Private vs. listed property pricing disconnect signals opportunities
The Global Property Equities Team questions and examines the dispersion in returns between private and public real estate, which strengthens the case for listed property.
8 minute read
- Despite owning similar assets, private and listed real estate have a returns gap of over 30% this year, while listed REITs are trading at a historically-wide discount of more than 20% to NAV.
- Valuation methodology, less transparent and infrequent reporting for private real estate might partly explain the dispersion, but some of listed’s characteristics should actually benefit the asset class relative to private.
- The team believes listed property is attractive now given the valuation differential will eventually dissipate.
2022 has thus far been a brutal year for investors in just about every corner of the public capital markets be it debt, equity, or real estate investment trusts (REITs) with year-to-date total returns to 30 September (US markets) of approximately -15%, -24%, and -28% respectively.1 Persistently high inflation, a dramatic shift in central bank monetary policy, and increasing probability of recession are largely to blame for weak investor sentiment and disappointing returns.
However, private property managers seem to be operating above the fray and impervious to current headwinds, reporting strong returns of 9-13% thus far.2 An astute observer might ask, how is this returns dispersion between public (listed) and private real estate possible?
Not the reason no.1: listed property assets tend to be higher quality
One potential explanation for the dispersion in public versus private real estate returns could be a difference in underlying asset exposure either by geography, asset quality, or property type. Very little collective data on private real estate is publicly available. That’s why it is difficult to draw conclusions when it comes to the quality characteristics of private assets. But we do know that listed REITs typically own high quality assets concentrated in major population centres and agree with a recent statement in the Journal of Portfolio Management that “REITs generally engage in low-risk core real estate investment strategies focused on high-quality stabilised properties.” 3
Our experience in real estate markets tells us that most public or private market participants would agree that listed REITs on average, own higher-quality assets than their private counterparts. Given their transparent and detailed quarterly reporting, we can also observe that listed REITs continue to have strong operating fundamentals. In fact, Q2 2022 was the strongest quarter of reported results compared to expectations in 15 years according to Citi Research.4
Figure 1: Reported earnings versus estimates for US REITs
Source: Citi Research: Weekly REIT and Lodging Strategy, 12 August 2022. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Not the reason no.2: exposure to different property types
In terms of property type exposure, there are some observable differences between public and private real estate as shown in figure 2. Private core funds are nearly 50% allocated to office and retail which are traditional core property types experiencing long-term structural headwinds associated with new approaches to working from home and the proliferation of ecommerce. Public real estate on the other hand, offers specialist property types such as manufactured housing, self-storage, life science offices, and tech real estate, that are being driven by powerful, secular long-term trends such as demographics, digitalisation, convenience lifestyle and sustainability. These differences appear to once again favour listed REITs.
Figure 2: Listed property offers more diversified and specialist property types compared to private’s large allocation to traditional core
Source: NCREIF, FTSE as at 31 December 2021.
Not the reason no.3: listed property balance sheets are stronger
Perhaps listed REITs operate with higher leverage and riskier balance sheets than private managers, and in a world of rising rates that is an explanation for the vast gulf in year-to-date performance? Once again, this argument doesn’t hold water. US listed REITs currently employ around 30% leverage (the ratio of debt to total assets) and only circa 17% of this debt is tied to floating rates.5 In contrast, private real estate managers may use up to 60-70% leverage6 and can have more than 50% floating rate debt.7
So, if we accept that listed REITs’ property quality and fundamentals are at least ‘on par’ with private real estate, and that listed REIT property type exposure is at least as favorable as private real estate, and that listed REIT balance sheets are less risky than private real estate, again, how can we explain a gap in reported year-to-date returns of over 30%?8
Same assets, different prices
We believe what we are witnessing is a real time, very extreme, example of private valuation lag. Listed REITs are traded daily, as such they tend to ‘price in’ new information like higher interest rates and recession risk in a matter of days or weeks. In contrast, there is no third-party market for private real estate funds, and the managers of these funds instead rely on appraisals and desktop analysis to report a valuation to their investors on a monthly or quarterly basis.
