The second quarter began in dramatic fashion with “Liberation Day” tariffs announced on April 2. Broad U.S. equity indices plunged by 10% or more over the next several days, as investors began to assess the negative impacts that tariffs might have on global economic growth and corporate profitability.

Markets shook off these fears relatively quickly, however, as corporations reported generally strong quarterly earnings growth and provided better-than-feared guidance. Easing trade tensions also increased investor appetite for risk. We get the sense that fears over trade policy may already have peaked, an assessment that has boosted the performance of risk assets. We have also been encouraged by positive signs of growth outside of the U.S., especially in Europe, which may present opportunities for companies with international exposure.

Technology: Prioritizing AI and digital innovation/monetization

Denny Fish and Jonathan Cofsky

What happened: The tech sector began the quarter with significant volatility, spurred by trade frictions and questions over the pace of industry spending on artificial intelligence (AI). By June, these concerns largely dissipated as tech giants such as Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, and Google confirmed that demand for AI capabilities showed no signs of abating. As a result, technology stocks, which saw losses in Q1, reversed course and delivered strong gains for the second quarter.

Looking ahead. Despite tariff-related uncertainty, we believe resilient U.S. growth and stabilizing economic trends in other regions bode well for cyclically oriented tech companies. We continue to see tremendous opportunity around secular growth trends such as AI. To that end, we expect more companies to begin integrating AI solutions into front- and back-office operations, creating an attractive flywheel if these applications improve revenue growth, increase efficiencies, and expand profit margins for customers.

To capitalize on these trends, we are focusing on leading hardware and semiconductor producers. We also see opportunity for software companies able to leverage access to client workflows and data to train and optimize AI models. Finally, we think companies developing more advanced AI platforms that handle complex tasks could be particularly well positioned, as these capabilities could lead to enhanced pricing power and durable competitive advantages.

Communication Services: AI and digital disruption open new opportunities

Josh Cummings

What happened: Communication services stocks outperformed the broader market in the second quarter, with many companies within the sector rebounding strongly from a Q1 sell-off. That includes streaming and music providers with subscription-based business models and firms on the leading edge of AI services and tools. By contrast, the sector’s traditionally more defensive companies, such as wireless and Internet providers, lagged the broader market advance, while investors weighed the potential disruption that could be caused by AI to existing revenue streams, such as Internet search.

Looking ahead: We are monitoring economic and policy developments that could impact cyclical market segments, such as the advertising ecosystem. We remain excited about long-term opportunities around secular trends such as AI, which we believe has the potential to be more pervasive and powerful than the broader market now expects. We also anticipate continued consolidation around the largest, digitally native platforms best equipped to attract both content and users.

Healthcare: Innovation rises above policy uncertainty

Andy Acker

What happened: Healthcare stocks declined and lagged the broader market during the second quarter, pressured by policy uncertainty such as potential drug pricing reform and pharmaceutical tariffs. The appointment of Vinay Prasad to head the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research was another source of uncertainty (Prasad is a well-known critic of the pharma industry). Healthcare services were dragged down by negative news from industry leader UnitedHealth Group following a surprise earnings miss and guidance cut. On a more positive note, the quarter saw some improvement in merger and acquisition activity. Among deals announced, Sanofi said it would acquire Blueprint Medicines for more than $9 billion, and Eli Lilly agreed to buy gene-editing firm Verve Therapeutics for up to $1.3 billion.

Looking ahead:  If there’s one upside to the drumbeat of negative news, it’s that the healthcare sector now trades at a price-to-earnings ratio relative to the S&P 500^® Index that is nearly two standard deviations lower than the long-term average. The FDA has also approved 26 drugs for the year through early July, ahead of the total this time last year. To us, that suggests innovation within the sector remains alive and well and may be had at a discount. As such, we remain focused on the small- and mid-cap biopharma companies driving medical advances but favor early commercial-stage companies with breakthrough products and late-stage development companies that we think are clinically derisked, given policy uncertainty. Medical device companies with new product cycles have also escaped political attention so far, while non-U.S. pharma with globally diversified revenue streams could be well positioned. Finally, we remain positive on leading health insurers and drug distributors. These companies are integral to the administration of healthcare in the U.S. and could be more insulated from recent tariff and drug pricing proposals.

