Evaluating US growth equities in a market that remains murky
Through a rapidly changing market, growth equities – specifically, technology-centric businesses – have been hard hit. Yet, we anticipate innovation will continue to be a principal long-term driver in 2023.
5 minute read
- US large-cap growth equities – particularly innovation-driven sectors like technology – have suffered in 2022 following years of market leadership.
- While some macro forces may complicate future growth, secular themes continue to be supportive, and new themes are emerging against a changing market backdrop.
- Despite short-term challenges and longer-term structural shifts, we believe innovation will persist as a crucial driver of sustainable revenue growth and shareholder value.
The hallmark of large-cap growth equities in 2022 has been a dramatic reversal in performance. The overall market experienced the same performance whiplash, but innovation-driven areas like technology – which had produced outsized shareholder returns over prior years − have been particularly hard hit. That said, large-cap growth stocks have still outperformed the broader market and their value-oriented peers over the last three and five years.1
A reset in market valuations
Multiples could contract further as the market determines how to price stocks in anticipation of the ultimate resting point for interest rates and earnings in the coming year. That said, valuations are now at levels seen during the pandemic-induced sell-off in the spring of 2020. The Russell 1000 Growth Index is trading at roughly 21 times the next 12 months’ expected earnings per share, with expectations for roughly 13% earnings growth following a flat year of growth in 2022.2 While not extremely inexpensive by historical standards, we believe there are competitively advantaged, materially higher-growth companies now trading at valuations similar to the overall benchmark.
What can slow inflation?
The reset in valuations was triggered by stubborn inflation and the US Federal Reserve’s (Fed) forceful tightening of monetary policy in response. For inflation to fall, we will need to see easing in consumer strength, which has been supported in recent years by multiple factors, including government stimulus, rising wages, strong housing and capital markets, and pent-up demand.
Now, we are beginning to see consumers spend at a rate faster than income growth, which is unsustainable. Personal savings are also being drawn down, and there has been an uptick in the use of revolving (credit card) debt. These metrics all point to an eventual slowdown in consumer spending. We have begun to see initial signs that inflation may have peaked. The two most recent monthly consumer price index (CPI) readings have shown a moderation in prices, and we are also starting to see a decline in transactions for financeable goods, which could force prices lower.
At the same time as the Fed is negotiating resilient consumer demand, it is also dealing with the unexpected shock of the Russia-Ukraine war, which has kept upward pressure on prices, particularly in commodities. Any resolution of this or other geopolitical tensions could help further ease inflationary headwinds in the coming year.
How are secular investment themes being impacted?
We believe that all companies are, or need to be, “technology” companies to some extent. That is, they must decide how to harness and leverage technology to survive and grow in the long term. Thus, we believe that digital transformation across all segments of the economy – which we have talked about for some time – will continue.
More specifically, we think that long-term secular demand for semiconductors will increase in the coming years, driven in part by tailwinds such as the transition to greener energy production and increased adoption of electric vehicles (EVs). For example, physical assets such as agricultural equipment and commercial transportation, along with wind and solar farms, will be “smarter” in the future and require increased semiconductor content. Likewise, EVs will rely far more heavily on microchips than the internal-combustion vehicles they will replace.
We also continue to believe that all companies aspire to be more productive and more agile, and this requires continued investment in software. While we anticipate that growth will slow as we potentially enter a recession, we still expect these areas to expand well in excess of gross domestic product (GDP) growth.
Following a 40-year period of globalization − which drove some industrial functions to other nations and away from domestic manufacturing − we believe that the U.S. is now in a period of deglobalization and reindustrialization. Supply-chain issues and national security concerns, which were brought to a head by the pandemic and recent geopolitical strife, have helped solidify these long-term themes, which will fuel an increase in onshore production and accompanying automation.
Factory automation may be further spurred by increased labor costs, particularly in low-end wages, from the ending of global labor arbitrage. As economies deglobalize and barriers to trade and immigration are fortified, jobs will no longer necessarily move to areas where costs are cheapest. Along with an overall spike in wage growth, we have already seen faster increases among the lowest 25% of workers, as illustrated in Figure 1 below.
Figure 1: Monthly wage growth
Sources: Current Population Survey, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Calculations. The data are 12-month moving averages of monthly median wage growth for each average wage quartile.
What can drive individual company growth moving forward?
These secular trends, among others, can provide tailwinds in coming years. At the individual company level, as the cost of capital has increased, businesses that have relied on extremely cheap funding for growth will be tested. On the other hand, firms with competitive advantages that have significant cash on their balance sheets will have greater ability to invest for future growth, even in an economic downturn. These businesses may be able to accelerate market share gains, whereas weaker competitors could disappear.
Overall, we are increasingly excited about the opportunities we are seeing in growth equities. We are cognizant that we are entering a period of structurally higher rates and inflation. We also recognize that it may be more challenging for companies to expand valuation multiples and/or improve profit margins. That said, we take comfort in owning a concentrated set of innovative companies with significant competitive advantages and the potential to drive sustainable growth in revenue and cash flow.
1 As measured by the Russell 1000® Growth, S&P 500® and Russell 1000® Value Indices, data as of 6 December 2022.
2 Source: Bloomberg, as of 7 December 2022.
Russell 1000® Growth Index reflects the performance of U.S. large-cap equities with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
Consumer Price Index (CPI) is an unmanaged index representing the rate of inflation of the U.S. consumer prices as determined by the U.S. Department of Labor Statistics.
Technology industries can be significantly affected by obsolescence of existing technology, short product cycles, falling prices and profits, competition from new market entrants, and general economic conditions. A concentrated investment in a single industry could be more volatile than the performance of less concentrated investments and the market as a whole.
These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. Any securities, funds, sectors and indices mentioned within this article do not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to buy or sell them.
Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.
The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.
Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.
- Shares/Units can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
- Shares of small and mid-size companies can be more volatile than shares of larger companies, and at times it may be difficult to value or to sell shares at desired times and prices, increasing the risk of losses.
- If a Fund has a high exposure to a particular country or geographical region it carries a higher level of risk than a Fund which is more broadly diversified.
- This Fund may have a particularly concentrated portfolio relative to its investment universe or other funds in its sector. An adverse event impacting even a small number of holdings could create significant volatility or losses for the Fund.
- The Fund may use derivatives to help achieve its investment objective. This can result in leverage (higher levels of debt), which can magnify an investment outcome. Gains or losses to the Fund may therefore be greater than the cost of the derivative. Derivatives also introduce other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
- If the Fund holds assets in currencies other than the base currency of the Fund, or you invest in a share/unit class of a different currency to the Fund (unless hedged, i.e. mitigated by taking an offsetting position in a related security), the value of your investment may be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
- When the Fund, or a share/unit class, seeks to mitigate exchange rate movements of a currency relative to the base currency (hedge), the hedging strategy itself may positively or negatively impact the value of the Fund due to differences in short-term interest rates between the currencies.
- Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
- The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.