Are fixed income markets overvalued?



​A comment we regularly hear from our clients, whether in individual meetings or at investor events, is that “bonds are expensive”. This, of course, is a fair point but is at odds with our current thinking. The reality is that in today’s world there are no ‘cheap assets’; and those that are, are cheap for good reasons.

In our view it is no longer possible to argue that bonds are cheap. Instead, we believe they are probably at or around fair value and reflect the current market environment in which we have low volatility, low defaults, low inflation and a reasonable level of global growth. 

Owners of bonds get their returns from two places: income and price movements. In light of current valuations, where spreads have tightened significantly post the Global Financial Crisis, we think that future bond returns will mostly come from the ‘income’ element. This is an environment in which a carry strategy (ie, collecting the coupon) still works, because there are many bonds with reasonable levels of coupon to ensure a good income stream.

The chart below shows the typical returns from various fixed income assets and equities over selected periods.  

Chart 1: historical total returns for fixed income and equities 

Source: Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Credit Suisse, Janus Henderson Investors, as at 31 October 2017.
Note: IG: investment grade; HY: high yield. Loans: Credit Suisse Western European Leveraged Loan Index and US Leveraged Loan Index. Total return year to date; annualised returns for 2, 3, 5 and 10Y. Corporate bond and loan returns hedged back to sterling; S&P 500 index returns in sterling.

Enough bonds in investors’ portfolios?
Another question we receive is whether we believe bonds are ‘under-owned’? It is clear that equities have attracted significant inflows and investors are feeling quite euphoric; typical late cycle characteristics. Equally, as chart 1 shows, fixed income asset classes have performed well on a 10-year view.

We would not argue that either asset class is cheap, but we do believe that investors should seek diversification by holding an appropriate level of bonds. Bonds, and particularly higher quality ones, tend to do well if equities sell off and so provide investors with that diversification. To illustrate this, while the S&P 500 index was down 38% in 2008 at the height of the crisis, the US investment grade (high quality) corporate bond index returned -7.9% and US 10-year Treasury 17%.

We think a lot of investors are currently focusing on where things can go wrong for bonds. The asset class has enjoyed a particularly strong run, with yields on US Treasuries reaching a July 2016 low of 1.36% (lower yields mean higher prices), although they have since climbed by over 1% from this low point*.

Rate rises – what will the impact be?
Investors also question whether the fact that the US economy is doing well, and Federal Reserve officials are suggesting more rate hikes are likely in the near future, mean that bonds are no longer a worthwhile investment? We suggest that they still are, and mainly because rate rises are likely to be measured.

The economy, while growing, is expanding far less quickly than historical norms, and inflation is also well anchored. We have long thought that Japan provided interesting parallels for other developed markets, given its ageing population and recovery from a debt fuelled crisis.

Based on the experience of Japan, we think that while we will see interest rates increasing, the rises are likely be measured and provide only a small headwind, which coupons should be able to more than offset. Also, within our portfolios, if bond yields rise, we will be able to reinvest our maturing bonds into more attractive ones with higher yields, which in time should boost fund returns.

Outlook and valuations
Chart 2 below is a comparison of the yields on various fixed income asset classes. Based on this, we are still constructive on investment grade and do see reasonable value, particularly within BBB-rated bonds in the US, while within high yield we still think that there is room for further compression in yields in the US.

Chart 2: current yields across global fixed income markets

Source: Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Bloomberg, Janus Henderson Investors, as at 8 November 2017.
Note:     Yield to worst for corporate bonds; generic 10-year yields for US Treasuries, German bunds and UK gilts.

The theme we expect to play out in 2018 is that the global economy will continue to do well. Defaults will likely continue to be low, so we favour higher yielding credit on a relative basis. The key will be to continue to be selective and remain disciplined with late-cycle conditions evident in the level of dispersion between sectors. This is magnified by significant technological and industry changes impacting certain industries and reflected in our approach of avoiding certain sectors altogether. It also drives our belief that being index agnostic ultimately helps our investors. 

The extent of current levels of dispersion in valuations within high yield and investment grade are shown in charts 3 and 4 below. The charts reveal a much higher level of dispersion within high yield but less so for investment grade given its higher quality (eg, lower levels of leverage).

To illustrate, high yield corporate bond spreads in sectors with percentile ranking of 50 and above, are now wider than their historical average spread (here the period from 2000 to now), which is indicative of sector issues, but 13 of the 20 sectors are trading in the bottom quartile (tighter spreads than their historical average).

We expect high yield dispersion to remain elevated and this should benefit us as opportunities present themselves for credit picking.

Chart 3: high yield bond valuations — ranking by sectors

Source: The Yield Book Inc, FTSE Index, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, Janus Henderson Investors, as at October 2017.
Note: Percentile ranks for high yield sector level spread averages. Data spans the period from 2000 to now.

Chart 4: investment grade bond valuations — ranking by sectors

Source: The Yield Book Inc, FTSE Index, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, Janus Henderson Investors, as at October 2017.
Note: Percentile ranks for investment grade sector level spread averages. Data spans the period from 2000 to now.

An additional point to note is that we have seen money flowing into alternatives, with investors chasing returns. These alternatives are often complex investment structures promising higher returns to compensate for the lower liquidity available versus traditional fixed income instruments. A lot of these strategies are unproven and the depth of liquidity in these markets is quite shallow. We still think investing in the relatively liquid developed world fixed income markets is a better way to seek to deliver superior risk-adjusted returns to our investors.

