For financial professionals in Norway

Damage control: has the Fed learned its lesson?

Jason England

Jason England

Portfolio Manager


16 Jun 2022

Portfolio Manager Jason England explains why the US Federal Reserve (Fed) had little choice but to “go big” at this week’s policy meeting and, despite the rate hike, the central bank has yet to reach peak hawkishness.

Key takeaways

  • The Fed attempted to re-establish its credibility by acknowledging that the challenge posed by multi-decade high inflation requires a proportionate response.
  • Despite the three-quarter point move, we doubt the Fed has reached peak hawkishness, owing to the complex nature of this bout of inflation.
  • The year’s bond sell-off has left the yield curve flatter and investors pondering what maturities offer the best risk-return profile in a still uncertain – and volatile – market.

Chairman Jerome Powell and other voting members of the Federal Reserve (Fed) had a singular objective during this week’s meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee: Regain control of the narrative that the central bank actually grasped the magnitude of the threat posed to the U.S. economy by the highest inflation in four decades and that it has the resolve to make the necessary policy adjustments to confront this challenge. Recently – and as evidenced by this year’s spectacular rise in yields across the Treasuries curve – the market has been making its own assessment of the Fed’s ability to manage inflation and guide the economy toward a soft landing.

In a bow to reality, the Fed raised its benchmark overnight rate by 75 basis points (bps) and made notable adjustments within its updated Summary of Economic Projections for policy rates, including raising its year-end 2022 forecast to 3.4% from 1.9% in March. We view these steps as necessary damage control, remedying problems of the Fed’s own doing. It botched its transitory inflation call and then inexplicably seemed to take a 75 bps move off the table at its last meeting. While we appreciate the power of forward guidance, in certain instances that tactic and being data dependent are mutually exclusive. We’d categorize 8.6% headline consumer price inflation as an outlier event, which should be met with an equally extraordinary policy response, including abandoning its heretofore methodical approach to rate increases.

A tall task made taller

The contributions to this year’s generational inflation are myriad: a post-pandemic demand surge, supply-chain dislocations, the war in Ukraine and record monetary and fiscal stimulus, including the Fed expanding its own asset base by as much as $4.8 trillion since the end of 2019. These ingredients include both supply and demand factors. Managing them through policy was always going to be a tough order – and they still are. The Fed’s call for peak inflation was premature. Consequently, we believe that even with today’s rate increase the Fed has yet to arrive at peak hawkishness. In contrast to the last meeting, Chairman Powell evaded boxing himself into a corner as he left the possibility of yet another 75 bps rate hike on the table. Possibly a lesson learned.

Federal Reserve balance sheet

Multiple factors have contributed to multi-decade high inflation, including record levels of monetary and fiscal stimulus, with the former being slowly unwound.

Source: Bloomberg, Janus Henderson, as of 15 June 2022.

Diverging views

At its March meeting, the Fed projected that the overnight rate would finish the year at 1.9%, only slightly below the 2.0% rate implied in futures prices at that time. Since then, traders have rung the inflation alarm. By Wednesday, year-end 2022 expectation in the futures market for the policy rate was 3.5%, just above the Fed’s new projection of 3.4%. Yet divergence between market views and that of the Fed remain. Of note, is the de minimis increase in the Fed’s projection for the neutral rate – the level that over the long term is neither inflationary nor weighs on employment. At 2.5%, it is still below the 3.6% projected by futures contracts with maturities of three years and longer. Much depends upon whether the Fed’s expectation for inflation, as measured by its preferred gauge, slides from 4.3% this year to 2.3% in 2024. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) imply that inflation will average 4.1% over the two-year period.

Updated trajectory of rates based on summary of economic projections

As recently as December 2021, the Fed predicted that year-end 2022 policy rates would rest below 1.0%. They’ve since converged to levels already reflected in financial markets.

Source: Bloomberg, as of 15 June 2022.

A missed opportunity

We have long stated that the bond market could absorb an orderly exit from the era of extraordinarily accommodative monetary policy as investors had the opportunity to reinvest maturing securities at modestly higher interest rates. The possibility of that scenario coming to fruition has passed, as evidenced by the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index’s -12.65% year-to-date return through June 14. Instead, rather than taking their cues from a circumspect Fed, Treasuries prices have paid much greater attention to surging inflation. The result is higher yields across the curve, especially along the front end, which are typically more tightly tethered to policy rates.

