Jenna Barnard, Co-Head of Strategic Fixed Income, explores the options for meaningful policy easing by developed market central banks in the face of the current downturn in global activity.
- The global manufacturing downturn has recently entered its 14th consecutive month, but examining the downturn through the prism of the U.S. may leave investors with too sanguine a view.
- While policy options are mostly hamstrung in Japan, Europe has ample room to buy more corporate bonds. Meanwhile, the U.S. and Australia have the means for further conventional easing.
- In our view, the next big move in developed bond markets will ultimately see interest rates reconverge, with the U.S. moving down toward the rest.
The global manufacturing downturn has recently entered its 14th consecutive month of decline as measured by the Global Manufacturing PMI.¹ The downturn, which emanated in Asia, has had a severe knock-on effect on economies like Germany, which have created an economic model heavily interconnected with an emergent China in recent decades. In Australia, it has coincided with a housing and consumer downturn whose rhythm has been out of step with the slow consumer deleveraging in the rest of the developed world.
The result of such a prolonged period of weak global trade and export growth is that many central banks have moved on from the “denial” phase and are actively discussing and, in some cases, pursuing monetary easing (Australia and New Zealand).
An Unusual Cycle with the Fed Out of the Driver's Seat
Looking at this global growth downturn through the prism of the U.S. economy is fraught with danger, as investors are likely to come away with too sanguine a view. We have said in the past that the U.S. was not the source of this slowdown (unlike in 2000 and 2007) and it remains a relatively insular economy — U.S. exports form approximately 15% of its GDP versus 50% in Germany and 30% in the UK.
This is an unusual cycle where other central banks and the bond markets in the developed world are now conducting the mood music, which the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) is increasingly reactive to. This note explores the policy options in various countries to enact meaningful policy easing.
As we sit near or at the lower bound for interest rates, the ability to act is a new question for investors who previously focused on the willingness to act.
Central Banks that Have Not Done QE Yet
There is a relatively sparse list of central banks in the developed world that have not done quantitative easing (QE) yet, but that list includes both Australia and Canada. Notably, Australia has only cut rates since 2011. With interest rates currently sitting at a historic low of 1.25% and expected to fall to at least 1%, this bank only began discussing QE as a policy tool in December 2018. In a speech by Guy Debelle, Deputy Governor, he stated that “QE is a policy option in Australia, should it be required. There are less government bonds here, which may make QE more effective. But most of the traction in terms of borrowing rates in Australia is at the short end of the curve rather than the longer end of the curve, which might reduce the effectiveness of QE.”
In our view, it was no coincidence that the foreign currency pairing of AUDJPY (Australian dollar versus the Japanese yen) experienced a 7% flash crash in a few hours in early January 2019, following an 8% depreciation in the month prior to this move. This currency pairing perfectly encapsulates the central bank with the most scope (Australia) and the one with the least (Japan) for monetary policy easing.
Evolving Reaction Function at the Fed
The Fed signaled in early 2019 that rates had peaked but appears to be in an intellectual transition regarding the policy framework and the ability of the U.S. economy to remain immune from the global industrial downturn.
In this context, there is renewed focus on the structural undershooting of inflation since 2009. Notably, this is a very different spin from the comparisons to 1967 (inflation breakout risk) provided by Fed Chair Jerome Powell in the summer of 2018. Here, under the guidance of Vice Chair Richard Clarida, there is renewed focus on the international experience of low inflation and interest rates.
The recent signaling of a readiness to cut interest rates appears logical. The final 50 basis points² of hikes in October and December 2018 into pronounced weakness in rate-sensitive sectors, such as housing and autos, was clearly a mistake. Any deterioration in the employment market from here will likely engender an even stronger reaction. It is worth remembering that "surprising" in a rate-cutting cycle is admirable (unlike in a rate-hiking cycle).
ECB’s Draghi (and Board) Retiring Soon, Plus Hamstrung Policy Options in Japan
This is where it gets really interesting. First, because the starting point is not one that you would choose as a policymaker (negative interest rates plus government bond purchases close to their legal and technical limit), and second, because in Europe, European Central Bank (ECB) President Mario Draghi and significant members of the board are due to retire in 2019.
Starting with the ECB, Draghi has been clear that he believes the bank has room in all of its policy levers — including rate cuts into even more negative territory. It is worth noting that at a -0.4% deposit rate, the only relevant comparable is Switzerland with a -0.75% sight deposits rate; even Japan sits at -0.1% (key interest rate).
In our view, the most likely meaningful policy loosening is through investment-grade corporate bond purchases, which was first announced in March 2016. The ECB owns €178 billion (approximately 20%) of the eligible universe of corporate bonds. Its mandate allows purchases of up to 70% (ECB, May 31, 2019). An increase to 40% seems wholly credible and would imply another €200 billion of purchases of eligible investment-grade corporate bonds.
In the case of Japan, policy options really do look close to exhausted. With close to 50% of the Japanese government bond market owned by the central bank, explicit yield curve control (target for 10-year yields), negative interest rates and purchases of equity ETFs for years, it is difficult to find a policy option which could surprise to the upside.
The key constraining factor for the Bank of Japan was the market reaction in January 2016 when it cut interest rates into negative territory. The share price of banks plummeted and its currency moved higher as result of a risk-off reaction. This effectively tightened financial conditions and illustrated how hamstrung policy options were and still are.
Stopping Inflation Expectations from Sliding into the Abyss
In summary, the next big move for bond markets will likely see interest rates in the developed world reconverge. For many years, consensus has argued that this was likely to occur through rates in the rest of the developed world moving up toward U.S. interest rates. We have long disagreed and positioned for continuing divergence between the U.S. and rest of the world, viewing many economies as trapped in a lobster pot of low interest rates and quantitative easing.
The next big structural move in interest rates and government bond yields should be policy easing from those with ability to do so (i.e., the U.S. and Australia). For Europe, a move into private assets (corporate bonds) is likely as the limit of meaningful government bond QE is reached.
This may not be the “normalization” many hoped for, but it is a natural reaction for inflation-targeting central banks trying desperately to keep inflation expectations from sliding into a natural abyss, driven by long-term structural factors over which they have little control.
Developed World Bond Markets
Short-term rates signaling rate cuts?
Source: Bloomberg, Janus Henderson Investors, as of 6/18/19
1Source:Bloomberg, JP Morgan Global Manufacturing PMI, as of 7/1/19
2Basis point (bp) equals 1/100 of a percentage point. 1 bp = 0.01%, 100 bps = 1%.
Global Fixed Income Compass
More from Our Investment Professionals
Tug-of-War: Slowing Growth vs. Easing Monetary Policy
The U.S. Fixed Income team cautions that the tug-of-war between slowing growth and accommodation will likely be accompanied by periods of heightened uncertainty.
Globalization: Sorry, Donald, It’s Here to Stay
Global Head of Fixed Income Jim Cielinski discusses how attempts to push back on globalization could increase volatility and create a rocky path for investors.