Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility What’s behind the divergence between international and U.S. tech? - Janus Henderson Investors - Italy Investor
Per investitori privati in Italia

What’s behind the divergence between international and U.S. tech?

International technology stocks have recently decoupled from their U.S. peers. Portfolio Manager Julian McManus explores the drivers behind the divergence and why fundamentals and a differentiated opportunity set could continue to support the sector.

11 Mar 2026
5 minute read

Key takeaways:

  • After largely tracking the U.S. tech sector through much of 2025, international technology stocks decoupled late in the year, meaningfully outperforming U.S. peers.
  • The data point to robust earnings growth, not multiple expansion, as the primary driver. Valuations across non-U.S. technology actually compressed as prices rose.
  • The technology landscape outside the U.S. is heavily weighted toward firms at the center of the AI infrastructure buildout. With valuations still deeply discounted to the U.S., we think international markets offer good hunting ground for leading tech companies that stand to benefit from accelerating AI investment rather than be disrupted by it.

After roughly tracking the U.S. tech sector through much of 2025, international technology stocks staged a notable breakout at the end of the year. While U.S. tech traded sideways-to-lower through February 2026 amid concerns about hyperscaler capital spending (and related funding and monetization scrutiny) as well as the threat of business-model disruption from agentic AI, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Information Technology (IT) Index moved sharply higher (Exhibit 1). For investors used to viewing U.S. mega-caps as the default expression of technology exposure, this divergence warrants a closer look.

Exhibit 1: International technology stocks have decoupled from U.S. peers

Price performance, 3 March 2025 to 6 March 2026.

Source: Bloomberg, data from 3 March 2025 to 6 March 2026. MSCI ACWI ex USA Information Technology Index, S&P 500® Information Technology Index. Past performance does not predict future results.

Strong earnings have underpinned the rally

Given the magnitude of the rally, one might assume it had been driven by multiple expansion – share prices getting ahead of fundamentals. However, the data tells a different story: It points to earnings growth as the primary driver, with the rise in stock prices accompanied by an equally powerful move in analyst estimates.

Exhibit 2: Earnings growth has been a key driver behind the recent rally

Next 12-month forward earnings estimates have kept pace with the rise in share prices.

Source: Bloomberg, data from 1 January 2024 to 6 March 2026. Past performance does not predict future results.

These upward revisions have been fueled largely by sustained AI infrastructure investment, which has extended beyond hyperscalers to enterprise customers and sovereign-backed initiatives. The rising demand for computing power has also supported a renewed upcycle in the memory market, where tight supply has pushed prices higher and quickly translated into realized revenues.

Unlike the U.S., where software firms comprise a large share of the technology sector, overseas markets are disproportionately weighted toward the “picks and shovel makers” at the heart of the AI infrastructure buildout. Most of the leading memory chipmakers and many of the most critical semiconductor equipment and wafer manufacturers are listed outside the U.S., predominantly in Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and the Netherlands.

Earnings growth has kept valuations in check

Meanwhile, valuations have become more attractive, and the discount to U.S. tech stocks remains historically wide. In recent months, the forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio for the MSCI ACWI ex USA IT Index has compressed, not expanded, as growth in the denominator (earnings per share) has more than outweighed the higher price. By this measure, non-U.S. technology appears cheaper today than before the rally began.

Exhibit 3: Non-U.S. technology continues to trade at a discount to the U.S.

Price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios for international technology stocks have compressed during the rally, with valuations still deeply discounted relative to U.S. peers.

Source: Bloomberg, data from 28 February 2016 to 3 March 2026. P/Es are based on forward 12-month estimated earnings. Past performance does not predict future results.

We highlighted this valuation disconnect in our 2026 outlook and continue to believe the gap between U.S. technology companies and many leading international firms presents a compelling opportunity for investors with a long-term view.

International markets offer fertile ground for discerning investors

As the AI growth story matures, investor scrutiny is intensifying, making selectivity all the more crucial. The turbulence that rippled through software and technology-adjacent sectors in February served as a reminder of how quickly sentiment can turn against companies viewed as being on the wrong end of AI proliferation.

International markets, in our view, offer a deep opportunity set of technology firms whose businesses are poised to benefit from accelerating AI investment rather than being disrupted by it.

Putting macro-driven volatility in context

While the fundamental backdrop remains supportive, an increasingly tense geopolitical environment has the potential to create bouts of volatility. Case in point, the coordinated U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran – and concerns about a prolonged Middle East conflict – which triggered heavy selling across international markets in early March. The prospect of sharply higher crude prices and knock-on inflation effects weighed particularly hard on oil-importing countries. And with the shift toward “risk-off” sentiment, many Asian technology stocks experienced a sharp pullback as investors sold indiscriminately.

Such knee-jerk reactions to exogenous shocks are not unusual – particularly after stretches of strong outperformance. However, they do not alter our view of the underlying fundamentals for companies that play an integral role in the AI infrastructure buildout. We continue to focus on businesses with differentiated capabilities and durable competitive positions where growth prospects and valuations support room for further upside.

