Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Quick view: European elections shift prospects for French banks and utilities - Janus Henderson Investors
For individual investors in Luxembourg

Quick view: European elections shift prospects for French banks and utilities

The French President’s surprise calling of a snap election in response to a stronger showing from the far right in the European election has driven volatility in French bonds. Hear from Janus Henderson’s credit team on whether this represents an opportunity or risk.

James Briggs, ACA, CFA

James Briggs, ACA, CFA

Portfolio Manager

Celia Soares

Celia Soares

Client Portfolio Manager

Soline Poulain

Soline Poulain

Credit Analyst

Romana Matouskova

Romana Matouskova

Credit Analyst

14 Jun 2024
8 minute read

Key takeaways:

  • French President Macron’s calling of a snap election has sent shudders across credit, particularly sovereign bonds, but also among utilities and banks bonds.
  • Whether National Rally gains an absolute or relative majority in the legislative elections could impact the policies affecting banks and utilities. Punitive measures on banks’ profits and a shift away from renewables are both risks.
  • We expect further volatility in the coming weeks as clarity unfolds around the outcome of the election and subsequent policies, which could create mispriced opportunities for active credit investors.

European markets have been volatile, with increased political risk being priced in as far-right parties gained representation in France, Germany and Italy in the European parliamentary elections last weekend. President Emmanuel Macron reacted to his party’s low score in the European vote by calling a snap election. While the timing surprised, the decision comes as Macron’s government had been lacking a parliamentary majority since 2022 and the alternative would have likely been three years of a lame-duck presidency.



European elections have typically been where the protest vote is expressed most strongly, while the legislative election has historically favoured more traditional parties. However, the far right is now more mainstream, in our view, than it has ever been in France. Below are the some of the potential scenarios that could potentially play out:

  • A National Rally absolute parliamentary majority – Macron would effectively be forced to appoint a National Rally prime minister, likely Jordan Bardella, who has been designated by his party for the role. With a majority under him, Bardella would in theory be able to decide on many topics such as pensions, employment, education, tax, immigration and nationality requirements, although the President retains significant powers and control of foreign, European and defence policies. This scenario would likely upset markets given the negative implications of National Rally’s public spending plans.
  • A National Rally relative majority where it becomes the largest single party in the National Assembly, but it has no absolute majority. The outcome would likely be an even more splintered parliament, which could result in a political and policy deadlock for the rest of Macron’s mandate, similar to the current situation.
  • A left-wing alliance: On Monday, left-wing parties agreed to form an alliance, but at the time of writing, leaders have not yet agreed on who will head the coalition nor on its programme. If the alliance is successful, it could potentially have substantial influence in legislative decision-making or even a relative majority, which in our view would likely be perceived by market as a risk in terms of the public deficit.

As markets digested the implications of different scenarios for France’s political future, risk aversion plagued the French bond market. The 10-year France-German government bond spread widened to levels seen during other risk-off events, such as the COVID pandemic – but not to levels seen during the 2012 eurozone crisis levels. This reflects elevated political risk exacerbated by the fears around France’s management of its precarious debt situation. Following Macron’s surprise election decision, Moody’s warned that its current “stable” outlook on France’s rating could be cut to “negative” if its debt metrics worsened further. This follows S&P’s downgrade last month, highlighting the French government’s missed goals in plans to restrain the budget deficit after huge spending during the COVID pandemic and energy crisis. Increased leverage in corporates has seen France grow from the second largest to the biggest participant in the Euro Corporate Index, with its share up from 16% at the end of 2000 to 23% at the end of 20231.

Figure 1: 10-year France-German sovereign spreads spike

Source: Bloomberg, Spread of the 10-year France Government Bond Index versus the 10-year German Government Bond Index, 12 June 2009 to 12 June 2024. Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.

Market volatility rippled across into corporates with weakness seen in the French banking and utility sectors. So what is the potential impact of a National Rally majority on the regulatory backdrop impacting these sectors and what is priced into markets?

Banks – a tax on banks?

Wider sovereign spreads can have an adverse impact on banks both fundamentally (eg. bond portfolio valuation, cost of funding) and in terms of market dynamics (eg. sentiment, liquidity). The impact of such widening should be limited by the fact that French universal banks such as BNP Paribas, Société Générale and Crédit Agricole are relatively well-diversified geographically and have lower domestic sovereign exposures than many of their eurozone peers.

