For financial professionals in Uruguay

Global technology markets seek normalcy in 2022

Denny Fish

Denny Fish

Portfolio Manager | Research Analyst


Jan 4, 2022

After enduring a string of extraordinary developments over the past few years, 2022 may be a year of normalisation as economic growth broadens and powerful secular themes remain intact.

Key Takeaways

  • Several tech segments – among them semiconductor equipment makers – are potentially positioned to benefit from supply chain shortages resulting from economic reopening, sovereign deployments of fabrication facilities and the longer-term trend of a digitising economy.
  • Technology’s ability to disrupt existing business models remains on display – with fintech being a recent example – and reminds us that the marketplace is ever dynamic.
  • Higher interest rates and their effect on global growth present a challenge to cyclical tech stocks as well as longer-duration growth stocks through potential downward pressure on valuations.

What themes do you anticipate will most influence the global tech sector in 2022?

2022 is shaping up to be a year of normalisation for the technology sector. In the past 20 months, tech has experienced an acceleration of the digitisation of the global economy, historic supply-chain disruptions and a backdrop of highly accommodative monetary policy. These developments have the potential to shift over the next few quarters. Given the sway it has over other sectors, the semiconductor shortage may merit the most attention. Progress is being made in reducing backlogs, but it may take until the latter half of the year before chip makers can fulfill outstanding orders. Equilibrium, however, is a moving target given strong secular and cyclical demand for semis. We see sustained tailwinds for the advanced chips powering novel technologies like artificial intelligence and for the memory chips and microcontrollers that have become ubiquitous across industries.

There are concerns that the segments that fared best during the pandemic, including software, digital ads and social platforms, may have a hard time exceeding recent comparables. We believe these business models remain advantaged and that a more telling comparison is a two-year growth comparison against 2019 results. Mega-cap names aligned with attractive secular themes remain at valuations in line with the broader market, despite what we view as these companies’ potential for higher growth rates.

Where do you expect to see the most compelling opportunities?

We believe the tech sector is positioned to benefit from both secular and cyclical forces. We see these converging in the semiconductor complex. To ameliorate current shortages and meet rising demand as supply chains become localised, manufacturing capacity must be added. Integral to this are the capital equipment makers that enable chip fabrication. Furthermore, as these companies’ customer bases grow, so should service-based, recurring revenue. We also view connected TVs as increasingly fertile ground for customisable digital ads. Lastly, we are only scratching the surface of disruptive fintech and believe that many segments of finance stand to reap the efficiencies inherent in innovative technologies and business models.

What are some of the most underappreciated risks?

Near-term risks to tech stocks fall into two categories: macro and sector specific. With respect to the former, the likelihood of rising interest rates introduces the risk of policy error. Should central banks move too quickly, they could squelch economic expansion. This would be most harmful to “cyclical growth” stocks, namely semiconductors. Secular growers would also be at risk as the value of their distant future revenue streams would be diminished by higher discount rates. We think an underappreciated risk unique to the sector is “disruptors getting disrupted.” The past few years have seen an unprecedented number of businesses and industries upended by innovative companies. Given the rapid pace of change, there is no rule that yesterday’s disruptors won’t fall victim to the next wave of technological advancement and scrappy upstarts. Regulatory risk also continues to lurk. While China clamped down on the tech sector in one fell swoop, Western governments may ultimately achieve the same ends, but in a more incremental manner.

Provide what you believe to be the most important takeaway for an investor with exposure to (or considering) tech stocks in 2022.

It may seem like tech commands a disproportionate share of corporate headlines. This is no accident. Given the potential for delivering increased efficiencies across the economy, it’s our view that tech companies will command an ever-greater share of aggregate corporate earnings and, thus, equity returns as the digitisation of the global economy continues. The pace of disruption inherent in the sector, however, can lead to elevated volatility. To address these, we believe investors should place a high value on active management and a balanced approach. Active management, in our view, enables investors to maximise exposure to the technologies and businesses that we expect to drive earnings over the longer horizon, while underweighting certain legacy names facing disruption and diminishing market share.

The current period is illustrative of the importance of balance. Right now, tech stands to benefit from both cyclical- and secular-growth tailwinds. That is not always the case and managers should be mindful of the forces set to redefine the sector over the longer term and the current environment, which may either be favourable for tech companies or present temporary headwinds. Similarly, investors should recognise the distinct characteristics of names that exhibit resilience and those with optionality. Resilient companies tend to be more mature and have the consistent earnings streams that allow them to weather a range of environments. More optional names have the potential to deliver above-average earnings growth as they establish new markets and capture a greater share of existing ones.

 

Monetary policy refers to the policies of a central bank, aimed at influencing the level of inflation and growth in an economy. It includes controlling interest rates and the supply of money. Monetary stimulus refers to a central bank increasing the supply of money and lowering borrowing costs. Monetary tightening refers to central bank activity aimed at curbing inflation and slowing down growth in the economy by raising interest rates and reducing the supply of money.

MARKET GPS

Portfolio Manager Outlooks

What should be on the radar for investors in 2022?

MarketGPS_Overarching_DARKslate

These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. Any securities, funds, sectors and indices mentioned within this article do not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to buy or sell them.

 

Past performance does not predict future returns. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.

 

The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.

 

Marketing Communication.

 

Glossary

 

 

 

Important information

Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.

Janus Henderson Capital Funds Plc is a UCITS established under Irish law, with segregated liability between funds. Investors are warned that they should only make their investments based on the most recent Prospectus which contains information about fees, expenses and risks, which is available from all distributors and paying/facilities agents, it should be read carefully. This is a marketing communication. Please refer to the prospectus of the UCITS and to the KIID before making any final investment decisions. The rate of return may vary and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate due to market and foreign exchange movements. Shares, if redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. This is not a solicitation for the sale of shares and nothing herein is intended to amount to investment advice. Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. may decide to terminate the marketing arrangements of this Collective Investment Scheme in accordance with the appropriate regulation.
    Specific risks
  • Shares/Units can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
  • Shares of small and mid-size companies can be more volatile than shares of larger companies, and at times it may be difficult to value or to sell shares at desired times and prices, increasing the risk of losses.
  • If a Fund has a high exposure to a particular country or geographical region it carries a higher level of risk than a Fund which is more broadly diversified.
  • The Fund is focused towards particular industries or investment themes and may be heavily impacted by factors such as changes in government regulation, increased price competition, technological advancements and other adverse events.
  • This Fund may have a particularly concentrated portfolio relative to its investment universe or other funds in its sector. An adverse event impacting even a small number of holdings could create significant volatility or losses for the Fund.
  • The Fund may use derivatives towards the aim of achieving its investment objective. This can result in 'leverage', which can magnify an investment outcome and gains or losses to the Fund may be greater than the cost of the derivative. Derivatives also introduce other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
  • If the Fund holds assets in currencies other than the base currency of the Fund or you invest in a share/unit class of a different currency to the Fund (unless 'hedged'), the value of your investment may be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
  • When the Fund, or a hedged share/unit class, seeks to mitigate exchange rate movements of a currency relative to the base currency, the hedging strategy itself may create a positive or negative impact to the value of the Fund due to differences in short-term interest rates between the currencies.
  • Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
  • The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.