Three pretty compelling reasons why investing in smaller firms can be more lucrative than large



​Would you like that in a small, medium or large, Sir?

UK based investors have tended to fill their portfolios with funds investing in the large, liquid firms of the FTSE 100. They are easy to buy in large amounts, generally well established in their sectors, and tend to have strong governance and long histories of creating shareholder value.
But history lends us evidence of investments with even stronger returns: in the UK’s smaller companies. These are firms in the bottom 30% of the UK stock market by market capitalisation – so the FTSE 250 and smaller, or less than around £4bn.
The volatility for investors likely contributes greatly to small-cap reluctance – their share prices tend to swing more wildly, setting nerves affray, and they’ve been known to disappear from time-to-time on account of poor management.

Source: Janus Henderson Investors
But the long-term numbers - where investors should be focused - speak for themselves: if you’d put £100 in the FTSE all-share in 1955, by 2016 you would’ve received £96,792; for the FTSE-Small-Cap it would’ve been £597,433. The latter is quite remarkable at six times the former.

Why is small - mighty?
Professors’ Elroy Dimson and Paul Marsh of London Business School developed the theory behind why small-cap firms outperform larger ones.
1) Organic growth – The growth potential tends to be greater because it’s much easier for small, more ambitious companies, with profits in the millions rather than billions of pounds, to double their business. It’s partly a law of numbers: a firm earning £1 million one year could feasibly double that over the course of the following year, but one that earned £1 billion would have to generate an additional billion pounds over that time to achieve the same growth rate.
Small companies also have more options for increasing business. They are inherently more nimble, dynamic and innovative, and so are more able to expand into new parts of the country, launch new products or services, or venture overseas – and make a huge difference to the bottom line. In contrast, new initiatives for giant multinationals are likely to affect only one of many subsidiaries or product lines.
And it’s a self-fulfilling prophecy – a company that repeatedly delivers on its earnings increasingly satisfies investors who then place a higher value on the business. This is known a momentum.



2) Lack of research – The stock market is a pricing mechanism that takes into account all of the publicly available information there is regarding a firm’s finances and its operations. The price is informed by the work of analysts. Big companies tend to be followed by lots of analysts: it averages 24 per firm for those over £10bn. Because their operations are so extensively scrutinised it’s very unlikely any great corporate initiatives or managerial shake-ups will pass under the radar, so the share price tends to reflect the business realities fairly accurately, making it harder for fund managers to find pricing anomalies.
In contrast smaller firms have fewer analysts following them, with those under £500m averaging only 2. It means there’s more opportunity to spot mispricing. Academics call this the ‘neglected effect’.
3) Mergers & Acquisitions - One of the big attractions of investing in smaller companies is the likelihood of a corporate action, usually when a larger firm snaps them up. For large, slow-growing companies, taking over an attractive small firm is probably the easiest way to expand the business in a lucrative new direction.
M&A deals are usually viewed as good news for shareholders in the acquired company because as owners of the business they will receive payment, usually in the form of cash or shares in the acquiring company, or a mixture.
Many companies had built up a war-chest of cash in the years following the financial crisis, having been reluctant to commit to major investments in such an uncertain environment – but as economic confidence has recovered they’ve been spending. According to Dealogic, records were broken in 2015, with $4.7trn of deals. 2016 still proved high at $3.8trn.

A rich history
The Henderson Smaller Companies Investment Trust has not always been in the business of smaller companies. It was founded in 1887 as the Trustees Executors and Securities Insurance Corporation, aiming to beat UK government bonds. Its original Chairman branched out into accountancy services and eventually formed Touche Ross, now a key part of Deloitte – one of the biggest accountancy firms in the world.
It was not until 1992 that it started investing in smaller companies, and in 2000 only in those from the UK. It makes it one of the oldest investment trusts there is: surviving, adapting and evolving over many years.
In 2002, in the wake if the dotcom crash, I became the Trust’s fund manager. Much has happened since: 4 prime ministers; various polarising US presidents; oil prices bucking between $30 and $140 a barrel; Harry Potter and his famous scar; a Middle-Eastern melt-down; a searing global financial crisis; and the explosion of social media, smartphones and apps.
Throughout these twists and turns markets have gyrated yet we’ve has delivered an average annual return of 17.9%, outperforming the benchmark in 13 of the last 14 years. We know the past doesn’t predict the future, but this would’ve transformed £1,000 of your cash into over £12,000.

We’ve done it through consistency, consistency….you get the idea - the method has never changed. Now supported by Indriatti van Hien, our focus is on finding exceptional management teams and good quality businesses, buying them at prices we think are value for money (other small-cap managers care less about firms priced expensively against history or otherwise, but we think this is a key mistake). With Brexit-this and interest rate-that, the UK market seems on a more cautious footing: probably now has never been a better time for stock picking.

These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. Any securities, funds, sectors and indices mentioned within this article do not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to buy or sell them.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.

The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.

For promotional purposes.

Important information

Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.

The Henderson Smaller Companies Investment Trust plc

Before investing in an investment trust referred to in this document, you should satisfy yourself as to its suitability and the risks involved, you may wish to consult a financial adviser.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Tax assumptions and reliefs depend upon an investor’s particular circumstances and may change if those circumstances or the law change.

Nothing in this document is intended to or should be construed as advice. This document is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment. It does not form part of any contract for the sale or purchase of any investment.

Issued in the UK by Janus Henderson Investors. Janus Henderson Investors is the name under which investment products and services are provided by Janus Capital International Limited (reg no. 3594615), Henderson Global Investors Limited (reg. no. 906355), Henderson Investment Funds Limited (reg. no. 2678531), AlphaGen Capital Limited (reg. no. 962757), Henderson Equity Partners Limited (reg. no.2606646), (each registered in England and Wales at 201 Bishopsgate, London EC2M 3AE and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority) and Henderson Management S.A. (reg no. B22848 at 2 Rue de Bitbourg, L-1273, Luxembourg and regulated by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier). We may record telephone calls for our mutual protection, to improve customer service and for regulatory record keeping purposes.

Specific risks

  • Active management techniques that have worked well in normal market conditions could prove ineffective or detrimental at other times.
  • This trust is suitable to be used as one component in several in a diversified investment portfolio. Investors should consider carefully the proportion of their portfolio invested into this trust.
  • The trust could lose money if a counterparty with which it trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations to the trust.
  • If a trust's portfolio is concentrated towards a particular country or geographical region, the investment carries greater risk than a portfolio diversified across more countries.
  • Derivatives use exposes the trust to risks different from, and potentially greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and may therefore result in additional loss, which could be significantly greater than the cost of the derivative.
  • The return on your investment is directly related to the prevailing market price of the trust’s shares, which will trade at a varying discount (or premium) relative to the value of the underlying assets of the trust. As a result losses (or gains) may be higher or lower than those of the trust’s assets.
  • Shares can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
  • The trust may use gearing as part of its investment strategy. If the trust utilises its ability to gear, the profits and losses incured by the trust can be greater than those of a trust that does not use gearing.
  • Most of the investments in this portfolio are in smaller companies shares. They may be more difficult to buy and sell and their share price may fluctuate more than that of larger companies.

Risk rating


Important message