Hiding in plain sight: The investment case for healthcare
Though healthcare may have flown under the market’s radar this year, the sector’s attractive valuations and new growth opportunities are not to be overlooked, say Portfolio Managers Andy Acker and Dan Lyons.
7 minute read
- The healthcare sector has traded at a discount to the S&P 500® Index this year and looks attractive relative to other defensive sectors – at a time when the economic outlook remains uncertain.
- Meanwhile, innovation and tailwinds such as aging populations should be growth drivers for the sector for years to come.
- This combination of attractive valuations and new growth opportunities could help lift future returns.
Healthcare stock returns have been essentially flat so far in 2023, which may lead some investors to overlook the sector.1 That could be a mistake given recent trends that, in our view, make the case for investing in healthcare even more compelling.
A history of downside protection
Although expectations for a recession have diminished, we believe the chances of an economic slowdown remain significant and underappreciated. The effects of monetary-tightening cycles take one to two years to fully materialize as higher rates and more restrictive lending work their way through the economy. Should a downturn occur, healthcare could be a port of refuge: Since 2000, the MSCI World Health Care IndexSM has, on average, captured just 47% of the downside when the MSCI World IndexSM has declined by 15% or more (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Healthcare’s performance and downside capture
Source: Janus Henderson Investors, FactSet, as of 30 June 2023. Chart reflects market declines of 15% or greater in the MSCI World Index since 2000. Index performance does not reflect the expenses of managing a portfolio as an index is unmanaged and not available for direct investment. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal and fluctuation of value.
Even if a recession is avoided, healthcare could still perform well. Strong employment, for example, drives demand for employer-provided insurance policies, benefiting managed care providers. And positive clinical trial data and regulatory approvals can propel stocks higher regardless of the economic backdrop. This past May, one drugmaker saw its shares more than double in a single day after delivering groundbreaking data for its ovarian cancer drug candidate. Another firm saw double-digit gains after delivering positive data for a promising pneumococcal vaccine.
The healthcare sector trades at a discount to the broader equity market and roughly in line with its own long-term average. That is comparatively better than other traditionally defensive sectors, which as of the end of August traded at premiums to their historical valuations. In addition, after one of the worst drawdowns on record (Feb 2021 – May 2022), many biotechnology stocks trade at substantially depressed levels, with many priced below the level of cash on their balance sheets (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Healthcare looks comparatively attractive
Price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios based on estimated forward 12-month earnings
Source: Bloomberg, as of 31 August 2023. Average is for the 30-year trailing period. Data based on quarterly forward P/Es for the S&P 500 Index, the S&P 500 Health Care Sector, the S&P 500 Biotechnology subsector, the S&P Consumer Staples Sector, and the S&P Utilities Sector.
Some of this reflects the overhang from COVID-19: After the public health emergency ended, sales of vaccines and therapeutics declined sharply in 2023. That has also weighed on the fortunes of life sciences tools makers, which supply the components for manufacturing biologics. Meanwhile, a rebound in routine medical care, which many put off during the pandemic, has threatened to raise costs for insurers.
In our view, this reversion to the mean is more a return to normalcy and likely to be short-lived. Case in point: Insurers reported better-than-expected earnings during the second quarter as companies increasingly shifted to value-based services, keeping a lid on expenses. Premium increases next year could also help defray higher costs. Meanwhile, as COVID-19 wanes, other therapeutic areas such as obesity and Alzheimer’s are taking off, with the potential to lift revenues for branded drugs and tools.
Indeed, rapid advances in clinical research have continued across numerous disease categories. This year, more than 80 novel medicines are up for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review, with more than half already approved.2 That puts the sector on track for a record year of drug launches and creates the potential for years of revenue expansion, as drug product cycles typically last 10 years or longer.
This innovation has ignited a surge in mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Thirteen deals valued at $1 billion or more each have been announced so far in 2023, the most of any year in recent memory (Figure 3). Small- and mid-cap biotech companies have been the biggest targets of acquisitions – and the biggest beneficiaries, with some fetching premiums of between 60% and 100% (and even more).
Figure 3: M&A takes off
Source: Thomson Reuters, TD Cowen. Includes only deals ≥$1B USD. *2023 data as of 4 September 2023.
A complex sector ripe for stock picking
To be sure, many blockbuster drugs are set to lose patent protection by the end of the decade. (A blockbuster drug is defined as having sales of $1 billion or more annually.) There are also worries about the impact of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) on drug prices in the U.S. and the affordability of healthcare globally.
But as is often the case in healthcare, the details matter. Patent expirations, for one, have been another catalyst for M&A, as large-cap biopharma companies, flush with cash, seek to replenish pipelines. And while the loss of exclusivity opens some branded drugs to competition, it also works to improve affordability for patients and free up capital for the system to invest in newer innovations.