When considering the timeliness of private real estate valuations, there are some important nuances to understand:
- Private valuations are mainly based on third-party appraisals. Appraisals rely heavily on transactional comparables (comps), ie. closed transactions involving similar or equivalent buildings. Commercial real estate transactions take six months or longer to market, negotiate, finance, and close. This means that pricing data from a transaction that closes today is always about six months out-of-date.
- When market conditions change rapidly, as has happened this year, there tends to be a wide gap between buyer and seller price expectations, which often leads to lower transaction volumes and fewer recent comps.
- Private equity real estate managers typically appraise each building in their portfolio only once per year. This infrequent valuation further delays reported realisation of changes in asset value.
We believe private real estate valuation methodology is designed to move slowly and smooth reported returns rather than to express the most current ‘on the ground’ values. It can take 18 months or longer for changes in market conditions to become fully reflected in reported private real estate valuations, as expressed in the hypothetical illustration (figure 3).
Figure 3: Private valuation lags affect the value of the underlying real estate
Source: Janus Henderson Investors analysis. For illustrative purposes only. CRE= commercial real estate, PE= private real estate.
To put the current situation in context, we believe it is informative to look at the discount to Net Asset Value (NAV). NAV is a proxy for private market real estate value at which listed REITs currently trade. Over the long term, listed REITs have traded in line with the private market value of their assets (historically 0.7% discount on average), according to analysis from Green Street Advisors. As at 30 September, listed REITs traded at a 28% discount to NAV. This is a rare occurrence and discounts of this level or greater are statistically expected to occur less than 1% of the time (see figure 4).
Figure 4: Probability distribution of NAV premium/discount
Source: Green Street Advisors, Janus Henderson Investors analysis. NAV premium/discount, equal weighted, monthly data from November 2007 to September 2022.
The truth will come out
In closing, we think it is worth pointing out that we’ve been here before. Figure 5 shows the performance of public versus private real estate holdings as reported by more than 200 US public plans. 2008, as many will remember, was another very challenging year for financial markets. In that year, listed REITs posted a 38% decline against only an 8% reported decline for private real estate. The valuation lag caught up to private real estate funds in 2009; these funds were still in the process of rolling in valuation changes of the prior year and reported an almost -30% return. By contrast, listed REITs, having already been repriced by the equity market in the prior year, posted a circa +30% return in 2009 as the listed market looked forward to a recovery. While history never repeats, it often rhymes. Nothing is ‘broken’ about listed REITs today, and private real estate doesn’t exist in its own separate world. We are certain the same assets can’t have such vastly different prices forever.
Figure 5: Forward-looking listed REITs fall and recover first
Source: CEM Benchmarking Report, Janus Henderson Investors analysis, as at 31 December 2019. Alexander D. Beath, Ph.D. & Chris Flynn, CFA. “Asset Allocation and Fund Performance of Defined Benefit Pension Funds in the United States, 1998-2019.” Past performance does not predict future returns.
1 Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Total Return Unhedged USD, S&P 500 Index, FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index. 31 December 2021 to 30 September 2022.
2 B-REIT (Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust), the largest private/non-traded REIT with $70bn in AUM, YTD return through 31 August 2022, https://www.breit.com/performance/, NCREIF ODCE Index via Bloomberg, YTD return through 30 June 2022. Both returns represent most recent available data.
3 Thomas R Arnold, David C Ling, Andy Naranjo. “Private Equity Real Estate Fund Performance: A Comparison to REITs and Open-End Core Funds.” The Journal of Portfolio Management Special Real Estate Issue 2021, October 2021.
4 Citi Research: Weekly REIT and Lodging Strategy, 12 August 2022.
5 Citi Research: Viewpoint, theHunter Express & Lodging Valuation Tool, 19 September 2022.
6 Thomas R Arnold, David C Ling, Andy Naranjo. “Private Equity Real Estate Fund Performance: A Comparison to REITs and Open-End Core Funds.” The Journal of Portfolio Management Special Real Estate Issue 2021, October 2021.