Industrials: On the lookout for stable growth and self-help stories

David Chung

What happened: Industrials stocks extended their strong year-to-date performance in the second quarter, outperforming the broader market. Tariff impacts were more muted than feared, due in part to the pause in levies and company cost and price management. Many firms also built up inventories in anticipation of tariffs, which may have pulled some demand forward. Companies ended the quarter with greater clarity around government tax policies, spending plans, and efforts to prioritize domestic production.

Looking ahead: We are closely following developments around tariffs, geopolitical stability, and consumer and business confidence as we look for signs of any resurgence in the broader industrial sector and in end markets such as freight. We continue to prioritize companies with exposure to strong secular themes, such as commercial aerospace and electrification. While stock multiples for such companies have seen some expansion, we remain excited about strong revenue growth potential that may flow through to higher margins and profits. Given lingering economic uncertainty, we also favor companies making operational improvements or that are exposed to unique catalysts that may drive stable profit growth even in uncertain times.

Financials: A strong setup thanks to positive cyclical and secular trends

John Jordan

What happened: Financials stocks rose along with broader equities, supported by relatively stable employment and consumer spending growth. Worries over tariffs and geopolitics eased, leading to improved investor sentiment. Key economic variables, such as unemployment and consumer spending growth, were relatively stable.

Looking ahead: We believe the global financial services sector offers a rich landscape in which to deploy deep fundamental research. Favorable cyclical trends, including relatively low levels of credit losses and delinquencies, exist across many areas of the global financials market. Pricing for property and casualty insurance appears attractive, in our view, and interest rates remain well above zero in most major markets. We are excited about secular trends, such as growth in electronic payments, and the advantages for companies leveraging proprietary data and advanced technological capabilities. We also continue to like the outlook for European banks, many of which, in our view, are positioned to benefit from significant capital return, an improved regulatory backdrop, and potential industry consolidation.

Consumer: Emphasizing company fundamentals amid potential macro headwinds

Josh Cummings

What happened: Consumer stocks rose in line with the broader market, as investors shook off their first-quarter caution and worst-case fears around tariffs. Consumer confidence improved, and we saw a relatively healthy pace of retail sales growth and personal consumption expenditures.

Looking ahead: While we have welcomed the resilience in consumer spending, we have seen some clouds on the horizon. These include slowing employment growth and the potential strain of tariff-related price increases. Given these risks, we continue to pay close attention to the quality and resilience of business models. That includes a mix of cyclical and defensive businesses, consistent with our philosophy of avoiding implied macroeconomic bets, as well as companies on the right side of digital disruption, a long-term theme that has shown no sign of abating. Market volatility can also create opportunities to deploy bottom-up stock and take advantage of attractive valuations.

Energy & Utilities: A defensive approach to market crosscurrents

Noah Barrett

What happened: Energy stocks materially underperformed the broader market in the second quarter, as tariff concerns increased global economic uncertainty. The weakness in energy stocks was broad-based, with the largest declines in shares of oil services companies and upstream producers with higher debt levels. The price of oil was volatile but averaged $67 per barrel for Brent crude, a level we believe supports solid returns for most energy companies.

Looking ahead:  We remain defensive given our view that oil prices may continue to be volatile, if not range-bound. Despite the potential for short-term price spikes on geopolitical concerns, we see greater risk of a downward move in oil prices as a result of weaker global demand. OPEC+ countries have also announced further production increases, which could add to supply. And while at current prices we do not expect substantial increases in U.S. production, the Trump administration remains focused on lowering oil prices, either by incentivizing incremental supply or through policies to reduce demand. Longer term, we also recognize that China’s drive toward electrification and oil independence could put downward pressure on demand and pricing in the global energy market. Given market uncertainties, we think integrated oil, midstream, and large, diversified exploration and production companies could offer the most attractive balance of reward/risk