John Bennett: The shift to 'value' and European banks

01/02/2017

Download

We are often asked by investors what we expect to be important in moving markets. This year, we believe earnings (profits) growth to be particularly important, with certain sectors, which have until now been complete strangers to earnings upgrades – where analysts increase their earnings expectations of a company – and are starting to benefit from upwards revisions.

As part of this theme, we believe markets globally are moving from favouring ‘growth’ stocks (companies that have above-average earnings growth relative to their peers or other sectors) and instead turning to ‘value’ stocks (companies that appear to be undervalued on any number of financial metrics by investors relative to their peers). This marks a meaningful reversal following a sustained period of growth markets since the financial crisis. For most of that period, you would not have wanted to own the so-called ‘value’ stocks, so the second half of 2016 and beginning of 2017 marked a long overdue reversal in that trend.
For us, this shift in sentiment is based on a number of factors. We believe that central bankers are running out of road on what they can do with quantitative easing, and this will reshape markets. In our view, we had also reached the high water mark for valuations on bond proxies – “quality”, low-volatility stocks that have been consistently in demand, and oh-so-comfortable to be in. In the last three months of 2016 the backdrop changed and suddenly it became very uncomfortable to be in these stocks.

While it is early days, the signs are good that this change in leadership could be durable. Such a shift, should it continue, favours Europe, home to many ‘value’ stocks, and is positive for the kind of stocks and sectors that investors have found easy to avoid for much of the last decade.

The Trust’s positioning
 
In investment terms we have always tried to avoid lurching from one side of the boat to the other. We tend to make changes in a more gradual or incremental way. While not wishing to be labelled with any particular style, it was back in 2015 when we started using the phrase ‘tilt to value’ when talking to investors. Our first step was a tactical move into oil stocks in the third quarter of 2015.

Our tilt to value accelerated significantly in the second half of 2016. That acceleration was writ large by our move into European banks despite, like many other investors, finding the sector still very easy to dislike. History shows that investing in European banks would have been a spectacularly wrong call from 2008 until recently, but we feel a combination of vastly improved levels of cash to buffer against uncertainties and a turning point in interest rate expectations has made the industry once again investable.

European banks: from the ridiculous to the sublime?
 
No investment case is made up of just one ingredient and, when it comes to making an investment decision, you should not wait until all the ingredients are lined up in front of you. To use a racing analogy, if you wait for five green lights to come on before you go, then you’re already too late. We saw a number of new ingredients introduced last year that made banks more compelling. While these were possibly not enough for a long-term investment case, we felt that the industry had reached its lowest point. The number one ingredient for us was the change in bond yields. Interest rates had stopped falling. In particular, the yield on longer dated debt had stopped falling and was in negative yielding territory. This was extraordinary; an exceptional situation.

We were looking for catalysts for this extraordinary situation to revert to something more ordinary; in other words, we were looking for more normal yield environment whereby yields on longer maturity debt are higher than shorter dated due to the greater risks associated with time. That was the number one ingredient we felt was needed to become remotely interested in European banks. We took the view going into the second half of 2016 that this was likely to happen, and it was then that we reinvested in the sector. So far, this view has proved well founded and, if momentum continues, European banks should benefit further through 2017.

These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. Any securities, funds, sectors and indices mentioned within this article do not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to buy or sell them.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested.

The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation.

For promotional purposes.


Important information

Please read the following important information regarding funds related to this article.

Henderson European Focus Trust plc

Before investing in an investment trust referred to in this document, you should satisfy yourself as to its suitability and the risks involved, you may wish to consult a financial adviser.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Tax assumptions and reliefs depend upon an investor’s particular circumstances and may change if those circumstances or the law change.

Nothing in this document is intended to or should be construed as advice. This document is not a recommendation to sell or purchase any investment. It does not form part of any contract for the sale or purchase of any investment.

Issued in the UK by Janus Henderson Investors. Janus Henderson Investors is the name under which Henderson Global Investors Limited (reg. no. 906355), Henderson Investment Funds Limited (reg. no. 2678531), AlphaGen Capital Limited (reg. no. 962757), Henderson Equity Partners Limited (reg. no.2606646), (each incorporated and registered in England and Wales with registered office at 201 Bishopsgate, London EC2M 3AE) are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority to provide investment products and services. We may record telephone calls for our mutual protection, to improve customer service and for regulatory record keeping purposes.

Specific risks

  • Active management techniques that have worked well in normal market conditions could prove ineffective or detrimental at other times.
  • This trust is suitable to be used as one component in several in a diversified investment portfolio. Investors should consider carefully the proportion of their portfolio invested into this trust.
  • The trust may have a particularly concentrated portfolio (low number of holdings) relative to its investment universe and an adverse event impacting only a small number of holdings can create significant volatility or losses for the trust.
  • The trust could lose money if a counterparty with which it trades becomes unwilling or unable to meet its obligations to the trust.
  • If a trust's portfolio is concentrated towards a particular country or geographical region, the investment carries greater risk than a portfolio diversified across more countries.
  • The return on your investment is directly related to the prevailing market price of the trust’s shares, which will trade at a varying discount (or premium) relative to the value of the underlying assets of the trust. As a result losses (or gains) may be higher or lower than those of the trust’s assets.
  • Shares can lose value rapidly, and typically involve higher risks than bonds or money market instruments. The value of your investment may fall as a result.
  • Where the trust invests in assets which are denominated in currencies other than the base currency then currency exchange rate movements may cause the value of investments to fall as well as rise.
  • The trust may use gearing as part of its investment strategy. If the trust utilises its ability to gear, the profits and losses incured by the trust can be greater than those of a trust that does not use gearing.

Risk rating

Share

Important message