Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility European espresso: A new paradigm for European defence stocks - Janus Henderson Investors
For financial professionals in Uruguay

European espresso: A new paradigm for European defence stocks

As part of our Espresso series, providing an expert blend of views on European equities, Portfolio Manager Marc Schartz argues the case for a multi-decade shift in sentiment towards the European defence industry.

Marc Schartz, CFA

Marc Schartz, CFA

Portfolio Manager


Mar 13, 2024
7 minute watch

Key takeaways:

  • A sustained rise in geopolitical tensions has transformed the investment landscape for European defence stocks.
  • With the majority of NATO countries now committed to honouring their 2% of GDP target for defence spending, it is difficult to envisage a scenario in which the defence industry does not benefit.
  • Valuations in the European defence sector are not out of line with the overall industrial sector and there is room for greater consolidation in the market.

It has been a particularly interesting few months in the European defence industry, so we thought it was interesting to look a bit into what is happening there. First of all, we think that there is a fundamental paradigm shift going on in European defence. After the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, defence spending in Europe was really tumbling down the priority list for politicians, but also the electorate. On top of that, investors put the defence industry into the penalty box, because it was deemed non-compliant with ESG requirements.

Now I would say roughly two years ago, all of this started to be put on its head. We had heightened geopolitical tensions; we have now unfortunately have a war in Europe; we have a possible return of Trump to the White House, and question marks around the long-term viability of the NATO construct. So it was clear that Europe had to change its approach to defence. And we have seen a reaction. One stat says, for example, in 2024, 18 of the 31 NATO countries will actually honour their 2% spend as a percentage of GDP. In 2016, there was five countries only honouring that.

So, has the problem been fixed? Has it been addressed? Well, I think we are actually only at the foothills of a multi-decade long investment cycle into defence. Thirty years of chronic underinvestment cannot be fixed overnight. Various bodies look at the situation and they say that the underinvestment in Europe has been accumulating to something like US$600 billion. So even spending 2% of GDP might not be enough to catch up in a timely manner.

So we cannot forecast the geopolitical twists and turns; but it is very difficult to come up with a picture [where investment] will not continue to go up in the coming years. Looking at it [through] a more conventional investment lens, defence stocks have rallied in the last two years, because of this input outlook. However, valuations remain reasonable. The sector more or less trades in line with the overall industrial sector – that is quite interesting given the very positive close outlook I just mentioned. On top of that, the sector remains fragmented, so consolidation provides some upside optionality.

A third point would be that defence is one of very few sub-sectors where the outlook in Europe for earnings is probably better than in the US, and that makes it very interesting from a European equity perspective.

And then the last point I would make is that investor acceptance is growing; and I will just borrow here a phrase by the CEO of Euronext, a pan-European exchange. He said last week: “There is a new brand of ESG making the rounds, and that is for energy, security and geopolitics”. So, plenty of investors still to come into this space.

References made to individual securities do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, investment strategy or market sector, and should not be assumed to be profitable. Janus Henderson Investors, its affiliated advisor, or its employees, may have a position in the securities mentioned.

 

These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. References made to individual securities do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, investment strategy or market sector, and should not be assumed to be profitable. Janus Henderson Investors, its affiliated advisor, or its employees, may have a position in the securities mentioned.

 

Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.

 

The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.

 

Marketing Communication.

 

Glossary

 

 

 

Important information

Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.

The Janus Henderson Horizon Fund (the “Fund”) is a Luxembourg SICAV incorporated on 30 May 1985, managed by Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. may decide to terminate the marketing arrangements of this Collective Investment Scheme in accordance with the appropriate regulation. This is a marketing communication. Please refer to the prospectus of the UCITS and to the KIID before making any final investment decisions.
    Specific risks
  • Shares/Units can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
  • Shares of small and mid-size companies can be more volatile than shares of larger companies, and at times it may be difficult to value or to sell shares at desired times and prices, increasing the risk of losses.
  • If a Fund has a high exposure to a particular country or geographical region it carries a higher level of risk than a Fund which is more broadly diversified.
  • The Fund may use derivatives with the aim of reducing risk or managing the portfolio more efficiently. However this introduces other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
  • If the Fund holds assets in currencies other than the base currency of the Fund, or you invest in a share/unit class of a different currency to the Fund (unless hedged, i.e. mitigated by taking an offsetting position in a related security), the value of your investment may be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
  • When the Fund, or a share/unit class, seeks to mitigate exchange rate movements of a currency relative to the base currency (hedge), the hedging strategy itself may positively or negatively impact the value of the Fund due to differences in short-term interest rates between the currencies.
  • Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
  • The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.
Marc Schartz, CFA

Marc Schartz, CFA

Portfolio Manager


Mar 13, 2024
7 minute watch

Key takeaways:

  • A sustained rise in geopolitical tensions has transformed the investment landscape for European defence stocks.
  • With the majority of NATO countries now committed to honouring their 2% of GDP target for defence spending, it is difficult to envisage a scenario in which the defence industry does not benefit.
  • Valuations in the European defence sector are not out of line with the overall industrial sector and there is room for greater consolidation in the market.