Status under the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR)

Janus Henderson Horizon Fund – Strategic Bond Fund

Legal entity identifier: 213800MABR4GJROFPI91

A. Summary

The Fund is categorised as one which meets the provisions set out in Article 8 of SFDR as a product which promotes environmental and/or social characteristics and invests in companies with good governance practices. Whilst the Fund does not have as its objective a sustainable investment, it will have a minimum proportion of 10% of sustainable investments with a social objective and an environmental objective in economic activities that do not qualify as environmentally sustainable under the EU Taxonomy.

The Fund promotes climate change mitigation and support for the UNGC principles (which cover matters including human rights, labour, corruption, and environmental pollution and avoids investments in certain activities with the potential to cause harm to human health and wellbeing. The Fund also leverages a proprietary ESG framework, utilising both third party data and proprietary insights, that incorporates at least 20 metrics across environmental, social, and governance factors to produce country-level ESG ratings ranging from AAA to CCC. To encourage the adoption of better environmental and/or social practices the Fund will only invest in sovereign issuers rated B or higher. The Fund does not use a reference benchmark to attain its environmental or social characteristics. In addition, the Fund invests a minimum of 10% of its net asset value in sustainable investments.

This Fund seeks a combination of capital and income returns through exposure to a broad range of global fixed income asset classes.  The exclusionary screens are implemented on both a pre and post trade basis enabling the sub investment advisor to block any proposed transactions in an excluded security and identify any changes to the status of holdings when third-party data is periodically updated. The binding elements of the investment strategy described below are implemented as exclusionary screens within the Investment Manager’s order management system utilising third-party data provider(s) on an ongoing basis. One binding element is not included as an exclusionary screen within the order management system, this is “the corporate bond portion of the Fund will aim to have a lower carbon intensity than its relevant reference universe on a monthly basis”. This commitment is monitored on a monthly basis by comparing the carbon intensity number of the portfolio and its relevant reference universe as calculated by a third-party data provider.

The Investment Manager uses specific screens to help achieve some of the promoted characteristics. For example- to promote climate change mitigation, screens are applied to avoid investment in certain high carbon activities, and it is expected that this will result in the fund having a lower carbon profile.  Another example is that to promote support for the UNGC Principles, screens are applied so that the Fund does not invest in issuers that are in breach of the UNGC Principles based on third party data and/or internal research. The Investment Manager applies screens to exclude direct investment in corporate issuers based on their involvement in certain activities. Specifically, issuers are excluded if they derive more than 10% of their revenue from oil and gas generation and production, oil sands extraction, shale energy extraction, thermal coal extraction and power generation, Arctic oil and gas extraction, tobacco, fur, adult entertainment, gambling or controversial weapons. Issuers are also excluded if they are deemed to have failed to comply with the UNGC Principles (which cover matters including human rights, labour, corruption, and environmental pollution). The Investment Manager leverages a proprietary ESG framework, utilising both third party data and proprietary insights, that incorporates at least 20 metrics across environmental, social, and governance factors to produce country-level ESG ratings ranging from AAA to CCC. To encourage the adoption of better environmental and/or social practices the Fund will only invest in sovereign issuers rated B or higher.

The Fund also applies the Firmwide Exclusions Policy (see “Firmwide Exclusions” in the "JHI Responsible Investment Policy”), which includes controversial weapons.

The corporate bond portion of the Fund will aim to have a lower carbon intensity than its relevant reference universe on a monthly basis.

The Investment Manager excludes from the Fund sovereign bond issuers that have been sanctioned under the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime or the UN sanctions regime and/or have not attained a sufficiently high score (e.g., ‘free’) under the Freedom House Index that promotes political rights and civil liberties (or other such similar index as determined by the Investment Manager).

For the purposes of the AMF doctrine, the extra-financial analysis or rating as described above is higher than:

1. 90% for equities issued by large capitalisation companies whose registered office is located in "developed" countries, debt securities and money market instruments with an investment grade credit rating, sovereign debt issued by developed countries;
2. 75% for equities issued by large capitalisations whose registered office is located in "emerging" countries, equities issued by small and medium capitalisations, debt securities and money market instruments with a high yield credit rating and sovereign debt issued by "emerging" countries.

The Investment Manager may only invest in companies that would be excluded by the screens described above if the Investment Manager believes, based on its own research and as approved by its ESG Oversight Committee, that the third-party data used to apply the exclusions is insufficient or inaccurate.

The Investment Manager may consider that the data is insufficient or inaccurate if, for example, the third-party data provider research is historic, vague, based on out of date sources, or the investment manager has other information to make them doubt the accuracy of the research.  If the Investment Manager wishes to challenge the third-party data, then the challenge is presented to a cross-functional ESG Oversight Committee who must sign off on the “override” of the third-party data.  If a third party data provider does not provide research on a specific issuer or excluded activity, the Investment Manager may invest if, through its own research, it is satisfied that the issuer is not involved in the excluded activity.

JHI has chosen MSCI as its primary data source for ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) research. Where coverage gaps are identified, specialist ESG Data vendors or inhouse research may be used to complement the ESG research. This ensures helps ensure that consistent data and methodologies are used given an ESG measure per security type and hence can be compared correctly in the portfolio construction process. The JHI Responsible Investment Policy sets out the firmwide approach to ESG Integration Principles, including JHI’s Responsible Investment Principles for long-term investment success, our approaches to Stewardship and Engagement and Firmwide Exclusions applied to investee companies.