US Treasuries yield curve in 2022

Yields across all maturities have risen in 2022 as the curve has flattened, leaving investors wondering which securities present the most attractive risk-reward profile.

Source: Bloomberg, as of 15 June 2022.

Inflation’s surge has pushed 2-year U.S. Treasury yields up by roughly 250 bps in 2022. The result has been a flattening yield curve as investors price in the likelihood of recession as the cost of capital increases. Such an outcome, however, is not our baseline scenario – at least for the near term. The economy, as reflected in Powell’s comments, remains on sound footing. Yet continued strength, especially the higher wages that accompany a tight labor market, is inflationary in its own right.  When combined with supply-side factors such as lockdowns in China and commodities constraints, the inflationary outlook is far from settled. And even with today’s rate hike, the real yield – that is nominal yields minus inflation – on the 2-year Treasury is still negative. Policy is tightening but remains accommodative.

Given these factors, we believe bond market volatility will remain elevated, with the longer-dated maturities – given their conflicted view between persistent inflation and recession – likely exhibiting larger price swings than those along the front end of the curve. It is our view that this year’s fierce upward move in shorter-dated yields has left them potentially closer to what the market can expect for the trajectory of policy rates over the next 24 months. With yields between these two sets of maturities fairly close, we don’t believe the incremental yield of holding longer-dated securities is worth the elevated risks in a still uncertain macro environment.

 

Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based measure of the investment grade, US dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market.

A yield curve plots the yields (interest rate) of bonds with equal credit quality but differing maturity dates. Typically bonds with longer maturities have higher yields.

These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. Any securities, funds, sectors and indices mentioned within this article do not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to buy or sell them.

 

Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.

 

The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.

 

Marketing Communication.

 

Glossary

 

 

 

Important information

Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.

Janus Henderson Capital Funds Plc is a UCITS established under Irish law, with segregated liability between funds. Investors are warned that they should only make their investments based on the most recent Prospectus which contains information about fees, expenses and risks, which is available from all distributors and paying/facilities agents, it should be read carefully. This is a marketing communication. Please refer to the prospectus of the UCITS and to the KIID before making any final investment decisions. The rate of return may vary and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate due to market and foreign exchange movements. Shares, if redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. This is not a solicitation for the sale of shares and nothing herein is intended to amount to investment advice. Henderson Management SA may decide to terminate the marketing arrangements of this Collective Investment Scheme in accordance with the appropriate regulation.
    Specific risks
  • An issuer of a bond (or money market instrument) may become unable or unwilling to pay interest or repay capital to the Fund. If this happens or the market perceives this may happen, the value of the bond will fall. High yielding (non-investment grade) bonds are more speculative and more sensitive to adverse changes in market conditions.
  • When interest rates rise (or fall), the prices of different securities will be affected differently. In particular, bond values generally fall when interest rates rise. This risk is generally greater the longer the maturity of a bond investment.
  • Callable debt securities, such as some asset-backed or mortgage-backed securities (ABS/MBS), give issuers the right to repay capital before the maturity date or to extend the maturity. Issuers may exercise these rights when favourable to them and as a result the value of the fund may be impacted.
  • Emerging markets expose the Fund to higher volatility and greater risk of loss than developed markets; they are susceptible to adverse political and economic events, and may be less well regulated with less robust custody and settlement procedures.
  • The Fund may use derivatives towards the aim of achieving its investment objective. This can result in 'leverage', which can magnify an investment outcome and gains or losses to the Fund may be greater than the cost of the derivative. Derivatives also introduce other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
  • If the Fund holds assets in currencies other than the base currency of the Fund or you invest in a share/unit class of a different currency to the Fund (unless 'hedged'), the value of your investment may be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
  • When the Fund, or a hedged share/unit class, seeks to mitigate exchange rate movements of a currency relative to the base currency, the hedging strategy itself may create a positive or negative impact to the value of the Fund due to differences in short-term interest rates between the currencies.
  • Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
  • The Fund involves a high level of buying and selling activity and as such will incur a higher level of transaction costs than a fund that trades less frequently. These transaction costs are in addition to the Fund's Ongoing Charges.
  • Some or all of the ongoing charges may be taken from capital, which may erode capital or reduce potential for capital growth.
  • The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.
  • In addition to income, this share class may distribute realised and unrealised capital gains and original capital invested. Fees, charges and expenses are also deducted from capital. Both factors may result in capital erosion and reduced potential for capital growth. Investors should also note that distributions of this nature may be treated (and taxable) as income depending on local tax legislation.