Near-term volatility can create opportunities for active management. In our view, a disciplined approach, grounded in deep fundamental research, will remain essential to identifying long-term winners as the global technology landscape evolves.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Artificial intelligence (“AI”) focused companies, including those that develop or utilize AI technologies, may face rapid product obsolescence, intense competition, and increased regulatory scrutiny. These companies often rely heavily on intellectual property, invest significantly in research and development, and depend on maintaining and growing consumer demand. Their securities may be more volatile than those of companies offering more established technologies and may be affected by risks tied to the use of AI in business operations, including legal liability or reputational harm.

Foreign securities are subject to additional risks including currency fluctuations, political and economic uncertainty, increased volatility, lower liquidity and differing financial and information reporting standards, all of which are magnified in emerging markets.

Technology industries can be significantly affected by obsolescence of existing technology, short product cycles, falling prices and profits, competition from new market entrants, and general economic conditions. A concentrated investment in a single industry could be more volatile than the performance of less concentrated investments and the market as a whole.

Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio measures share price compared to earnings per share for a stock or stocks in a portfolio.

The MSCI ACWI ex USA Information Technology Index includes large- and mid-cap stocks across 22 of 23 Developed Markets (DM) countries (excluding the U.S.) and 24 Emerging Markets (EM) countries classified in the GICS® Information Technology sector.

The S&P 500® Information Technology Index comprises stocks included in the S&P 500 classified in the GICS® Information Technology sector.

Volatility measures risk using the dispersion of returns for a given investment.

Queste sono le opinioni dell'autore al momento della pubblicazione e possono differire da quelle di altri individui/team di Janus Henderson Investors. I riferimenti a singoli titoli non costituiscono una raccomandazione all'acquisto, alla vendita o alla detenzione di un titolo, di una strategia d'investimento o di un settore di mercato e non devono essere considerati redditizi. Janus Henderson Investors, le sue affiliate o i suoi dipendenti possono avere un’esposizione nei titoli citati.

 

Le performance passate non sono indicative dei rendimenti futuri. Tutti i dati dei rendimenti includono sia il reddito che le plusvalenze o le eventuali perdite ma sono al lordo dei costi delle commissioni dovuti al momento dell'emissione.

 

Le informazioni contenute in questo articolo non devono essere intese come una guida all'investimento.

 

Non vi è alcuna garanzia che le tendenze passate continuino o che le previsioni si realizzino.

 

Comunicazione di Marketing.

 

Glossario

 

 

 

Important information

Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.

Janus Henderson Horizon Fund (il “Fondo”) è una SICAV lussemburghese costituita il 30 maggio 1985 e gestita da Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. può decidere di risolvere gli accordi di commercializzazione di questo Organismo d'investimento collettivo del risparmio in conformità alla normativa applicabile. Questa è una comunicazione di marketing. Consultare il prospetto dell’OICVM e il KIID prima di prendere qualsiasi decisione finale di investimento.
Janus Henderson Fund (il “Fondo”) è una SICAV lussemburghese costituita il 26 settembre 2000 e gestita da Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. Janus Henderson Investors Europe S.A. può decidere di risolvere gli accordi di commercializzazione di questo Organismo d'investimento collettivo del risparmio in conformità alla normativa applicabile. Questa è una comunicazione di marketing. Consultare il prospetto dell’OICVM e il KIID prima di prendere qualsiasi decisione finale di investimento.
    Specific risks
  • Le Azioni/Quote possono perdere valore rapidamente e di norma implicano rischi più elevati rispetto alle obbligazioni o agli strumenti del mercato monetario. Di conseguenza il valore del proprio investimento potrebbe diminuire.
  • I mercati emergenti espongono il Fondo a una volatilità più elevata e a un maggior rischio di perdite rispetto ai mercati sviluppati; sono sensibili a eventi politici ed economici negativi e possono essere meno ben regolamentati e prevedere procedure di custodia e regolamento meno solide.
  • Il Fondo potrebbe usare derivati al fine di ridurre il rischio o gestire il portafoglio in modo più efficiente. Ciò, tuttavia, comporta rischi aggiuntivi, in particolare il rischio che la controparte del derivato non adempia ai suoi obblighi contrattuali.
  • Qualora il Fondo detenga attività in valute diverse da quella di base del Fondo o l'investitore detenga azioni o quote in un'altra valuta (a meno che non siano "coperte"), il valore dell'investimento potrebbe subire le oscillazioni del tasso di cambio.
  • Se il Fondo, o una sua classe di azioni con copertura, intende attenuare le fluttuazioni del tasso di cambio tra una valuta e la valuta di base, la stessa strategia di copertura potrebbe generare un effetto positivo o negativo sul valore del Fondo, a causa delle differenze di tasso d’interesse a breve termine tra le due valute.
  • I titoli del Fondo potrebbero diventare difficili da valutare o da vendere al prezzo e con le tempistiche desiderati, specie in condizioni di mercato estreme con il prezzo delle attività in calo, aumentando il rischio di perdite sull'investimento.
  • Il Fondo potrebbe perdere denaro se una controparte con la quale il Fondo effettua scambi non fosse più intenzionata ad adempiere ai propri obblighi, o a causa di un errore o di un ritardo nei processi operativi o di una negligenza di un fornitore terzo.