Secured Credit Insight: EU directive for insolvency and restructuring

21/06/2019

Download

Following almost two and a half years of consultations, the European Council (EU) formally adopted new rules on business insolvency on 6 June 2019. Secured loans specialists within the Secured Credit Team, Elissa Johnson, Portfolio Manager and, Guillaume Bezard-Falgas, Associate Portfolio Manager, share their views and shed light on the new directive.


EU directive for insolvency and restructuring: good news for senior lenders

European secured loans (European loans) have performed strongly this year. For their investors, in particular senior lenders in the loan structures, the directive on ‘insolvency, restructuring and second chance’ is a welcome development, providing an extra layer of comfort.

This is an important matter for loan investors as it will impact their recovery prospects when a company is, or is likely to become, insolvent. Up until now, lending in certain EU countries has been a source of concern for senior creditors as the rules and procedures for recovery differs under differing regimes.

On 28 March 2019, European Parliament members (MEPs) approved a directive on ‘insolvency, restructuring and second chance’1 aimed at enhancing restructuring and insolvency rules in its Member States. This was then adopted by the EU Council on 6 June 20192. Thus, over the next two years, insolvency laws across Europe are likely to become more senior lender friendly, following recent trends that have seen Spain and the Netherlands, in particular, improve their insolvency and restructuring laws.

What does this EU directive bring to the table?
At the moment, insolvency regimes vary widely from country to country in the EU3, with some considered more creditor friendly than others (eg, UK versus France). Well known and tested procedures in the US or in the UK such as Chapter 11, the Scheme of Arrangement or ‘pre-pack’ (pre-packaged administration) do not necessarily have their equivalent in all European countries.

The directive is about promoting “entrepreneurial spirit by facilitating restructuring of companies in financial distress”. It is not an attempt to harmonise insolvency laws but to complement the regulations already in place. Thus, the goal is to agree on a balanced set of incentives and tools shared across the region for businesses and for capital to flow more easily.

The directive sets out measures for convergence around three themes:

  • The availability of a preventative restructuring framework involving certain common principles; for example, the negotiation of a restructuring plan while distressed companies can continue to operate and preserve jobs
  • A second chance for insolvent or over-indebted individual entrepreneurs through a full debt discharge after a maximum period of three years (not applicable to companies) 
  • Targeted measures to increase the efficiency of the insolvency, restructuring and discharge procedures.
What matters in practice?
From our perspective as loans managers, there are three key conditions in a pre-insolvency or insolvency scenario that mainly influence the outcome:
  • The ability for a procedure to be launched well ahead of what could become a business in terminal state due to long lasting financial distress
  • The legal recognition of the different classes of creditors and their respective priority of claim
  • The time and costs involved with the procedure
Based on this, the EU directive should effectively bring some positive developments. Law firms Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and White & Case have reviewed the potential implications for some European countries, among which we note the following for the main markets that we invest in:

Source: Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, White & Case, Janus Henderson Investors, as at 12 June 2019

Elsewhere, and in particular in Eastern Europe, changes required should be more significant given the existing insolvency regimes, which is why we have chosen to invest only in Western Europe to date.

A positive development
We welcome this move by the EU to improve insolvency regimes, which should benefit senior lenders, but as ever the devil is in the detail. Each member state will have two years to implement the directive in a way that fits its own insolvency regime. Thus, it will be open to interpretation and, domestic adoption will take time before being tested in each judiciary system.

Our track record in avoiding businesses, which default on their loan obligations, is significantly better than the market as a whole over the long-term and yet, we have delivered strong performance with lower risk.

Our focus: loss avoidance and low default rates

Source: Janus Henderson Investors, Credit Suisse, as at 31 May 2019
Note: Bid pricing, gross of fees, base currency. Reference index relates to the Credit Suisse Western European Leverage Loan Index. Past performance is not a guide to future performance.

We retain a conservative investment bias and apply higher investment hurdles for loans where the jurisdiction of the borrower has poor rights for senior lenders. Hence, in our view, any improvements in insolvency regimes that enhance recovery prospects would improve the risk/return available from the loan market.


Notes:
 
1Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on preventive restructuring frameworks, on discharge of debt and disqualifications, and on measures to increase the efficiency of procedures concerning restructuring, insolvency and discharge of debt.

2The original proposal for the directive was presented in November 2016 and an agreement by the European Council and the European Parliament regarding the shape of the directive, was reached in December 2018. Following the recent Parliament’s endorsement in March 2019, it was adopted at the European Council meeting in June 2019. Each European member state will then have two years to implement the directive.

3The Doing Business report published by the World Bank assigns doing business scores to 190 economies every year; a metric used for assessing the relative level of regulatory performance across countries. Looking at the 28 EU states’ scores, on the ease of resolving insolvency or their recovery rates, there is a fairly high level of discrepancy. Recoveries for example range from 33.2% (Greece) to 89.8% (the Netherlands) based on the 2019 report. 


 

These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. Any securities, funds, sectors and indices mentioned within this article do not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to buy or sell them.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.

The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.

For promotional purposes.


Important information

Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.

Janus Henderson Horizon Total Return Bond Fund

Specific risks

  • This fund is designed to be used only as one component in several in a diversified investment portfolio. Investors should consider carefully the proportion of their portfolio invested into this fund.
  • The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which it trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations to the Fund.
  • The value of a bond or money market instrument may fall if the financial health of the issuer weakens, or the market believes it may weaken. This risk is greater the lower the credit quality of the bond.
  • Emerging markets are less established and more prone to political events than developed markets. This can mean both higher volatility and a greater risk of loss to the Fund than investing in more developed markets.
  • Changes in currency exchange rates may cause the value of your investment and any income from it to rise or fall.
  • If the Fund or a specific share class of the Fund seeks to reduce risks (such as exchange rate movements), the measures designed to do so may be ineffective, unavailable or detrimental.
  • When interest rates rise (or fall), the prices of different securities will be affected differently. In particular, bond values generally fall when interest rates rise. This risk is generally greater the longer the maturity of a bond investment.
  • Any security could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, increasing the risk of investment losses.
  • Callable debt securities (securities whose issuers have the right to pay off the security’s principal before the maturity date), such as ABS or MBS, can be impacted from prepayment or extension of maturity. The value of your investment may fall as a result.

Risk rating

Janus Henderson Multi Asset Credit Fund

Specific risks

  • If a Fund has a high exposure to a particular country or geographical region it carries a higher level of risk than a Fund which is more broadly diversified.
  • An issuer of a bond (or money market instrument) may become unable or unwilling to pay interest or repay capital to the Fund. If this happens or the market perceives this may happen, the value of the bond will fall.
  • The Fund may use derivatives towards the aim of achieving its investment objective. This can result in 'leverage', which can magnify an investment outcome and gains or losses to the Fund may be greater than the cost of the derivative. Derivatives also introduce other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
  • If the Fund holds assets in currencies other than the base currency of the Fund or you invest in a share class of a different currency to the Fund (unless 'hedged'), the value of your investment may be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
  • The Fund invests in high yield (non-investment grade) bonds and while these generally offer higher rates of interest than investment grade bonds, they are more speculative and more sensitive to adverse changes in market conditions.
  • When interest rates rise (or fall), the prices of different securities will be affected differently. In particular, bond values generally fall when interest rates rise. This risk is generally greater the longer the maturity of a bond investment.
  • Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
  • Callable debt securities (securities whose issuers have the right to pay off the security’s principal before the maturity date), such as ABS or MBS, can be impacted from prepayment or extension of maturity. The value of your investment may fall as a result.

Risk rating

Share

Important message