Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility A "monetarist" perspective on current equity markets - January 2022 - Janus Henderson Investors
For financial professionals in Norway

A “monetarist” perspective on current equity markets – January 2022

Simon Ward

Simon Ward

Economic Adviser

7 Jan 2022

Monetary indicators have weakened further over the last three months and are signalling a slowdown in global economic momentum during H1 2022 along with a loss of “excess” money support for markets.

Global six-month real narrow money growth peaked in July 2020 and fell significantly during 2021 – see chart 1. Real money trends typically lead economic momentum by six to 12 months. The global manufacturing PMI new orders index – a timely indicator of goods demand momentum – peaked in May 2021, falling over the summer but stabilising in Q4. With real money growth continuing to weaken into November, the PMI decline is expected to resume, with a low unlikely to be reached until mid-2022 at the earliest.

Industrial output numbers rebounded in late 2021 as supply constraints eased, allowing earlier orders to be fulfilled and inventories replenished. The monetary signal of weakening demand momentum argues that this pick-up will prove short-lived.

Monetary support for markets depends not on the absolute level of real money growth but rather its deviation from the rate required to support economic expansion, i.e. “excess” money growth. Two proxy measures are monitored here: the gap between six-month growth rates of real narrow money and industrial output; and the deviation of annual real money growth from a long-term moving average. Over 1970-2021, global equities outperformed US dollar cash by 17.7% per annum when the two measures were positive (allowing for data reporting lags) but underperformed by 9.2% when both were negative.

A double positive “buy” signal was issued at the end of April 2020 but a double negative “sell” now appears imminent. The second of the two measures turned negative in October 2021 and the first appears to have done so in November – confirmation awaits additional industrial output data to be released in early January.

Economic prospects for H2 2022 have yet to crystallise and will partly reflect monetary developments early in the year. Cycle analysis, however, suggests a further loss of momentum. Specifically, the global stockbuilding cycle, which averages 3.33 years, is scheduled to reach another low in 2023, implying that a downswing will begin during 2022. Such downswings are usually associated with significant economic weakness and underperformance of cyclical assets.

Could weakness tip over into a full-scale recession in 2022-23? This is not the central case here, for two reasons. First, global six-month real narrow money momentum usually turns negative before recessions but, though weak, remains positive currently, with stabilisation / recovery possible in early 2022. Secondly, the longer-term business investment and housing cycles are scheduled to remain in upswings in 2022-23 – recessions are usually associated with joint cycle downswings.

US economic and equity market outperformance in 2020-21, on the view here, reflected much stronger money growth in the US than elsewhere – chart 2. Six-month real narrow money growth is now slightly lower than in the rest of the G7, suggesting dimmer relative prospects, although US equities are usually defensive in a slowing economic environment.

China was a monetary laggard in 2020-21 but six-month real narrow money growth has stabilised and is now in the middle of the range across major economies. Broad money growth up has picked up and the recent Q4 PBoC bankers’ survey suggests that loan officers have been instructed to increase credit supply. Stronger narrow money numbers would confirm an improving outlook, although a significant recovery in economic growth is unlikely until later in 2022 and could be held back by global weakness.

Money trends appear relatively favourable elsewhere in the Asia-Pacific region, with real money growth picking up recently in Australia and the ASEAN economies and remaining solid in Korea / Taiwan.

The suggested scenario of a global economic slowdown would be expected – based on the experience of recent decades – to be associated with a dovish revision to monetary policy expectations and downward pressure on Treasury yields. Will unfavourable inflation news force the Fed and other central banks to maintain or accelerate tightening plans in 2022 despite fading economic momentum? The expectation here is that inflation will slow significantly in 2022, although monetary trends are not yet consistent with a return to the pre-pandemic norm.

Chart 3 shows that the surge in US six-month core CPI momentum in 2021 mirrored a surge in broad money growth 14 months earlier. This is a shorter lag than typically found in historical studies but the inflationary process may have been accelerated by supply-side disruption due to the pandemic. The apparent relationship suggests a slowdown in core CPI momentum in H1 2022 but current broad money growth remains above the pre-pandemic average, arguing against a full reversal of the 2020-21 rise.

Headline inflation rates, however, are likely to fall more sharply and may move below core rates later in 2022 as commodity prices soften with economic momentum.

The judgement here is that inflation progress will be sufficient to sustain the normal relationship between Treasury yields and economic momentum, i.e. yields are likely to remain capped in the near term and fall later in 2022. The recent supposed “hawkish pivot” by the Fed is not expected to be sustained, with a shift back to the “transitory” narrative likely as economic / inflation data cool and mid-term elections approach.

The suggestion of a decline in Treasury yields in 2022-23 is consistent with the stockbuilding cycle – yields usually reach a low within several months of the cycle trough, which is scheduled for around mid-2023 if the current cycle conforms to the average length.

The stockbuilding cycle is a significant influence on market behaviour more generally. In equity markets, defensive sectors, quality and high yield usually outperform in the 18 months leading up to a cycle trough – see table.

The weakness of EM equities in 2021 was a departure from the usual pattern of outperformance during cycle upswings and – on the view here – reflected monetary tightness in China, which now dominates the asset class. This raises the possibility that Chinese monetary loosening will support above-average performance during the downswing – confirmation that narrow money growth is following a recovery elsewhere in EM Asia could warrant at least a neutral weighting.

These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. References made to individual securities do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, investment strategy or market sector, and should not be assumed to be profitable. Janus Henderson Investors, its affiliated advisor, or its employees, may have a position in the securities mentioned.


Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.


The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.


Marketing Communication.