At the time of writing, there have been very limited details on National Rally-led policies that could directly impact banks. While we cannot rule out punitive measures, we think a tax on bank profits – like in Spain and Italy – is unlikely to be a priority. French banks have benefited less from higher interest rates than banks in other countries, partly because bank loans and deposits are highly regulated already, which has put them at a competitive disadvantage in terms of revenue. National Rally-led policies could also lead to a higher budget deficit and a deterioration in France’s economic situation, driving further sovereign rating downgrades and banks’ ratings in turn.

French bank spreads have widened across the board but moves have so far been relatively muted. Bank bonds typically react more strongly to political and economic events, reflecting their strong link to the economy alongside sensitivity to market sentiment – given leveraged balance sheets and their ample liquidity. While we remain sanguine on French banks’ fundamental profiles, we take a more cautious stance on near-term French bank valuations as political risk remains elevated and spreads moves so far have been limited.

Utilities – shift away from renewables?

For the leveraged utility sector, there is potentially more of a direct impact from National Rally influence, as it has been campaigning on affordability measures and targeting energy bills. In its election manifesto, it advocates for an exit from the European electricity market rules, which has potential implications for utilities in general but particularly for fully government-owned EDF. Given this ownership, we believe it is the most exposed name to political intervention. Possible risks for EDF include:

  • An impact on profitability from higher taxes and a lowering in retail energy tariffs if an exit from the European electricity market rules is achieved.
  • An acceleration of capital expenditure, as National Rally is pro nuclear and the party’s manifesto has ambitious and possibly unrealistic targets around the construction pace of new reactors.
  • Reduction of renewable energy targets, as the party has a lukewarm relationship to renewables.
  • Management reshuffle, which could be disruptive considering the recent CEO change.

In the past, EDF has been used as a political tool to manage energy bills in France. That said, implementation of negative measures would be inconsistent with the need to build new nuclear reactors (supported by Le Pen). After all, achievement of this punchy target requires a financially stable and resilient company to carry out these operations and ensure its financing.

Higher taxes also could impact partially government-owned utility Engie. A major pivot in France’s approach to renewable energy might put into question the company’s growth strategy, heavily based on a renewables rollout. That said, a significant share of Engie’s renewable capital expenditure is outside France and the situation could also translate into lower near-term investment needs, which would offset the credit implications for the company in the short term. Deceleration of energy transition in France could also result in lower capex needs for the regulated assets, which would in turn improve leverage trajectory albeit at the cost of future growth. We believe there are limited risks for such regulated names – as regulatory regimes are fairly resilient to political interventions – and water companies where, unlike in the UK, the water sector has not been so intensely politicised.

Political risk can overshadow fundamentals

We have seen an increase in leverage in some utilities across Europe over the last couple of decades. And even where there are no direct policy implications, any changes to new, or non-mainstream, political parties create a risk of policy change when financial strength to adapt is somewhat diminished. So while near-term negative implications may be limited, the recent trouble in the UK water sector, for example, shows what can happen when leverage is elevated, politicians are involved, and operational performance is challenged. Elevated political risk can nonetheless lead to some contagion in parts of the market where fundamentals remain strong or result in higher financing costs for the affected names. We expect further volatility to arise in utilities as clarity unfolds.

Political risk can thus cast a shadow over company fundamentals and create mispriced opportunities. Identifying where such political risks could legitimately impact fundamentals is key for selective credit investors. An interesting market dynamic to note is amid the sell-off in the French names, the weakness in the sterling investment grade market was more pronounced. This serves as a reminder that even among the volatility opportunities can arise where you least expect them.

1Source: Bloomberg, ICE BofA Euro Corporate Index, 31 December 2023.


Balance sheet: A financial statement that summarises a company’s assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity at a particular point in time. Each segment gives investors an idea as to what the company owns and owes, as well as the amount invested by shareholders. It is called a balance sheet because of the accounting equation: assets = liabilities + shareholders’ equity.

Credit market: A marketplace for investment in corporate bonds, government debt and associated derivatives.

Credit rating: An independent assessment of the creditworthiness of a borrower by a recognised agency such as Standard & Poors, Moody’s or Fitch. Standardised scores such as ‘AAA’ (a high credit rating) or ‘B’ (a low credit rating) are used, although other agencies may present their ratings in different formats.

