For individual investors in Luxembourg

Lessons learned: listed REITs’ more prudent approach to leverage

Guy Barnard, CFA

Guy Barnard, CFA

Co-Head of Global Property Equities | Portfolio Manager

Tim Gibson

Tim Gibson

Co-Head of Global Property Equities | Portfolio Manager

Greg Kuhl, CFA

Greg Kuhl, CFA

Portfolio Manager

1 Jul 2022
5 minute read

Key takeaways:

  • Post Global Financial Crisis (GFC), many listed real estate investment trusts (REITs) now have lower leverage, higher liquidity, and continuous access to capital markets, leaving the asset class on a firmer footing.
  • Listed REITs have largely fixed rate debt, effectively reducing exposure to rising rates and many are investment grade.
  • Listed REITs are currently undervalued versus non-traded real estate despite owning comparable assets. Valuations should eventually return to the parity at which they have historically traded.

The structural decline in bond yields and interest rates have undoubtedly been a tailwind for real estate investors in recent years. Now with rates on the rise, and credit markets experiencing turbulence, there’s a looming fear that ‘the music may stop’ and the run of strong performance may come to an end.

REITs are priced daily by stock markets and tend to adjust quickly to such uncertainty, with the result being that meaningful valuation declines have effectively been priced in already (US REITs have declined 20% year-to-date to 28 June 2022)1. Conversely, private real estate valuations, that are by nature backward looking, are still reporting gains year to date (the largest US non-traded REIT is up 6.7% this year to the end of May)2 – only time will tell if these valuations are accurate.

What is certain however, is that the listed REIT sector is not in the same vulnerable place it was in before the GFC. Unlike many of their private sector counterparts, most REITs have not indulged in overenthusiastic borrowing over the past decade. Instead, they have maintained discipline, avoiding the trap of taking on excessive financial leverage (debt) when asset prices were appreciating. Scars from the GFC changed the way many listed REIT companies operated. Balance sheets have been fortified, meaning that if the asset class heads into a potential US recession, it does so in the best financial health. With lower leverage, stronger liquidity, and continuous access to capital markets, the listed real estate sector stands on a considerably firmer footing.

Today is NOT 2008/2009 for REITs

Balance sheets matter for any real estate investor, even more so during periods of rising uncertainty, higher borrowing costs, and lower availability of capital. Operating with higher financial leverage adds financial risk into the return profile of real estate. Leverage can enhance returns on the way up, but it can also exacerbate negative returns on the way down. If real estate yields rise sharply, as is being predicted by the public markets, more highly levered vehicles are likely to experience more drastic declines in equity values versus those that have taken a more prudent approach.

The listed REIT sector falls into the latter camp, with leverage (measured as the ratio of debt to total assets) at a more than two decade historic low of just 28% (Figure 1). This represents a 18% decline compared to the end of 2007, and 37% decline from the peak of the GFC. Crucially, listed REITs have successfully achieved lower leverage in this property cycle by relying more heavily on raising equity capital and joint ventures rather than debt to fund acquisition and development efforts.

Longer-term debt reduces the impact of rising rates

Over the last decade, it has been general practice for listed REITs to ladder their debt in a way that matches the term of their leases with tenants. This has the effect of spreading the refinancing risk over several years. The weighted average maturity of debt of US REITs today is c.7.3 years, versus just 5.3 years at the end of 2007 (Figure 2). In addition, many REITs have been benefiting from fixing a large proportion of their debt at the more attractive funding rates of recent years, with a typical range between 75% to 95% fixed-rate debt today.3 According to Morgan Stanley Research, in fact, only around 11% of total US REIT debt is maturing in 2022-23, at an average rate of 3.3%. Refinancing into a higher rate environment assuming a rate of 5.5% would only be a circa 2.0% headwind to REIT cash flows.

With long term and largely fixed financing in place, the reduced exposure to rising interest rates means there is likely to be less impact on REIT earnings in the short term. Healthy balance sheets coupled with revenue growth driven by a robust supply and demand fundamental backdrop should support rising dividends for shareholders in the coming years.

A key REIT advantage: access to capital

Continuous access to permanent capital afforded by the public equity and debt markets is a significant advantage to listed REITs in economic downturns. A key characteristic of the asset class is that the vast majority of listed REITs have investment grade credit ratings. In 2019, 68 US REITs had an investment grade rating, versus just 44 in 2006 as reported by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (Nareit). This provides listed REITs with significantly more flexibility compared to private managers almost exclusively reliant on mortgages that are tied to a specific property or properties.

With an investment grade stamp that reflects stronger balance sheets, many listed REITs are likely to have the flexibility to invest, ramp up external growth activity, and take advantage of any potential distress in the private markets.

Balance sheet quality ultimately matters most when macro risks are highest. While investors who follow listed REITs daily are aware of the strides the industry has made, generalist investors or those more familiar with private real estate often assume listed REITs are much more levered than they really are. Many still view the industry through a pre-2008 lens. Based on the data that we can see today, those concerns seem rather misplaced.

Same assets, different prices

  1. Source: Bloomberg, FTSE Nareit Equity REITs Index USD (FNRE), year-to-date returns to 28 June 2022.
  2. Source: largest US non-traded REIT factcard as at 31 May 2022.
  3. Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence as at 30 June 2022.
Definition of terms Expand

These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. References made to individual securities do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, investment strategy or market sector, and should not be assumed to be profitable. Janus Henderson Investors, its affiliated advisor, or its employees, may have a position in the securities mentioned.


Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.


The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.


Marketing Communication.






Important information

Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.

The Janus Henderson Horizon Fund (the “Fund”) is a Luxembourg SICAV incorporated on 30 May 1985, managed by Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. may decide to terminate the marketing arrangements of this Collective Investment Scheme in accordance with the appropriate regulation. This is a marketing communication. Please refer to the prospectus of the UCITS and to the KIID before making any final investment decisions.
    Specific risks
  • Shares/Units can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
  • The Fund is focused towards particular industries or investment themes and may be heavily impacted by factors such as changes in government regulation, increased price competition, technological advancements and other adverse events.
  • This Fund may have a particularly concentrated portfolio relative to its investment universe or other funds in its sector. An adverse event impacting even a small number of holdings could create significant volatility or losses for the Fund.
  • The Fund invests in real estate investment trusts (REITs) and other companies or funds engaged in property investment, which involve risks above those associated with investing directly in property. In particular, REITs may be subject to less strict regulation than the Fund itself and may experience greater volatility than their underlying assets.
  • The Fund may use derivatives with the aim of reducing risk or managing the portfolio more efficiently. However this introduces other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
  • If the Fund holds assets in currencies other than the base currency of the Fund, or you invest in a share/unit class of a different currency to the Fund (unless hedged, i.e. mitigated by taking an offsetting position in a related security), the value of your investment may be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
  • When the Fund, or a share/unit class, seeks to mitigate exchange rate movements of a currency relative to the base currency (hedge), the hedging strategy itself may positively or negatively impact the value of the Fund due to differences in short-term interest rates between the currencies.
  • Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
  • Some or all of the ongoing charges may be taken from capital, which may erode capital or reduce potential for capital growth.
  • The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.
  • In addition to income, this share class may distribute realised and unrealised capital gains and original capital invested. Fees, charges and expenses are also deducted from capital. Both factors may result in capital erosion and reduced potential for capital growth. Investors should also note that distributions of this nature may be treated (and taxable) as income depending on local tax legislation.