Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Navigating biotech’s “haves” and “have-nots” - Janus Henderson Investors
For Institutional Investors in Australia

Navigating biotech’s “haves” and “have-nots”

A widening gap in performance between firms with positive clinical data and those without is creating opportunities for stock picking, say Portfolio Managers Andy Acker and Dan Lyons.

Andy Acker, CFA

Andy Acker, CFA

Portfolio Manager


Daniel Lyons, PhD, CFA

Daniel Lyons, PhD, CFA

Portfolio Manager | Research Analyst


Oct 17, 2023
2 minute watch

Key takeaways:

  • While the disparity between biotech’s winning and losing stocks is often among the widest of any industry, rising interest rates and tight capital markets have enlarged the gap.
  • Many “have-nots” are either going out of business or having their public listing taken over by a private company in a transaction known as a reverse merger.
  • In our view, this process of industry rationalization creates a stock picker’s environment.

Andy Acker: Biotech, it’s always looked at as a monolith. But we talk about healthcare having the biggest disparity between winners and losers. In biotech, it’s even more extreme. In any given year over the last decade, the difference between the winners and losers is seventeen-fold. So, the top five biotech stocks will nearly quadruple every given year, while the bottom five lose almost 80% of their value.

It’s really critical to identify exciting innovation in the sector. Those stocks can potentially do well, even if the overall biotech market is not going up.

Dan Lyons: What we’ve seen in the sector is really a divergence between the haves and have-nots. But among the companies that have come out with truly innovative data, they’re able to control their own destiny. Even in a rising rate environment, they’ve been able to raise substantial amounts of capital and go forward with their programs alone, which also sets them up to negotiate well if there is potential M&A [mergers and acquisitions] down the road.

On the flipside, we’ve seen the have-nots with either disappointing data, or poor balance sheets, or too much opex [operating expenses] really struggling in this environment. And there are a lot of companies in the index that need to be cleaned up. We call them zombie companies that maybe they have some cash left, but not much else. And we’re seeing a lot of reverse mergers among promising private companies coming to market through that channel.

 

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Health care industries are subject to government regulation and reimbursement rates, as well as government approval of products and services, which could have a significant effect on price and availability, and can be significantly affected by rapid obsolescence and patent expirations.

This information is issued by Janus Henderson Investors (Australia) Institutional Funds Management Limited (AFSL 444266, ABN 16 165 119 531). The information herein shall not in any way constitute advice or an invitation to invest. It is solely for information purposes and subject to change without notice. This information does not purport to be a comprehensive statement or description of any markets or securities referred to within. Any references to individual securities do not constitute a securities recommendation. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.

 

 

Whilst Janus Henderson Investors (Australia) Institutional Funds Management Limited believe that the information is correct at the date of this document, no warranty or representation is given to this effect and no responsibility can be accepted by Janus Henderson Investors (Australia) Institutional Funds Management Limited to any end users for any action taken on the basis of this information. All opinions and estimates in this information are subject to change without notice and are the views of the author at the time of publication. Janus Henderson Investors (Australia) Institutional Funds Management Limited is not under any obligation to update this information to the extent that it is or becomes out of date or incorrect.

Andy Acker, CFA

Andy Acker, CFA

Portfolio Manager


Daniel Lyons, PhD, CFA

Daniel Lyons, PhD, CFA

Portfolio Manager | Research Analyst


Oct 17, 2023
2 minute watch

Key takeaways:

  • While the disparity between biotech’s winning and losing stocks is often among the widest of any industry, rising interest rates and tight capital markets have enlarged the gap.
  • Many “have-nots” are either going out of business or having their public listing taken over by a private company in a transaction known as a reverse merger.
  • In our view, this process of industry rationalization creates a stock picker’s environment.