Deficit: A deficit occurs when expenses exceed revenues (or taxation), imports exceed exports, or liabilities exceed assets, over a specific time period.

Fundamental analysis: The analysis of information that contributes to the valuation of a security, such as a company’s earnings or the evaluation of its management team, as well as wider economic factors. This contrasts with technical analysis, which is centred on idiosyncrasies within financial markets, such as detecting seasonal patterns.

Investment-grade: A bond typically issued by governments or companies perceived to have a relatively low risk of defaulting on their payments, reflected in the higher rating given to them by credit ratings agencies.

Leverage is an interchangeable term for gearing: the ratio of a company’s loan capital (debt) to the value of its ordinary shares (equity); it can also be expressed in other ways such as net debt as a multiple of earnings, typically net debt/EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation). Higher leverage equates to higher debt levels.

Volatility: The rate and extent at which the price of a portfolio, security or index, moves up and down. If the price swings up and down with large movements, it has high volatility. If the price moves more slowly and to a lesser extent, it has lower volatility. The higher the volatility the higher the risk of the investment.


Fixed income securities are subject to interest rate, inflation, credit and default risk. The bond market is volatile. As interest rates rise, bond prices usually fall, and vice versa. The return of principal is not guaranteed, and prices may decline if an issuer fails to make timely payments or its credit strength weakens. There is no guarantee that past trends will continue, or forecasts will be realised.

These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. References made to individual securities do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, investment strategy or market sector, and should not be assumed to be profitable. Janus Henderson Investors, its affiliated advisor, or its employees, may have a position in the securities mentioned.


Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.


The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.


Marketing Communication.






Important information

Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.

Janus Henderson Capital Funds Plc is a UCITS established under Irish law, with segregated liability between funds. Investors are warned that they should only make their investments based on the most recent Prospectus which contains information about fees, expenses and risks, which is available from all distributors and paying/facilities agents, it should be read carefully. This is a marketing communication. Please refer to the prospectus of the UCITS and to the KIID before making any final investment decisions. The rate of return may vary and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate due to market and foreign exchange movements. Shares, if redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. This is not a solicitation for the sale of shares and nothing herein is intended to amount to investment advice. Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. may decide to terminate the marketing arrangements of this Collective Investment Scheme in accordance with the appropriate regulation.
    Specific risks
  • An issuer of a bond (or money market instrument) may become unable or unwilling to pay interest or repay capital to the Fund. If this happens or the market perceives this may happen, the value of the bond will fall.
  • When interest rates rise (or fall), the prices of different securities will be affected differently. In particular, bond values generally fall when interest rates rise (or are expected to rise). This risk is typically greater the longer the maturity of a bond investment.
  • The Fund invests in high yield (non-investment grade) bonds and while these generally offer higher rates of interest than investment grade bonds, they are more speculative and more sensitive to adverse changes in market conditions.
  • Some bonds (callable bonds) allow their issuers the right to repay capital early or to extend the maturity. Issuers may exercise these rights when favourable to them and as a result the value of the Fund may be impacted.
  • Emerging markets expose the Fund to higher volatility and greater risk of loss than developed markets; they are susceptible to adverse political and economic events, and may be less well regulated with less robust custody and settlement procedures.
  • If a Fund has a high exposure to a particular country or geographical region it carries a higher level of risk than a Fund which is more broadly diversified.
  • The Fund may use derivatives to help achieve its investment objective. This can result in leverage (higher levels of debt), which can magnify an investment outcome. Gains or losses to the Fund may therefore be greater than the cost of the derivative. Derivatives also introduce other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
  • If the Fund holds assets in currencies other than the base currency of the Fund, or you invest in a share/unit class of a different currency to the Fund (unless hedged, i.e. mitigated by taking an offsetting position in a related security), the value of your investment may be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
  • When the Fund, or a share/unit class, seeks to mitigate exchange rate movements of a currency relative to the base currency (hedge), the hedging strategy itself may positively or negatively impact the value of the Fund due to differences in short-term interest rates between the currencies.
  • Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
  • Some or all of the ongoing charges may be taken from capital, which may erode capital or reduce potential for capital growth.
  • The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.
  • In addition to income, this share class may distribute realised and unrealised capital gains and original capital invested. Fees, charges and expenses are also deducted from capital. Both factors may result in capital erosion and reduced potential for capital growth. Investors should also note that distributions of this nature may be treated (and taxable) as income depending on local tax legislation.