The questions we are currently being asked by investors are very valid. At a valuation level, while many high quality credits are trading at fairly expensive levels, in our view they are justifiable taking into account our macroeconomic outlook and the quality of the issuers. Further, given the need for income, we remain overweight high yield and the lower end investment grade corporate bonds.

In summary, we believe that the value proposition for investing in fixed income assets remains intact.

*10-year US Treasuries yield around 2.3%, as at 6 November 2017. 

These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. Any securities, funds, sectors and indices mentioned within this article do not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to buy or sell them.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.

The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.

For promotional purposes.

Important information

Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.

Janus Henderson Fixed Interest Monthly Income Fund

This document is intended solely for the use of professionals and is not for general public distribution.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Tax assumptions and reliefs depend upon an investor’s particular circumstances and may change if those circumstances or the law change.

If you invest through a third party provider you are advised to consult them directly as charges, performance and terms and conditions may differ materially.

Nothing in this document is intended to or should be construed as advice. This document is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment. It does not form part of any contract for the sale or purchase of any investment.

Any investment application will be made solely on the basis of the information contained in the Prospectus (including all relevant covering documents), which will contain investment restrictions. This document is intended as a summary only and potential investors must read the prospectus, and where relevant, the key investor information document before investing. Copies of the Fund’s prospectus and key investor information document are available in English, French, German, and Italian. Articles of incorporation, annual and semi-annual reports are available in English. All of these documents can be obtained free of cost from Janus Henderson Investors registered office: 201 Bishopsgate, London EC2M 3AE.

Issued in the UK by Janus Henderson Investors. Janus Henderson Investors is the name under which Henderson Global Investors Limited (reg. no. 906355), AlphaGen Capital Limited (reg. no. 962757), Henderson Equity Partners Limited (reg. no.2606646), (each incorporated and registered in England and Wales with registered office at 201 Bishopsgate, London EC2M 3AE) are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority to provide investment products and services. We may record telephone calls for our mutual protection, to improve customer service and for regulatory record keeping purposes.

Copies of the Fund’s prospectus are available in English, French, Spanish German and Dutch. Key investor information documents are available in English, Danish, German, Finnish, French, Italian, Norwegian, Spanish, Swedish and Dutch. Articles of incorporation, annual and semi-annual reports are available in English. All of these documents can be obtained free of cost from the local offices of Janus Henderson Investors: 201 Bishopsgate, London, EC2M 3AE for UK, Swedish and Scandinavian investors; Via Dante 14, 20121 Milan, Italy, for Italian investors and Roemer Visscherstraat 43-45, 1054 EW Amsterdam, the Netherlands. for Dutch investors; and the Fund’s: Austrian Paying Agent Raiffeisen Bank International AG, Am Stadtpark 9, A-1030 Vienna; French Paying Agent BNP Paribas Securities Services, 3, rue d’Antin, F-75002 Paris; German Information Agent Marcard, Stein & Co, Ballindamm 36, 20095 Hamburg; Belgian Financial Service Provider CACEIS Belgium S.A., Avenue du Port 86 C b320, B-1000 Brussels; Spanish Representative Allfunds Bank S.A. Estafeta, 6 Complejo Plaza de la Fuente, La Moraleja, Alcobendas 28109 Madrid; Singapore Representative Henderson Global Investors (Singapore) Limited, 138 Market Street #34-03/04 CapitaGreen, Singapore 048946; or Swiss Representative BNP Paribas Securities Services, Paris, succursale de Zurich, Selnaustrasse 16, 8002 Zurich who are also the Swiss Paying Agent.

Specific risks

  • Investment management techniques that have worked well in normal market conditions could prove ineffective or detrimental at other times.
  • Some or all of the annual management charge is taken from capital. This may constrain potential for capital growth.
  • This fund is designed to be used only as one component in several in a diversified investment portfolio. Investors should consider carefully the proportion of their portfolio invested into this fund.
  • The Fund could lose money if a counterparty with which it trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations to the Fund.
  • The value of a bond or money market instrument may fall if the financial health of the issuer weakens, or the market believes it may weaken. This risk is greater the lower the credit quality of the bond.
  • Derivatives use exposes the Fund to risks different from, and potentially greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and may therefore result in additional loss, which could be significantly greater than the cost of the derivative.
  • Changes in currency exchange rates may cause the value of your investment and any income from it to rise or fall.
  • If the Fund or a specific share class of the Fund seeks to reduce risks (such as exchange rate movements), the measures designed to do so may be ineffective, unavailable or detrimental.
  • When interest rates rise (or fall), the prices of different securities will be affected differently. In particular, bond values generally fall when interest rates rise. This risk is generally greater the longer the maturity of a bond investment.
  • Leverage arises from entering into contracts or derivatives whose terms have the effect of magnifying an outcome, meaning profits and losses from investment can be greater.
  • Any security could become hard to value or to sell at a desired time and price, increasing the risk of investment losses.

Risk rating


Regular as clockwork

Fixed income series

Our new insight series will be exploring themes within fixed income to illuminate the benefits of including this asset class in your portfolio.

Related funds


Important message