For financial professionals in Uruguay

China’s three Cs: COVID, consumption and credit


Oct 28, 2021

Jennifer James, emerging market credit portfolio manager, considers how policies enacted by China’s government towards COVID, consumption and credit are likely to shape China’s near-term trajectory.


  Key takeaways

  • China’s current COVID policy is contributing to supply chain issues.
  • Consumption growth in China is proving weaker than expected, potentially reflecting COVID’s economic impact on low earners and the shift in political attitudes towards reining in debt expansion.
  • The crackdown on debt levels in China’s economy is likely to have domestic and global repercussions given the strong relationship between debt expansion and economic growth within China.

 

The policies enacted by the government to address these three broad categories – COVID, consumption and credit – help explain China’s current situation and will likely shape its near-term trajectory. Longer-term, China is seeking to evolve its economy through innovation; to thread the needle between profits and protecting the welfare of its people. The sheer scope and challenge involved in evolving such a large economy is formidable; no other country has the ability nor the ambition to undertake what China is doing. However, these efforts can lead to unintended consequences. Indeed, the simultaneous policy shocks across different sectors that we have seen thus far have likely caused an acceleration of an otherwise natural economic slowdown, eroding consumer sentiment, and contributing to recent market instability.

COVID

China has pursued a zero-tolerance strategy towards COVID-19. Entire metropolitan areas have been locked down following the detection of cases. It has been indicated that an 80-85%1 vaccination target would need to be fulfilled before there are any changes to this strategy. Manufacturing activity has not been shielded from this approach, with severe restrictions imposed on the industrial hub of Guangdong. Such an approach, which can instantly choke economic activity, only to turn the economy back on like a light switch when cases subside, is disruptive. This is because activity is often easier to cease than to restart. Soaring global freight rates are indicative of the congestion caused by China’s COVID intolerance, which included the closure of Ningbo-Zhoushan, the world’s third busiest port, reportedly over one positive case.

Figure 1: China's vaccination rate exceeds that of the UK and US but is short of its 80-85% condition for reopening

China's vaccination rate exceeds that of the UK and US but is short of its 80-85% condition for reopening

Source: Bloomberg, NCOVCNPV Index (China), NCOVGBPV Index (UK), NCOVUSPV Index (US), NCOVFRPV Index (France), 8 August 2021 to 27 October 2021

Figure 2: Rising container freight rates

Rising container freight rates

Source: Bloomberg, WCI (World Container Index) Composite Container Freight Benchmark Rate (WCIDCOMP), 21 October 2020 to 21 October 2021

Consumption

Chinese retail consumption remains weak. It has fallen far short of expectations that it would improve as restrictions eased. Evidence of a rebound has been negligible, with China’s post-COVID retail sales growth remaining well below the 8%2 pre-pandemic growth rate, recorded in December 2019.

Anaemic consumption may reflect the greatest burden of the COVID economic fallout being shouldered by those most susceptible to it. Low earners represent 40%2 of the population and labour market data suggests their income has not increased in line with more lucrative professions such as technology and financial services.

Figure 3: Income inequality worsened as low-income groups bore the brunt from COVID

Income inequality worsened as low-income groups bore the brunt from COVID

Source: Barclays Research, Special Topic: China, Policy Evolution, September 2021

Similarly, household saving rates rose in response to COVID lockdowns but have not been used by savers to fuel a consumption-based recovery as the economy reopened. This may reflect the disruption and uncertainty resulting from the zero-COVID approach, where sudden restrictions being imposed make it difficult to plan for leisure spending. Additionally, it could indicate that consumers are cautious about their future employment prospects.

Figure 4: Fast rise in household deposits

Fast rise in household deposits

Source: Barclays Research, Special Topic: China, Policy Evolution, September 2021

Credit

Another factor potentially weighing on consumers’ appetite to spend is the government’s crackdown on property. The government has stated that they do not wish housing to be a speculative market. Property is of societal significance in China, representing 23.3% of GDP3. Policies implemented to stabilise the housing market are beginning to bear fruit, albeit they appear to have overshot and are dampening this engine of growth.

Figure 5: Year-on-year growth in new home sales and its breakdown by city tier

Year-on-year growth in new home sales and its breakdown by city tier

Source: Nomura Global Research, China: Property-related indicators broadly worsened in September, October 2021. A city’s tier is calculated from an average of its political standing, population and GDP. Tier 1 reflects the biggest cities.

We have already seen some of the risk from a slowdown in the property sector, combined with stricter government policy on debt levels, manifest itself in the troubles at Evergrande, the huge Chinese property developer. Systemic risk from the Evergrande saga is likely to be low given that banks have limited direct exposure to property-related loans and China is likely to contain any fallout from being excessive. Nevertheless, support is more likely to be aimed at homebuyers than company bailouts per se, so equity and credit markets may have to absorb some losses. We can see the reaction in credit markets, with China’s credit spreads gaping wider. So far, there has been limited contagion beyond China, with broader emerging market high yield and investment grade spreads barely changed.

