Navigating Volatile Bond Markets

Securitized Products

Nick Maroutsos explains why the Fed will likely not meet its 2019 interest rate forecast and ways investors can position themselves for a more subdued rate path.

Key Takeaways

  • While data suggest that the U.S. economy remains solid, we believe that the Fed’s dovish bias should cause them to risk growth to run hot rather than prematurely squelch the expansion.
  • The absence of accelerating inflation should give the Fed sufficient room to pause as it reassesses growth prospects and brewing risks to the global economy.
  • The potential for fewer rate hikes along with growing macro and geopolitical concerns are likely to increase the attractiveness of shorter-dated U.S. Treasuries especially as market volatility has increased.

Until last summer, bond investors expected 2019 to be a continuation of gradual rate tightening by the Federal Reserve (Fed) and a shift upward along the front end of the U.S. Treasury yield curve. Fiscal stimulus and strong economic data stood to push the yield on 10-year Treasuries above 3.0% for the first time since 2014. This scenario was reinforced by wages registering annual gains greater than 3.0% and Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s comment that interest rates were “a long way from neutral,” meaning markets could expect additional hikes. Spurred by these developments, rates rose across the curve during the autumn. It was not to last.

The late-year reversal in Treasuries and widening of credit spreads indicate that the market’s expectations for 2019 have changed considerably. While many factors have contributed to falling yields and a flattening curve, we consider the focal point to be the Fed’s expected interest rate path.

Plan A – Out the Window?

Investors expected higher interest rates for several reasons. Foremost, the Fed told us. The rationale behind forward guidance was to telegraph the future path of rates so as not to surprise markets. Many believed the Fed sought to increase its “dry powder” to better prepare itself for an economic downturn. Economic data also favored continued tightening. U.S. GDP growth for 2018 is forecast to reach 3.0%, driven by solid consumption and business investment. The uptick in wages reminded the Fed to be vigilant about inflation. Lastly, the extended business cycle led to rich valuations in risk assets such as stocks and corporate credits and deteriorating credit standards, developments the Fed could interpret as signs of an overheating economy.

What Changed

With the labor market at what many view as full employment, the need to keep rates low has dissipated. However, given the lack of inflation, there is scant reason to push forward on aggressive tightening. In fact, we believe that disinflationary forces have recently gathered steam. After reaching the Fed’s targeted level, core inflation has slid back below 2.0%, and annualized monthly data indicate this downward trend is accelerating. Should crude oil’s 30% late-year drop prove sticky, lower prices could leech into core inflation, likely sending the Fed’s favored price gauge even lower.

Three-Month Change in Core PCE Price Index, Annualized

While the dip in year-over-year core inflation to 1.8% has raised eyebrows, what's more alarming is the even starker late-year disinflationary trend.

Three-Month Change in Core PCE Price Index | Janus Henderson Investors

Source: Bloomberg.

While lower oil prices benefit many industries, drilling’s increasing role in the U.S. economy could add a headwind to future growth prospects. But overshadowing the risk posed by oil are the trade disputes that have increased caution among companies as the future playing field of global commerce remains uncertain. This ambiguity has acutely weighed on China and the countries that are heavily intertwined in its supply chain.

Many of the autumn’s developments – from higher longer-dated Treasuries to a wobbly stock market – act as a form of fiscal tightening and, thus, may diminish the need for the Fed to maintain their recent pace. Furthermore, the Fed’s bias remains dovish, meaning that if they were to risk policy error, it would be to allow the economy to run hot for a finite period. It is our view that the risk posed by slowing rate hikes has diminished as the economy is arguably positioned for a sustained period of noninflationary growth.

Where to Go

For much of the past two years, we considered holding U.S. duration a risky proposition given the Fed’s removal of accommodative monetary policy vis-à-vis its developed market peers. In light of the widening range of outcomes for the global economy and the absence of inflation, we believe the 2019 prospects for Treasuries may not be as grim as originally expected. Should a slowdown in global growth occur or one of many potential sources of geopolitical risk ignite, Treasuries’ allure may further rise as investors seek traditional safe havens.

If investors choose to increase their Treasuries allocation, they still must be selective as to which tenors to target. The yield curve flattened significantly in 2018, with the spread between 10-year and 2-year notes sliding from 78 basis points (bps) in February to less than 12 bps by early December. Such a term structure provides investors little incremental return for the additional interest rate risk they take on when holding longer-dated securities. For this reason, we expect any push into Treasuries to be concentrated along the front end of the curve.

The Return of an Asset Class

As recently as 2017, the appeal of holding shorter-dated Treasuries may have been limited given their low yields. That is no longer the case. The Fed’s nine rate increases pushed the yield on the 2-year note toward 3.0% before the late 2018 reversal in yields, up from 0.55% in 2016. Higher yields have buttressed the argument for shorter-dated bonds being their own asset class rather than a proxy for cash they were viewed as for much of the post-crisis era. Should the pace of rate hikes be curtailed, we consider it more likely that the yield curve experiences some steepening in 2019 as investors seek the stability – and yield – of shorter-dated Treasuries.

The Alternatives

Conversely, a move into Treasuries would come at the expense of foreign bonds. We are, however, not there yet. Many regions lag the U.S. in tightening, and a slowdown in global growth will likely keep their policy accommodative for longer. Given their reliance on commodities and linkages to China, Australia and New Zealand fit into this category. These countries still offer attractive carry relative to the U.S., but increasing dovishness by the Fed may justify an eventual equal-weighting to U.S. duration.

European sovereigns, with their low yields, are less desirable. The situation is exacerbated by the acute risk the region faces with Brexit, Italy’s budget stand-off and a leadership transition in Germany. While we don’t expect the European Central Bank to institute another round of quantitative easing, we believe it will hold off on tightening until the outlook becomes clearer.

Risks Remain

Futures markets expect only one rate hike in 2019 and none in 2020, well below the Fed’s median forecast. Should the market be proven correct, investors would likely have to deal with a weaker-than-expected economy. Low-growth conditions would not be favorable for overburdened corporate balance sheets and the ensuing spread widening would add yet another reason for investors to seek the relatively safe harbor of Treasuries.

Should the Fed’s view be right, the market would likely experience a snapback much like what was experienced in October when yields rose across the curve. While not our base-case scenario, we believe the higher rate path could be driven by an upside surprise in inflation, either due to robust wage growth or tariffs resulting in higher-priced goods for U.S. consumers.

Global Fixed Income Compass

More from Our Investment Professionals

Risks and Opportunities in Agency MBS
A number of factors are set to influence agency MBS in 2019. Head of U.S. Securitized Products John Kerschner discusses the market’s dynamics and the risks and opportunities on the horizon.

Inflation – Is That It?
John Pattullo, Co-Head of Strategic Fixed Income, discusses the range of factors that he believes indicate that current inflation is more cyclical than structural.