Japan: Land of the rising dividend?



 Japan is home to many profitable companies that have significant levels of cash on their balance sheets but which have been relatively poor historically at distributing profits to shareholders. With this in mind, Ben Lofthouse, portfolio manager in the Global Equity Income Team, investigates the potential for dividend growth from the world’s third largest economy.

Dividend growth
Dividends from Japanese companies grew rapidly in 2015 in local currency terms and the recent strengthening of the Japanese yen – which additionally boosts returns for overseas holders of Japanese assets – has provided a further fillip. Dividend growth in the first quarter of 2016 compared with the same period a year earlier was 21.1% in headline terms1 (10.5% underlying), according to the latest data available from the quarterly Henderson Global Dividend Index (HGDI). The HGDI is a long-term study into global dividend trends from the world’s largest 1,200 firms by market capitalisation, based in US dollars.
1Headline dividends reflect the total sum of payouts received within the HGDI in US dollar terms. Underlying dividends are adjusted for special dividends, changes in currencies, timing effects and index changes.

Source: Henderson Global Investors as at 31 March 2016. Index level measures the progress firms are making in paying dividends, using 2009 as a base year with a value of 100, calculated in US dollars. Figures relate to headline dividends.
Corporate efficiency
While the recent pick-up in dividend growth in Japan is encouraging, comparisons with other developed markets can be revealing. Return on equity (RoE), for example, which measures how efficient businesses are at generating earnings from shareholders’ capital has been frustratingly low. In 2015, for instance, RoE in Japan was 8.7%, according to Citi Research, well below the US (16.4%), UK (13.2%), Australia (12.3%) and Europe ex-UK (11.4%).
Japan also has a history of cross-shareholdings (interlocking share ownership) between Japanese companies dating back to just after World War II, with banks among the biggest shareholders. The Tokyo Stock Exchange defines cross-shareholdings as ‘listed companies holding the shares of other listed companies for reasons other than pure investment purposes, for example, to strengthen business relationships’. Cross-ownership has led to the creation of conglomerate-style corporations where core businesses are often diluted. It has also led to interdependence of share prices that might otherwise have been uncorrelated.
Shareholder value could clearly be created through corporate efficiencies. One means of doing this could be through improved company board independence. At present, Japanese firms typically have less than 10% of their boards made up of outside independent directors according to ISS/Macquarie research. In contrast, US, German, Swiss and Australian companies, for example, typically have 50% or more independent board members.
In addition, many Japanese companies have had fixed dividend payout ratios based on a fixed percentage of their earnings. This has led to volatility in dividend payments as earnings have fluctuated.
Despite these issues, overseas share ownership of Japanese companies has increased in recent years from 4% in 1987 to around 31% in 2015 according to Bank of Japan / Macquarie Research.
Improved governance
In June 2015 ‘Japan’s Corporate Governance Code’ was introduced as part of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s ‘third arrow’ in an attempt to boost the economy and drive shareholder-friendly corporate governance reform.
One of the code’s main objectives is to promote transparent, fair, timely and effective decision-making by Japanese businesses. Companies are encouraged to appoint at least two independent directors, disclose cross-shareholdings and examine the rationale for major cross-ownership on an annual basis.
Strategy positioning
We are seeing some more opportunities for Japan, with companies announcing better dividend payments. Having said that, the market only yields around 2% at present, and with only 10.7% of the Japanese market expected to yield more than 3% looking ahead 12 months, it is proving challenging to find companies with an attractive dividend yield2. At present, Henderson International Income Trust only has limited exposure to Japan but as the reforms take hold and the dividend culture becomes more embedded we would expect to see more opportunities to invest in Japanese companies that meet our investment criteria.
2Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream, MSCI Japan Index, at 30 June 2016.

These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. Any securities, funds, sectors and indices mentioned within this article do not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to buy or sell them.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.

The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.

For promotional purposes.

Important information

Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.

Henderson International Income Trust plc

Before investing in an investment trust referred to in this document, you should satisfy yourself as to its suitability and the risks involved, you may wish to consult a financial adviser.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Tax assumptions and reliefs depend upon an investor’s particular circumstances and may change if those circumstances or the law change.

Nothing in this document is intended to or should be construed as advice. This document is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment. It does not form part of any contract for the sale or purchase of any investment.

Issued in the UK by Janus Henderson Investors. Janus Henderson Investors is the name under which Henderson Global Investors Limited (reg. no. 906355), Henderson Investment Funds Limited (reg. no. 2678531), AlphaGen Capital Limited (reg. no. 962757), Henderson Equity Partners Limited (reg. no.2606646), (each incorporated and registered in England and Wales with registered office at 201 Bishopsgate, London EC2M 3AE) are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority to provide investment products and services. We may record telephone calls for our mutual protection, to improve customer service and for regulatory record keeping purposes.

Specific risks

  • Active management techniques that have worked well in normal market conditions could prove ineffective or detrimental at other times.
  • This trust is suitable to be used as one component in several in a diversified investment portfolio. Investors should consider carefully the proportion of their portfolio invested into this trust.
  • The trust could lose money if a counterparty with which it trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations to the trust.
  • The return on your investment is directly related to the prevailing market price of the trust’s shares, which will trade at a varying discount (or premium) relative to the value of the underlying assets of the trust. As a result losses (or gains) may be higher or lower than those of the trust’s assets.
  • Global portfolios may include some exposure to Emerging Markets, which tend to be less stable than more established markets and can be affected by local political and economic conditions, reliability of trading systems, buying and selling practices and financial reporting standards.
  • Shares can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
  • Where the trust invests in assets which are denominated in currencies other than the base currency then currency exchange rate movements may cause the value of investments to fall as well as rise.
  • The trust may use gearing as part of its investment strategy. If the trust utilises its ability to gear, the profits and losses incured by the trust can be greater than those of a trust that does not use gearing.
  • If the trust seeks to reduce risks (such as exchange rate movements), the measures designed to do so may be ineffective, unavailable or detrimental.
  • Higher yieldings bonds are issued by companies that may have greater difficulty in repaying their financial obligations. High yield bonds are not traded as frequently as government bonds and therefore may be more difficult to trade in distressed markets.
  • All or part of the trust's management fee is taken from its capital. While this allows more income to be paid, it may also restrict capital growth or even result in capital erosion over time.
  • The portfolio allows the manager to use options for revenue enhancement purposes. Options can be volatile and may result in a capital loss.

Risk rating


Important message