July jobs report: Don’t let hiring hesitation distract from secular trends

The Labor Department reported on Friday that the U.S. economy added only 73,000 jobs in July, a significant slowdown from previous months and well below economists’ forecasts of 115,000.¹ The unemployment rate rose slightly to 4.2%, which was in line with expectations but up from 4.1% the month before.

In addition to July’s disappointing headline number, estimates for job growth in May and June were revised downward by a combined 258,000 jobs, revealing that the labor market was weaker than previously reported throughout late spring and early summer.

Heightened odds for September easing

The employment miss meaningfully increases the odds of a September interest rate cut. The Fed has repeatedly emphasized its data-dependent approach, and at last week’s press conference, officials noted they were on the lookout for “downside risks to the labor market.” The weakness revealed in payroll revisions could shift the central bank’s focus within its dual mandate more toward maximum employment versus price stability.

Market expectations for a September cut have surged to 93%, up from just 42% before the jobs report. While the dissent from two Fed governors at last week’s Fed meeting was not surprising, it was a sign that the case for cutting rates had been gaining momentum. Another weak employment report with poor job gains and rising unemployment would only add to the likelihood of a September cut or could increase the odds of a 50 basis-point reduction, even with elevated inflation.

If it comes, we would view a cut as supportive of the economy; however, a September cut is not definitive. Payroll data can be volatile, and a bounce back in the next report could quickly change the narrative, as it did late last year. Also, Powell emphasized watching the unemployment rate, which encompasses both supply and demand components of labor, not just the change in payrolls. The unemployment rate, while rising, remains relatively low, with slower growth of labor supply offsetting the slower hiring. Additionally, a number of inflation data points will be released before the September meeting, which could influence the decision.

Enduring resilience

Despite initial indications of labor market softening, the broader economy remains resilient with slower but positive growth. Corporate balance sheets generally remain in a position of strength, with reduced debt levels post-pandemic and extremely low default rates even amid higher interest rates.

The positive corporate earnings picture is also intact. According to FactSet, with roughly 66% of S&P 500 companies reporting as of 1 August 2025, both the percentage of companies with positive earnings surprises and the magnitude of those surprises exceed 10-year averages.²

The consumer, too, remains healthy. Consumer debt service requirements relative to disposable income sit below normal levels, providing capacity for continued spending. Recent commentary from credit card providers and weekly spending indicators show consumer spending is solid.

These factors support our view that the employment picture reflects a nuanced shift rather than broad economic deterioration. Initial jobless claims and recent layoff data show that companies aren’t firing workers, but they’ve become hesitant to hire as continuing claims have not decreased. This pattern makes sense given uncertainty around trade, tax, immigration, and deregulation policies, as well as AI’s potential impact on productivity.

AI: The productivity wild card

AI infrastructure capital expenditure has been a major theme of late, with spending by major tech companies surging and setting new records, continuing to support market trends. Additionally, company management commentary increasingly reflects intensified discussions about AI’s impact on future headcounts. This suggests the labor market may not grow as rapidly as in past cycles due to potential AI-driven efficiencies.

More broadly, significant advancements in AI are expected to boost productivity. Rising productivity benefits corporate margins by enabling more output without proportional increases in labor or materials that could otherwise fuel inflation. From a macroeconomic perspective, improving productivity supports sustainable wage growth and consumer spending power.

Investment implications

Economic releases like Friday’s jobs data can be noisy and drive short-term volatility. Our focus remains on longer-term economic trends and several durable growth themes, including innovation in AI and healthcare, growth in the digital economy, and the electrification of the economy. We believe these areas continue to present solid opportunities for earnings growth and capital appreciation.

In fixed income, with the federal funds rate at 4.375% and the probability of cuts on the rise, taking interest rate risk on the front end of the yield curve can provide portfolio diversification and offer a cushion against potential volatility in equities or credit. Attractive starting yields are also on offer for investors seeking income in the current market, as well as those positioning for a changing interest rate environment.

Policy timing and the long view

We recognize near-term soft patches are possible as tariffs, stimulative tax and deregulation policies, and potential Fed easing unfold and work through the economy – and as the results of AI-driven capital spending start to show. With the latter point, we anticipate a need to shift perspective where the labor market is concerned as AI-driven productivity gains impact future headcount needs. Ultimately, though, we consider the economy to be on solid footing and remain focused on the long-run tailwinds that may be created through policy change and secular growth drivers.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION 

Artificial intelligence (“AI”) focused companies may face rapid product obsolescence, intense competition, and increased regulatory scrutiny. These companies often rely heavily on intellectual property and invest significantly in research and development, which may not yield successful outcomes. Their securities may be more volatile than those of companies offering more established technologies.

Diversification neither assures a profit nor eliminates the risk of experiencing investment losses

Equity securities are subject to risks including market risk. Returns will fluctuate in response to issuer, political and economic developments.

Fixed income securities are subject to interest rate, inflation, credit and default risk.  The bond market is volatile. As interest rates rise, bond prices usually fall, and vice versa.  The return of principal is not guaranteed, and prices may decline if an issuer fails to make timely payments or its credit strength weakens.