Regulation is also nuanced. Although the IRA allows Medicare, the U.S. insurance plan for the elderly, to negotiate prices for select drugs starting in 2026, the mandate comes with caveats. Orphan drugs (those treating rare diseases) are excluded. Small molecule medicines are exempt from negotiation for nine years and biologics for 13 years – around the time branded drugs lose patent protection anyway. Some aspects of the law could even be beneficial for the industry: Starting in 2025, out-of-pocket drug costs for seniors will be capped at $2,000 annually, which should improve affordability and perhaps grow sales volumes.
Given these complexities, along with the inherent risk of drug development, it’s no wonder there is a wide disparity between healthcare’s top- and bottom-performing stocks each year (Figure 4). As such, benchmark returns rarely reflect the full picture for the sector – or the investment opportunity.
Figure 4: A wide gap between healthcare’s top- and bottom-performing stocks
Source: Wilshire 5000 Index. Data from 2013-2022. Based on analysis of 10-year period.
A long runway of growth
It’s also worth considering the long term. Although healthcare spending is already substantial – in the U.S. it accounts for about 18% of the nation’s gross domestic product3– we still see room for growth.
Demographics are one reason. By 2050, the number of people aged 60 and over is set to reach 2 billion, roughly double the figure in 2020.4 That age cohort typically spends three times more on healthcare than younger populations.5
Advances in medicine are also doing their part. Consider cystic fibrosis (CF): About a decade ago, the average life expectancy for CF patients was around 30 years. Now, thanks to improved therapies, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation projects children born with CF today will live beyond 50 years. By extending lifespans, new therapies prolong demand and create more medical needs, spawning new companies and products.
With innovation expanding at a rapid clip and some of the largest drivers of mortality starting to get addressed, we believe this growth driver will only become stronger in the coming years. Investors should take notice.
1 Bloomberg, as of 31 August 2023. Returns are for the S&P 500 Health Care Sector and the MSCI World Health Care Index.
2 Food and Drug Administration, as of 31 August 2023.
3 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, data for 2021.
4 World Health Organization, “Ageing and Health,” as of 1 October 2022.
5 JAMA Network, “Comparison of Health Care Spending by Age in 8 High-Income Countries,” 6 August 2020. Data reflect 2015 figures for those age 65 and older for Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, Switzerland, the UK and the U.S.
S&P 500® Index reflects U.S. large-cap equity performance and represents broad U.S. equity market performance.
MSCI World Health Care Index℠ reflects the performance of health care stocks from global developed markets.
MSCI World Index℠ reflects the equity market performance of global developed markets.
Quantitative Tightening (QT) is a government monetary policy occasionally used to decrease the money supply by either selling government securities or letting them mature and removing them from its cash balances.
Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio measures share price compared to earnings per share for a stock or stocks in a portfolio.
Healthcare industries are subject to government regulation and reimbursement rates, as well as government approval of products and services, which could have a significant effect on price and availability, and can be significantly affected by rapid obsolescence and patent expirations.
Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.
- Shares/Units can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
- Shares of small and mid-size companies can be more volatile than shares of larger companies, and at times it may be difficult to value or to sell shares at desired times and prices, increasing the risk of losses.
- If a Fund has a high exposure to a particular country or geographical region it carries a higher level of risk than a Fund which is more broadly diversified.
- The Fund is focused towards particular industries or investment themes and may be heavily impacted by factors such as changes in government regulation, increased price competition, technological advancements and other adverse events.
- The Fund may use derivatives to help achieve its investment objective. This can result in leverage (higher levels of debt), which can magnify an investment outcome. Gains or losses to the Fund may therefore be greater than the cost of the derivative. Derivatives also introduce other risks, in particular, that a derivative counterparty may not meet its contractual obligations.
- If the Fund holds assets in currencies other than the base currency of the Fund, or you invest in a share/unit class of a different currency to the Fund (unless hedged, i.e. mitigated by taking an offsetting position in a related security), the value of your investment may be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
- When the Fund, or a share/unit class, seeks to mitigate exchange rate movements of a currency relative to the base currency (hedge), the hedging strategy itself may positively or negatively impact the value of the Fund due to differences in short-term interest rates between the currencies.
- Securities within the Fund could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, especially in extreme market conditions when asset prices may be falling, increasing the risk of investment losses.
- The Fund may incur a higher level of transaction costs as a result of investing in less actively traded or less developed markets compared to a fund that invests in more active/developed markets.
- The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which the Fund trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations, or as a result of failure or delay in operational processes or the failure of a third party provider.