Portfolio managers Guy Barnard, Tim Gibson and Greg Kuhl, explain why they believe the REIT ‘reopening rotation’ trade has created an attractive opportunity to buy quality compounders offering sustainable growth, driven by long-term structural tailwinds.

  Key takeaways:

  • The growth prospects of many real estate companies exposed to powerful secular tailwinds have improved and look to continue to improve as a result of the pandemic.
  • However, in the aftermath of recent underperformance versus the wider REITs sector, ‘growth’ REITs have seen their valuation premiums disappear.
  • Performance differentials between ‘value’ and ‘growth’ real estate sectors has become stretched based on fundamentals, creating potential buying opportunities.

Since the announcement of the Pfizer vaccine’s efficacy against COVID-19 on 9 November, alongside the wider equity markets, we have seen a significant rotation to ‘value’ within the real estate investment trust (REIT) market. Specifically, while the overall US REIT sector has gained 14% since that day, ‘value’ REITs are up on average 52%, while ‘growth’ REITs have been declined by 7%.1 The rotation away from ‘growth’ real estate sectors that have directly benefited from COVID (industrial/logistics, cell towers, data centres, single-family rental housing, storage), towards ‘value’ sectors that have been negatively impacted by COVID (shopping centres, regional malls, hotels, office, coastal apartments) has been strong, and has happened in a very short space of time.

Identifying ‘quality compounders’

A recovery trade in the hardest hit real estate sectors was both expected and justified. Better‑than‑hoped vaccine announcements signalled the beginning of a return to normality and ongoing government stimulus cushioned the pandemic’s impact on the consumer. A focus on ‘cheap, but not broken’ names (stocks severely punished by the market but which could still offer a reasonable path to sustainable growth) has been beneficial, albeit some structurally impaired sectors, such as retail, have rallied the hardest. While the current trading momentum shows few signs of abating, we believe the performance differentials between value and growth real estate sectors have become stretched based on the underlying value of property assets; ie, fundamentals.

  As a result, we believe relative value has emerged in high quality REITs that continue to benefit from steady, long-term structural growth tailwinds. We refer to these companies as ‘quality compounders’.

Growth versus value — so much has changed in a year

REITs in ‘growth’ sectors offer highly visible long-term compounding return potential, driven by permanent and powerful secular tailwinds such as e-commerce, mobile data, cloud computing, 5G and changing demographics. The growth prospects of many real estate companies exposed to these trends have improved, and look to continue to improve as a result of the pandemic. However, in the aftermath of recent underperformance of the wider REITs sector, these companies have seen their previously high valuation premium disappear.

Figure 1: Historical price-to-NAV spread (growth versus value)

Price to NAV spread real estate Mar21

Source:  Evercore ISI Research, as at 1 March 2021. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Note: Net asset value (NAV) per share represents the estimated private market value of REIT-owned properties. ‘Growth’ includes Industrial, Single Family Rentals, Manufactured Housing, Storage, Life Science Office sectors. ‘Value’ includes Shopping Centres, Malls, Traditional Office, Healthcare, Coastal Apartments, Student Accommodation.  

In contrast, some companies that remain on the wrong end of structural change and are at risk of disintermediation (such as retail REITs) have seen their share prices recently soar above pre-COVID levels. Even given credit for a return to normality, a permanent impairment to income and valuations feels inevitable. Despite this, ‘growth’ REITs are now trading at a Price-to-NAV discount relative to ‘value’ REITs (see Figure 1), a phenomenon last seen in August 2018. This compares to a spread (differential) in the Price-to-NAV ratios between ‘value’ and ‘growth’, which stood at 25% in October last year, and has averaged 11% over the past three years to March 2021.2

Figure 2 shows two-year forward earnings growth expectations for growth versus value companies. Here we can see that the valuation moves of late are at odds with current market consensus expectations, with estimates for the ‘value’ sectors having come down sharply, while estimates for the ‘growth’ sectors have increased.

Figure 2: 2-year forward cumulative FFO per share growth

2 yr forward FFO Mar21

Source: Janus Henderson Investors, Evercore ISI Research company classifications. Data based on 2-year forward market consensus FFO per share estimates to 31 March 2021. Funds From Operations (FFO) is used by REITs to define the cash flow from their operations; ie, a measure of operating performance. The FFO per share ratio is typically used to evaluate a REIT in lieu of earnings per share (EPS) used to evaluate general equities.

Growth opportunities abound

We believe that the market is attaching a more positive outlook to certain property types, which rely more on hope and continued economic recovery momentum, rather than fundamentals. Equally, the market appears to be underestimating the long-term growth potential of best‑in‑class REITs that have the ability to grow, create significant shareholder value and potentially offer superior property returns in the coming years.

In summary, we believe this level of valuation divergence between ‘value’ and ‘growth’ has created a compelling opportunity; a rare chance to buy some of the highest quality publicly traded real estate companies, operating in sectors that look to be on the right side of change, at attractive valuations.

 

Footnotes:

1Growth’ and ‘value’ are based and adapted from current Evercore ISI Research characterisations. These can be thought of as ‘COVID outperformers’ and ‘COVID underperformers’ respectively.

Source: Bloomberg. MSCI US REIT Index, ‘value’ and ‘growth’ buckets,  total returns in US dollars from 9 November 2020 to 8 March 2021.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance.

2Source: Bloomberg, MSCI US REIT Index, data as at 1 March 2021. Net asset value (NAV) represents the estimated private market value of REIT-owned properties. Price-to-NAV shows how expensive a REIT is compared to its Net Asset Value. Price-to-NAV discount means a REIT trading price is lower than its net asset value (estimated private market value of REIT-owned properties).

Disintermediation: occurs when products and services are sold directly to consumers, rather than through stores, eg, e-commerce.