Jenna Barnard and Nicholas Ware, Portfolio Managers on the Strategic Fixed Income Team, explain why they believe the second half of 2020 will see lower net issuance in corporate bond markets following the dizzying volume of new bond issues in the first half.
- The second half of 2020 will likely see lower net corporate bond issuance due to bond buybacks and repayments as companies, having raised sufficient liquidity in the first half, will be more aggressive in managing their ratings and leverage levels to ensure they qualify for central bank‑backed bailouts in the future.
- We believe companies will be working hard to protect their investment-grade ratings, and we may even see high-yield entities ahead of the next crisis trying to be upgraded to investment grade – similar to 2016, when the European Central Bank’s (ECB) corporate bond-buying facility was launched.
- The steps that companies have taken so far to shore up their credit may not fully offset the impact of weaker earnings due to the COVID-19 crisis, but it could set them up nicely for 2021. In addition, lower issuance for the remainder of 2020 could help support the asset class.
Following $1.2 trillion of corporate bond issuance since the start of 2020, which is up 95% versus 2019*, we are now making an argument for lower investment-grade net issuance in the second half of the year, helped by bond buybacks and repayments. We feel companies will be more aggressive in managing their ratings and leverage levels following the COVID‑19 pandemic to ensure they qualify for central bank‑backed bailouts.
Value in Being Investment Grade in the Next Downturn
The Federal Reserve (Fed) has set up two COVID crisis facilities: The Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility for new bond issues and the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility to provide liquidity for outstanding corporate bonds, both of which will be part of a toolbox for the next recession if needed.
To qualify for these facilities, corporates needed to be rated at least BBB-/Baa3 by at least two major ratings agencies as of March 22, 2020. Similarly, the European Central Bank (ECB) has been using its existing corporate sector purchase program (CSPP) and a newly created pandemic emergency purchase program, which requires the corporate to be rated investment grade by at least one agency to qualify.
So, if you are a chief financial officer of a company, you know that you are going to be much safer retaining an investment grade rating heading into the next downturn, where you will be able to access these tools.
We believe corporations will be working hard to protect their investment-grade ratings; we may even see companies with high-yield debt trying to be upgraded to investment grade in the next few years (also known as rising stars). We saw this in Europe in June 2016 when CSPP was launched, and many companies realized it was beneficial to carry an investment-grade rating. Exhibit 1 shows the changing pattern in ratings that followed the ECB’s bond purchases.
Exhibit 1: ECB Bond Purchases and Changes in Ratings
Larger companies are more likely to be diversified, have greater access to capital and have proven that they can adapt to crises. This is evident through the significant cuts that have been made to dividends, employees and capital expenditures in order to shore up credit positions. Hence, we are in a sweet spot in the credit cycle – and this is why we continue to remain constructive on corporate credit.
Investors Catching Up with the Change in Behavior
It looks like investors are now catching up with this change in behavior. Investment bank Bank of America recently conducted an investor survey and found that clients’ expectations to see fallen angels (investment-grade companies downgraded to sub-investment grade) over the next 12 months are now much lower than even a couple of months ago.
Exhibit 2: Percentage of BBB Rated Companies Expected to Be Downgraded to High Yield
Of course, there will be some fallen angels, but we believe that the story might be overhyped given the actions taken by many corporates and the support – both monetary and fiscal – from authorities. Between March and May of this year, companies raised sufficient funding, providing liquidity for their operations. We now expect them to try to reduce leverage on their balance sheets and buy back bonds in the second half of the year and into next year.
In addition, the Fed remains in the background, buying up bonds, too. While the Fed has had a huge impact on sentiment, it has not needed to buy many bonds in the new issue market, as shown in Exhibit 3. The data, from BNP Paribas, shows that strong bond buybacks by U.S. companies in June brought the total net issuance (dotted line) to a mere $6.5 billion for the month, although gross issuance was north of $100 billion – a real slowdown versus the period of March through May.
Exhibit 3: U.S. Investment-Grade Nonfinancial Issuance Patterns
There was also robust issuance in the European investment-grade market in the second quarter as companies focused on hoarding cash. Heading into the summer, we expect issuance to slow while a dominant ECB plays its part in buying corporate bonds at roughly €11 billion per month.
Exhibit 4: European Investment-Grade Nonfinancial Issuance Patterns
The fact that corporations have taken several steps, such as front-loading issuance, cutting investments and shareholder payouts, may not fully offset the impact from weaker earnings going forward (due to the twin shocks of COVID‑19 and the oil crisis), but it could set them up nicely for 2021. We believe lower issuance for the remainder of 2020 will be an important story leading to credit remaining a well‑supported asset class.
*As of 6/19/20
Subscribe for relevant insights delivered straight to your inbox