7 Based on August 2022 prospectuses for non-listed REITs: B-REIT (Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust) and S-REIT (Starwood Real Estate Income Trust).
8FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Index vs NCREIF ODCE Index as at 27 September 2022 and B-REIT most recent reported valuations.
Balance sheet: a financial statement that summarises a company’s assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity at a particular point in time. Used as an indicator of a company’s financial health.
Leverage: in the context of this article we refer to the amount of debt that a REIT carries. The leverage ratio is measured as the ratio of debt to total assets.
Discount to NAV occurs when the REIT’s market price is lower than the most recent NAV. A discount often indicates the market is generally bearish on the investments in the portfolio. Net Asset Value is the value of the portfolio’s assets at market close, minus liabilities, divided by the total number of shares outstanding. Conversely, premium to NAV occurs when the REIT’s market price is above NAV and is driven by the market’s bullish outlook on the investments in the portfolio, hence the willingness to pay a ‘premium’.
Monetary policy: policies of a central bank, aimed at influencing the level of inflation and growth in an economy. It includes controlling interest rates and the supply of money.
REITs or Real Estate Investment Trusts are an investment vehicle that invests in real estate, through direct ownership of property assets, property shares or mortgages. As they are listed on a stock exchange, REITs are usually highly liquid and trade like a normal share.
Real estate securities, including Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) may be subject to additional risks, including interest rate, management, tax, economic, environmental and concentration risks.
Foreign securities are subject to additional risks including currency fluctuations, political and economic uncertainty, increased volatility, lower liquidity, and differing financial and information reporting standards, all of which are magnified in emerging markets.
FTSE Nareit Equity REITs Index (FNRE) contains all equity REITs not designated as timber REITs or infrastructure REITs. The FTSE Nareit US Real Estate Index Series is designed to present investors with a comprehensive family of REIT performance indexes that spans the commercial real estate space across the US economy.
Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index (LBUSTRUU) is a broad-based measure of the investment grade, US dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market.
S&P500® Index (SPX) reflects US large-cap equity performance and represents broad US equity market performance.
The NCREIF Property Index (NPI) is the primary index used by institutional investors in the US to analyse the performance of commercial real estate and is used as a benchmark for actively-managed real estate portfolios.
FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index (FNER) tracks the performance of the US real estate investment trust (REIT) market.
These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. Any securities, funds, sectors and indices mentioned within this article do not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to buy or sell them.
Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.
The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.
Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.
- Shares/Units can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
- The Fund is focused towards particular industries or investment themes and may be heavily impacted by factors such as changes in government regulation, increased price competition, technological advancements and other adverse events.
- This Fund may have a particularly concentrated portfolio relative to its investment universe or other funds in its sector. An adverse event impacting even a small number of holdings could create significant volatility or losses for the Fund.
- The Fund invests in real estate investment trusts (REITs) and other companies or funds engaged in property investment, which involve risks above those associated with investing directly in property. In particular, REITs may be subject to less strict regulation than the Fund itself and may experience greater volatility than their underlying assets.
- The Fund may use derivatives with the aim of reducing risk or managing the portfolio more efficiently. However this introduces other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
- If the Fund holds assets in currencies other than the base currency of the Fund, or you invest in a share/unit class of a different currency to the Fund (unless hedged, i.e. mitigated by taking an offsetting position in a related security), the value of your investment may be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
- When the Fund, or a share/unit class, seeks to mitigate exchange rate movements of a currency relative to the base currency (hedge), the hedging strategy itself may positively or negatively impact the value of the Fund due to differences in short-term interest rates between the currencies.
- Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
- Some or all of the ongoing charges may be taken from capital, which may erode capital or reduce potential for capital growth.
- The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.
- In addition to income, this share class may distribute realised and unrealised capital gains and original capital invested. Fees, charges and expenses are also deducted from capital. Both factors may result in capital erosion and reduced potential for capital growth. Investors should also note that distributions of this nature may be treated (and taxable) as income depending on local tax legislation.