking. In the US, although the high yield sector has suffered (again), default rates are remarkably similar to Europe at 2.6% - excluding energy and retail.
Figure 1: passing the peak in default rates
,Source: Moody’s, JP Morgan and Janus Henderson Investors, as at 31 October 2020
Note: HY = high yield.
Apart from in the very obvious sectors, there has not really been a default cycle in the high yield market. Its absence is remarkable and is a function of the government response and the willingness of credit (and in some cases equity) investors to provide monies to bridge the challenging months ahead. There have been pockets of defaults and problems of course, but it has not been a generalised cross sector default story. That is a very important point, and one that gets missed amid the doom and gloom.
Credit rating downgrade volumes reinforce the story. The surge in downgrades in the spring was expected but it collapsed very quickly and did not linger as in previous crises. With authorities’ support, the lights were switched back on in the corporate bond markets, which witnessed a surge in issuance, mainly in investment grade markets but also in high yield.
More clues in the banking sector
Looking at the other risky part of the credit markets, a similar pattern has emerged in the banking sector. Actual impairments have not been anywhere near as high as expectations when banks aggressively provisioned for future losses in their second quarter results.
Amazingly, for credit investors, this crisis has been beneficial for their bonds as banks across the UK, Europe and US built up equity capital levels despite their conservative provisioning. This was due to both strong organic earnings and the intervention of regulators who unilaterally banned ordinary dividends and share buybacks.
Figure 2 shows the total returns of the most subordinated, hybrid contingent convertible or ‘Coco’ bonds, recovering almost all their losses by the end of October compared to ordinary equity returns. This is an interesting example of the divergence between credit and equity performance in this cycle.
Figure 2: benign cycle for bank credit investors relative to equities
Source: Bloomberg, Janus Henderson Investors, as at 25 November 2020
Note: ICE BofA indices. Past performance is not a guide to future performance.
The outlook for credit investors remains encouraging
Since the height of the COVID crisis, companies have raised a war chest of cash and engaged in repairing their balance sheets. We believe that we are now past the peak in credit rating downgrades and lapping past the peak in default rates.
The outlook for credit investors remains encouraging, albeit tempered by the much lower yields on offer relative to Q2 and early Q3 of 2020. The backdrop, however, remains fundamentally positive, given we are in an early cycle environment in which debt investors continue to be treated preferentially relative to equity investors. This is a sweet spot for credit.
The positive vaccine news cements this outlook and 2021 looks set to be a more interesting year for central banks than credit investors. Should the economic recovery be stronger than their pessimistic forecasts, then the guidance of no rate hikes for the next few years will be tested. As will their willingness and ability to monetise government debt via continued quantitative easing programmes.
Coco bonds: contingent convertible notes, more commonly known as ‘cocos’, issued to enhance regulatory bank capital. The bonds are loss absorbing and are designed to prevent tax payer bailouts of banks in the future.
Credit: refers to bonds within fixed income markets where the borrower is not a sovereign or government entity. Typically, the borrower will be a company or an individual, and the borrowings will be in the form of bonds, loans or other fixed interest asset classes.
Credit cycle: reflects the expansion and contraction of access to credit (borrowing) over time. It is related to changes in the economy and the monetary policy pursued by central banks.
Credit market: a marketplace for investment in corporate bonds and associated derivatives.
Default: the failure of a debtor (such as a bond issuer) to pay interest or to return an original amount loaned when due.
Equity capital: funds paid into a business by investors in exchange for common or preferred stock. This represents the core funding of a business, to which debt funding may be added.
Fiscal policy: connected with government taxes, debts and spending.
High yield: corporate bonds rated below investment grade (BBB/Baa3) by major credit rating agencies such as Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s (S&P).
Hybrid bonds: subordinated debt instruments issued by non-financial companies or corporates. They are known as ‘hybrids’ because they combine characteristics of bonds and equities.
Leverage: the use of borrowing to increase exposure to an asset or market.
Liquidity: typically refers to a company's ability to use its current assets to meet its current or short-term liabilities.
Monetary policy: the policies of a central bank, aimed at influencing the level of inflation and growth in an economy. It includes controlling interest rates and the supply of money.
Solvency: the ability of a company to meet its long-term debts and financial obligations.
Structural decline: refers to when structural changes in society, including changing demographics, consumer behaviour, low-growth economics and technology-driven disruption, impact a business.
Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.
- An issuer of a bond (or money market instrument) may become unable or unwilling to pay interest or repay capital to the Fund. If this happens or the market perceives this may happen, the value of the bond will fall.
- When interest rates rise (or fall), the prices of different securities will be affected differently. In particular, bond values generally fall when interest rates rise. This risk is generally greater the longer the maturity of a bond investment.
- The Fund invests in high yield (non-investment grade) bonds and while these generally offer higher rates of interest than investment grade bonds, they are more speculative and more sensitive to adverse changes in market conditions.
- Callable debt securities, such as some asset-backed or mortgage-backed securities (ABS/MBS), give issuers the right to repay capital before the maturity date or to extend the maturity. Issuers may exercise these rights when favourable to them and as a result the value of the fund may be impacted.
- If a Fund has a high exposure to a particular country or geographical region it carries a higher level of risk than a Fund which is more broadly diversified.
- The Fund may use derivatives towards the aim of achieving its investment objective. This can result in 'leverage', which can magnify an investment outcome and gains or losses to the Fund may be greater than the cost of the derivative. Derivatives also introduce other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
- When the Fund, or a hedged share/unit class, seeks to mitigate exchange rate movements of a currency relative to the base currency, the hedging strategy itself may create a positive or negative impact to the value of the Fund due to differences in short-term interest rates between the currencies.
- Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
- Some or all of the ongoing charges may be taken from capital, which may erode capital or reduce potential for capital growth.
- The Fund may invest in contingent convertible bonds (CoCos), which can fall sharply in value if the financial strength of an issuer weakens and a predetermined trigger event causes the bonds to be converted into shares of the issuer or to be partly or wholly written off.
- The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.
- In addition to income, this share class may distribute realised and unrealised capital gains and original capital invested. Fees, charges and expenses are also deducted from capital. Both factors may result in capital erosion and reduced potential for capital growth. Investors should also note that distributions of this nature may be treated (and taxable) as income depending on local tax legislation.