China’s industrial rebound

03/10/2017

Download

​In this Q&A, China portfolio managers Charlie Awdry and May Ling Wee, discuss China’s unexpectedly strong economic growth this year, which has been driven by a robust pick up in industrials. They explain why sector reform and rising producer prices could turn this into a more sustainable trend.

At the start of 2017, many investors worried about a sharp slowdown in China. There were expectations that the country’s property market would soften and that the government would tighten monetary policy and rein in speculative investments and illegal activities. So far, however, economic growth this year has been surprisingly resilient. During the second quarter, China’s gross domestic product (GDP) rose by an annual rate of 6.9%, well ahead of most forecasts and above Beijing’s target of around 6.5% for the year. Even more interestingly, much of that growth could be attributed to a rise in industrial output – or China’s old economy.

Q: What is driving China’s surprisingly strong economic growth this year?

A: We believe that China’s economic growth has been stronger lately because the cyclical improvement in Chinese corporate profits has exceeded analyst expectations, both in the size of the upswing and in how many different sectors of the economy have benefited. This upswing is due partly to the return of rising prices, in particular industrial prices as measured by producer price indices (PPI), helping commodity-driven sectors. Improving consumer confidence and expenditures, as well as product innovation and the rise of social media advertising in the internet sector, have also aided economic growth.

Q: Why has China’s old economy, which includes the industrials and materials sectors, delivered strong profits recently?

A: Although the old economy is expected to slow down, the companies that make up this segment – steel producers and packaging and paper manufacturers, for example – generally delivered positive earnings during the corporate reporting season. State-mandated capacity cuts and environmental regulations have led to the shutdown of inefficient operations, improving the pricing and profit margin environment for many industries. We also believe analysts have underestimated the positive operating leverage that is coming through corporate income statements as a result of improving top line growth.

Q: How sustainable is the rebound in industrials and other areas of China’s old economy?

A: Returns on capital employed and returns on equity in many of these old economy industries may have bottomed. In fact, these metrics appear to be improving, as companies have scaled back expansion plans and capital expenditure just as the economic cycle and cash flows improve. Currently, this is translating into higher dividends for shareholders. We think any sustainable improvement in return on assets in the current economic cycle would be a very bullish sign for China, so we continue to watch this closely.

 

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.

The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.

For promotional purposes.

Anything non-factual in nature is an opinion of the author(s), and opinions are meant as an illustration of broader themes, are not an indication of trading intent, and are subject to change at any time due to changes in market or economic conditions. It is not intended to indicate or imply that any illustration/example mentioned is now or was ever held in any portfolio. No forecasts can be guaranteed and there is no guarantee that the information supplied is complete or timely, nor are there any warranties with regard to the results obtained from its us.


Important information

Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.

Janus Henderson Horizon China Fund

Specific risks

  • Shares can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
  • The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which it trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations to the Fund.
  • Emerging markets are less established and more prone to political events than developed markets. This can mean both higher volatility and a greater risk of loss to the Fund than investing in more developed markets.
  • Changes in currency exchange rates may cause the value of your investment and any income from it to rise or fall.
  • If the Fund or a specific share class of the Fund seeks to reduce risks (such as exchange rate movements), the measures designed to do so may be ineffective, unavailable or detrimental.
  • Any security could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, increasing the risk of investment losses.

Risk rating

Share

Important message