Figure 6: Muted response by credit markets outside China

Muted response by credit markets outside China

Source: Bloomberg, JPMorgan CEMBI = JPMorgan Corporate Emerging Market Bond Index, JBCDCBZW Index (Broad Diversified); JBCDIGZW Index (High Grade or Investment Grade); JBCDHYZW Index (High Yield); JBCDCNZW Index (China). 1 October 2020 to 21 October 2021

Attempts to tackle high debt levels in property form part of an overall drive to rein in credit growth. Major policy actions have been enacted to support the leadership’s credit tightening agenda, including2.

  • The People’s Bank of China (PBoC) tightening property credit (encompassing trust and bond financing for developers and mortgages for consumers).
  • The Ministry of Finance (MoF) imposing stricter curbs on both local government financing vehicles (LGFV) and bond issuance. The State Council also condoned the default of LGFVs.
  • The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) tightening trust and shadow financing, with a 2021 reduction target of CNY1 trillion.

China has enjoyed decades of impressive debt-fuelled growth. Rising debt as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) has had a positive relationship with Chinese GDP per capita. The risk to the wider world is that China’s desire to deleverage leads to slower domestic growth, with knock-on effects to global growth.

Figure 7: China's debt-fuelled growth

China's debt-fuelled growth

Source: Bloomberg, CHBGDTOP Index (R1), GDCCPCHN Index (L1),31 December 2004 to 31 December 2020

1Source: Deutsche Bank, Exit Strategy Policy Tracker, October 2021
2Source: Barclays Research, Special Topic: China, Policy Evolution, September 2021
3Source: Goldman Sachs Economics Research, China Data Insights: How big is China’s property sector, October 2021

Deleveraging: A company reducing its borrowing/debt as a proportion of its balance sheet. Within an investment fund, it refers to the fund reducing its level of leverage.
GDP: Gross domestic product – a measure of the size of the economy.
Systemic risk: The risk of a critical or harmful change in the financial system as a whole, which would affect all markets and asset classes.
High yield: A bond that has a lower credit rating than an investment grade bond. Sometimes known as a sub-investment grade bond. These bonds carry a higher risk of the issuer defaulting on their payments, so they are typically issued with a higher coupon (interest payment) to compensate for the additional risk.
Investment grade: A bond typically issued by governments or companies perceived to have a relatively low risk of defaulting on their payments, so are given a higher credit rating by credit rating agencies.
Spread: the difference in yield between a bond (or a group of bonds in an index) and the risk-free rate, the US short term Treasury bond. It is typically expressed in basis points (100 basis points = 1%)
Z-spread: Zero-volatility spread is the spread that must be added to each spot interest rate on the US Treasury yield curve to cause the present value of the bond’s cash flows to equal the bond’s price.
Yield curve: A graph that plots the yields of similar quality bonds against their maturities. In a normal/upward sloping yield curve, longer maturity bond yields are higher than short-term bond yields.

These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. Any securities, funds, sectors and indices mentioned within this article do not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to buy or sell them.

 

Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.

 

The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.

 

Marketing Communication.

 

Glossary

 

 

 

Important information

Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.

The Janus Henderson Horizon Fund (the “Fund”) is a Luxembourg SICAV incorporated on 30 May 1985, managed by Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. may decide to terminate the marketing arrangements of this Collective Investment Scheme in accordance with the appropriate regulation. This is a marketing communication. Please refer to the prospectus of the UCITS and to the KIID before making any final investment decisions.
    Specific risks
  • An issuer of a bond (or money market instrument) may become unable or unwilling to pay interest or repay capital to the Fund. If this happens or the market perceives this may happen, the value of the bond will fall. High yielding (non-investment grade) bonds are more speculative and more sensitive to adverse changes in market conditions.
  • When interest rates rise (or fall), the prices of different securities will be affected differently. In particular, bond values generally fall when interest rates rise. This risk is generally greater the longer the maturity of a bond investment.
  • Emerging markets expose the Fund to higher volatility and greater risk of loss than developed markets; they are susceptible to adverse political and economic events, and may be less well regulated with less robust custody and settlement procedures.
  • The Fund may invest in onshore bonds via Bond Connect. This may introduce additional risks including operational, regulatory, liquidity and settlement risks.
  • The Fund may use derivatives towards the aim of achieving its investment objective. This can result in 'leverage', which can magnify an investment outcome and gains or losses to the Fund may be greater than the cost of the derivative. Derivatives also introduce other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
  • If the Fund holds assets in currencies other than the base currency of the Fund or you invest in a share/unit class of a different currency to the Fund (unless 'hedged'), the value of your investment may be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
  • When the Fund, or a hedged share/unit class, seeks to mitigate exchange rate movements of a currency relative to the base currency, the hedging strategy itself may create a positive or negative impact to the value of the Fund due to differences in short-term interest rates between the currencies.
  • Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
  • The Fund may incur a higher level of transaction costs as a result of investing in less actively traded or less developed markets compared to a fund that invests in more active/developed markets. These transaction costs are in addition to the Fund's Ongoing Charges.
  • Some or all of the ongoing charges may be taken from capital, which may erode capital or reduce potential for capital growth.
  • The Fund may invest in contingent convertible bonds (CoCos), which can fall sharply in value if the financial strength of an issuer weakens and a predetermined trigger event causes the bonds to be converted into shares of the issuer or to be partly or wholly written off.
  • The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.